An Evaluation of EEG-based Metrics for Engagement Assessment of Distance Learners

Maintaining students’ cognitive engagement in educational settings is crucial to their performance, though quantifying this mental state in real-time for distance learners has not been studied extensively in natural distance learning environments. We record electroencephalographic (EEG) data of students watching online lecture videos and use it to predict engagement rated by human annotators. An evaluation of prior EEG-based engagement metrics that utilize power spectral density (PSD) features is presented. We examine the predictive power of various supervised machine learning approaches with both subject-independent and individualized models when using simple PSD feature functions. Our results show that engagement metrics with few power band variables, including those proposed in prior research, do not produce predictions consistent with human observations. We quantify the performance disparity between cross-subject and per-subject models and demonstrate that individual differences in EEG patterns necessitate a more complex metric for educational engagement assessment in natural distance learning environments.

[1]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[2]  Aly A. Farag,et al.  Toward active and unobtrusive engagement assessment of distance learners , 2017, 2017 Seventh International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII).

[3]  A. Pope,et al.  Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[4]  Daphne N. Yu,et al.  High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Michelle N. Lumicao,et al.  EEG correlates of task engagement and mental workload in vigilance, learning, and memory tasks. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[6]  Jane Sinclair,et al.  Dropout rates of massive open online courses : behavioural patterns , 2014 .

[7]  F. Yamada Frontal midline theta rhythm and eyeblinking activity during a VDT task and a video game: useful tools for psychophysiology in ergonomics. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[8]  I. Parberry,et al.  Evaluating player task engagement and arousal using electroencephalography , 2015 .

[9]  Mark W. Scerbo,et al.  Comparison of a Brain-Based Adaptive System and a Manual Adaptable System for Invoking Automation , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Mark W. Scerbo,et al.  Effects of a Biocybernetic System on Vigilance Performance , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[11]  Lawrence J. Prinzel,et al.  A Bio-Cybernetic System for Adaptive Automation , 1995 .

[12]  Sushil Chandra,et al.  EEG BASED COGNITIVE WORKLOAD CLASSIFICATION DURING NASA MATB-II MULTITASKING , 2015 .

[13]  Mark W Scerbo,et al.  An evaluation of an adaptive automation system using a cognitive vigilance task , 2004, Biological Psychology.

[14]  Mark W. Scerbo,et al.  Effects of a Psychophysiological System for Adaptive Automation on Performance, Workload, and the Event-Related Potential P300 Component , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Javier R. Movellan,et al.  The Faces of Engagement: Automatic Recognition of Student Engagementfrom Facial Expressions , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[16]  J. Fermaglich Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[17]  F Cincotti,et al.  Imaging functional brain connectivity patterns from high-resolution EEG and fMRI via graph theory. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[18]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data , 2014, NeuroImage.