A genetic algorithm approach to study the evolution of female preference based on male age

In many species, females prefer to mate with older males, possibly because older males are of higher genetic quality than younger males. However, the relationship between age and genetic quality may differ among populations depending on rates of age-dependent mortality. Therefore, we examined the evolution of female preference in populations with different age structures arising from differences in rates of age-dependent and age-independent mortality. To determine the shape of optimal female preference functions for males in each of 10 ages, we used a genetic algorithm approach. This approach allowed female preference for each male age to evolve independently. At moderate levels of mortality, females showed a bias in favour of the oldest males. At higher mortality rates, however, females showed the greatest preference for intermediate age males and, at very low mortality rates, females showed little bias overall. We also examined whether costs of choice influenced equilibrium preference functions. As opportunity costs increased, females were less likely to discriminate against young males and age structure became less important in determining preference function. Our results demonstrate that demographic patterns and costs of choice can influence female preference for young versus old males. In addition, the existence of female preference can alter the underlying demographic structure in a population.

[1]  K. Winemiller Life-history strategies and the effectiveness of sexual selection , 1992 .

[2]  M. Gross,et al.  Costs and Benefits of Female Mate Choice: Is There a Lek Paradox? , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[3]  J. Crow The high spontaneous mutation rate: is it a health risk? , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  L. Keller,et al.  Extraordinary lifespans in ants: a test of evolutionary theories of ageing , 1997, Nature.

[5]  D. Promislow,et al.  Mutation and senescence: where genetics and demography meet , 2004, Genetica.

[6]  Robert M. Gibson,et al.  The costs of female choice in a lekking bird , 1992 .

[7]  P. Wickman,et al.  An estimate of female mate searching costs in the lekking butterfly Coenonympha pamphilus , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  L. Simmons Correlates of male quality in the field cricket, Gryllus campestris L.: age, size, and symmetry determine pairing success in field populations , 1995 .

[9]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[10]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Mortality costs of sexual dimorphism in birds , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Fashion and age in pheasants: age differences in mate choice , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Mate sampling behaviour of black grouse females (Tetrao tetrix) , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  D. McLain The r-K continuum and the relative effectiveness of sexual selection , 1991 .

[14]  D. Promislow,et al.  Age-specific patterns of genetic variance in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Mortality. , 1996, Genetics.

[15]  H. Kokko,et al.  Evolution of female preference for old mates , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  L. Real Search Theory and Mate Choice. I. Models of Single-Sex Discrimination , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[17]  R. Ricklefs Evolutionary Theories of Aging: Confirmation of a Fundamental Prediction, with Implications for the Genetic Basis and Evolution of Life Span , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[18]  A. J. Noordwijk,et al.  Acquisition and Allocation of Resources: Their Influence on Variation in Life History Tactics , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[19]  J. Manning Age‐advertisement and the evolution of the peacock's train , 1989 .

[20]  M. Zuk PARASITE LOAD, BODY SIZE, AND AGE OF WILD‐CAUGHT MALE FIELD CRICKETS (ORTHOPTERA: GRYLLIDAE): EFFECTS ON SEXUAL SELECTION , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .

[22]  V. Barnett,et al.  Probability and Statistics: Theory and Applications. , 1978 .

[23]  A. Houde Genetic difference in female choice between two guppy populations , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  L. Simmons,et al.  Variability in call structure and pairing success of male field crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus: the effects of age, size and parasite load , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  M. Kirkpatrick SEXUAL SELECTION BY FEMALE CHOICE IN POLYGYNOUS ANIMALS , 1987 .

[26]  T. U. Grafe,et al.  Costs and benefits of mate choice in the lek-breeding reed frog, Hyperolius marmoratus , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  B. Sheldon,et al.  THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF LIFE HISTORY EVOLUTION , 1998 .

[28]  Linda Partridge,et al.  Life History Constraints on Sexual Selection , 1987 .

[29]  B. Gompertz,et al.  On the Nature of the Function Expressive of the Law of Human Mortality , 1825 .

[30]  George C. Williams,et al.  PLEIOTROPY, NATURAL SELECTION, AND THE EVOLUTION OF SENESCENCE , 1957, Science of Aging Knowledge Environment.

[31]  Benjamin Gompertz,et al.  XXIV. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. In a letter to Francis Baily, Esq. F. R. S. &c , 1825, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[32]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Direct selection on mate choice: female redlip blennies pay more for better mates , 1995 .

[33]  J. Manning Choosy females and correlates of male age , 1985 .

[34]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  Evolutionarily stable strategies of age-dependent sexual advertisement , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  D. Promislow,et al.  Genetic variation and aging. , 1995, Annual review of genetics.

[36]  D. Promislow SENESCENCE IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF MAMMALS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Do Females Prefer Older Males in Polygynous Bird Species? , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[38]  P. Medawar UNSOLVED problem of biology. , 1953, The Medical journal of Australia.

[39]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  How Does Offspring Quality Change with Age in Male Drosophila Melanogaster? , 1998, Behavior genetics.

[40]  A. Pomiankowski The costs of choice in sexual selection. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  J. Haldane New paths in genetics , 1942 .

[42]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[43]  H. Kokko Good genes, old age and life-history trade-offs , 1998, Evolutionary Ecology.

[44]  M. Tatar,et al.  Nutrition Mediates Reproductive Trade‐Offs with Age‐Specific Mortality in the Beetle Callosobruchus Maculatus , 1995 .

[45]  Larkin A. Powell,et al.  Evolution of female mate choice based on male age: are older males better mates? , 2000 .

[46]  P. Medawar Old Age and Natural Death , 2019, The Uniqueness of the Individual.

[47]  P. Abrams DOES INCREASED MORTALITY FAVOR THE EVOLUTION OF MORE RAPID SENESCENCE? , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  R. Trivers Parental investment and sexual selection , 1972 .

[49]  T. Jones,et al.  Adaptive female choice for middle–aged mates in a lekking sandfly , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  Donald Fraser,et al.  Probability and Statistics: Theory and Applications. , 1977 .

[51]  D. Weeks,et al.  Two-Sex Models: Chaos, Extinction, and Other Dynamic Consequences of Sex , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[52]  D. Price,et al.  Good genes and old age: Do old mates provide superior genes? , 1995 .