Biomechanical metrics of aesthetic perception in dance

Abstract The brain may be tuned to evaluate aesthetic perception through perceptual chunking when we observe the grace of the dancer. We modelled biomechanical metrics to explain biological determinants of aesthetic perception in dance. Eighteen expert (EXP) and intermediate (INT) dancers performed développé arabesque in three conditions: (1) slow tempo, (2) slow tempo with relevé, and (3) fast tempo. To compare biomechanical metrics of kinematic data, we calculated intra-excursion variability, principal component analysis (PCA), and dimensionless jerk for the gesture limb. Observers, all trained dancers, viewed motion capture stick figures of the trials and ranked each for aesthetic (1) proficiency and (2) movement smoothness. Statistical analyses included group by condition repeated-measures ANOVA for metric data; Mann–Whitney U rank and Friedman’s rank tests for nonparametric rank data; Spearman’s rho correlations to compare aesthetic rankings and metrics; and linear regression to examine which metric best quantified observers’ aesthetic rankings, p < 0.05. The goodness of fit of the proposed models was determined using Akaike information criteria. Aesthetic proficiency and smoothness rankings of the dance movements revealed differences between groups and condition, p < 0.0001. EXP dancers were rated more aesthetically proficient than INT dancers. The slow and fast conditions were judged more aesthetically proficient than slow with relevé (p < 0.0001). Of the metrics, PCA best captured the differences due to group and condition. PCA also provided the most parsimonious model to explain aesthetic proficiency and smoothness rankings. By permitting organization of large data sets into simpler groupings, PCA may mirror the phenomenon of chunking in which the brain combines sensory motor elements into integrated units of behaviour. In this representation, the chunk of information which is remembered, and to which the observer reacts, is the elemental mode shape of the motion rather than physical displacements. This suggests that reduction in redundant information to a simplistic dimensionality is related to the experienced observer’s aesthetic perception.

[1]  David J Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Judging complex movement performances for excellence: a principal components analysis-based technique applied to competitive diving. , 2014, Human movement science.

[2]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Principal components analysis of contemporary dance kinematics , 2004 .

[3]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  Adam W. Kiefer,et al.  Inter-segmental postural coordination measures differentiate athletes with ACL reconstruction from uninjured athletes. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[5]  S. Tipper,et al.  Self produced and observed actions influence emotion: the roles of action fluency and eye gaze , 2008, Psychological research.

[6]  Dimitri Volchenkov,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis of kinematic signals in classical ballet , 2013, J. Comput. Sci..

[7]  B. Montero,et al.  Practice makes perfect: the effect of dance training on the aesthetic judge , 2012 .

[8]  D. E. Glaser,et al.  Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[9]  Shaw Bronner,et al.  Differences in Segmental Coordination and Postural Control in a Multi-joint Dance Movement Développé Arabesque , 2012, Journal of dance medicine & science : official publication of the International Association for Dance Medicine & Science.

[10]  Bettina E. Bläsing,et al.  Segmentation of dance movement: effects of expertise, visual familiarity, motor experience and music , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[11]  N. Stergiou,et al.  Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: is there a connection? , 2011, Human movement science.

[12]  R. Passingham,et al.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Justin J Kavanagh,et al.  Lower trunk motion and speed-dependence during walking , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[14]  Ian Cross,et al.  Cognitive Science and the Cultural Nature of Music , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  PCA in studying coordination and variability: a tutorial. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  Thomas Schack,et al.  From action representation to action execution: exploring the links between cognitive and biomechanical levels of motor control , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[17]  Jin H. Yan,et al.  Practice Effects on Motor Control in Healthy Seniors and Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease , 2006, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[18]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Expertise and Attunement to Kinematic Constraints , 2008, Perception.

[19]  T. Morrison,et al.  Dynamical Systems , 2021, Nature.

[20]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[21]  R. Zernicke,et al.  Jerk-cost modulations during the practice of rapid arm movements , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  T. Flash,et al.  Moving gracefully: quantitative theories of motor coordination , 1987, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  Antoni Gomila,et al.  A Norming Study and Library of 203 Dance Movements , 2014, Perception.

[24]  E. C. Ritchie,et al.  Gender Differences , 1981, Language in Society.

[25]  A. Hreljac Stride smoothness evaluation of runners and other athletes. , 2000, Gait & posture.

[26]  M. Grosbras,et al.  In the here and now: Enhanced motor corticospinal excitability in novices when watching live compared to video recorded dance , 2013, Cognitive neuroscience.

[27]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  A Dance to the Music of Time: Aesthetically-Relevant Changes in Body Posture in Performing Art , 2009, PloS one.

[28]  Max Tegmark The Mathematical Universe , 2007, Foundations of Physics.

[29]  Ivan Čuk,et al.  Is the Quality of Judging in Women Artistic Gymnastics Equivalent at Major Competitions of Different Levels? , 2013, Journal of human kinetics.

[30]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Neurocognitive control in dance perception and performance. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[31]  K. Kulig,et al.  Intra-task variability of trunk coordination during a rate-controlled bipedal dance jump , 2012, Journal of sports sciences.

[32]  Catherine J. Stevens,et al.  Cognition and the temporal arts: Investigating audience response to dance using PDAs that record continuous data during live performance , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[33]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Gender differences in lower extremity coupling variability during an unanticipated cutting maneuver. , 2005, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[34]  P. Haggard,et al.  Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation , 2010, Psychological research.

[35]  Catherine J. Stevens,et al.  Thinking in Four Dimensions: Creativity and Cognition in Contemporary Dance , 2005 .

[36]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Risk-Sensitivity in Sensorimotor Control , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[37]  Cassie Wilson,et al.  Coordination variability and skill development in expert triple jumpers , 2008, Sports biomechanics.

[38]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  A Robust and Sensitive Metric for Quantifying Movement Smoothness , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  Heather Winskel,et al.  Perceiving dance: schematic expectations guide experts' scanning of a contemporary dance film. , 2010, Journal of dance medicine & science : official publication of the International Association for Dance Medicine & Science.

[40]  Nahoko Sato,et al.  Key features of hip hop dance motions affect evaluation by judges. , 2014, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[41]  Adam W. Kiefer,et al.  Multi-segmental postural coordination in professional ballet dancers. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[42]  C. Stevens,et al.  Backwards and forwards in space and time: Recalling dance movement from long-term memory , 2011 .

[43]  Karl M Newell,et al.  Learning to coordinate redundant degrees of freedom in a dynamic balance task. , 2003, Human movement science.

[44]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Topological correlations of structural and functional networks in patients with traumatic brain injury , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[45]  Danielle N Jarvis,et al.  Trunk coordination in dancers and nondancers. , 2014, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[46]  T. Flash,et al.  Trajectory of the index finger during grasping , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[48]  Ludovic Marin,et al.  Dynamics of expertise level: Coordination in handstand. , 2009, Human movement science.

[49]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Parkinsonism Reduces Coordination of Fingers, Wrist, and Arm in Fine Motor Control , 1997, Experimental Neurology.

[50]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[51]  K M Newell,et al.  Change in the Organization of Degrees of Freedom With Learning , 2006, Journal of motor behavior.

[52]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Effect of accuracy constraint on joint coordination during pointing movements , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  Donna Krasnow,et al.  Development of the "performance competence evaluation measure": assessing qualitative aspects of dance performance. , 2009, Journal of dance medicine & science : official publication of the International Association for Dance Medicine & Science.

[54]  Keith Davids,et al.  Coordination changes in a discrete multi-articular action as a function of practice. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[55]  Iván Gómez-Conde,et al.  Automatic recognition and scoring of olympic rhythmic gymnastic movements. , 2014, Human movement science.

[56]  N. Hogan,et al.  Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  P. Keller,et al.  Perceiving performer identity and intended expression intensity in point-light displays of dance , 2011, Psychological research.

[58]  E. Müller,et al.  Movement variability and skill level of various throwing techniques. , 2012, Human movement science.

[59]  Kae Nakamura,et al.  Emergence of rhythm during motor learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[61]  Guido Orgs,et al.  Learning to like it: Aesthetic perception of bodies, movements and choreographic structure , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[62]  H. Leder,et al.  A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. , 2004, British journal of psychology.

[63]  Dimitri Volchenkov,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Kinematic Decomposition of Movements , 2014 .

[64]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Sensitivity of Smoothness Measures to Movement Duration, Amplitude, and Arrests , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[65]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  The Impact of Aesthetic Evaluation and Physical Ability on Dance Perception , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[66]  Luke S. Hopper,et al.  Lower limb kinematic variability in dancers performing drop landings onto floor surfaces with varied mechanical properties. , 2013, Human movement science.

[67]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Low back pain status affects pelvis-trunk coordination and variability during walking and running. , 2011, Clinical biomechanics.

[68]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  The impact of sensorimotor experience on affective evaluation of dance , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[69]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/acp.1110 Chunking Models of Expertise: Implications for Education FERNAND GOBET* , 2022 .

[70]  Ferran Reverter,et al.  Kinematic Parameters That Influence the Aesthetic Perception of Beauty in Contemporary Dance , 2013, Perception.

[71]  R. Emmerik,et al.  A dynamical systems approach to lower extremity running injuries. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[72]  Alan Hreljac The relationship between smoothness and performance during the practice of a lower limb obstacle avoidance task , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[73]  Shigeru Sato,et al.  Effect of motion smoothness on brain activity while observing a dance: An fMRI study using a humanoid robot , 2010, Social neuroscience.

[74]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Swinging in the brain: shared neural substrates for behaviors related to sequencing and music , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[75]  Robert J. Zatorre,et al.  Moving on Time: Brain Network for Auditory-Motor Synchronization is Modulated by Rhythm Complexity and Musical Training , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[76]  William J. McDermott,et al.  Issues in Quantifying Variability From a Dynamical Systems Perspective , 2000 .

[77]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[78]  Kim Vincs,et al.  Snapshots of complexity: using motion capture and principal component analysis to reconceptualise dance , 2014, Digit. Creativity.

[79]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics , 2003 .

[80]  M. Wyon,et al.  Association between Selected Physical Fitness Parameters and Aesthetic Competence in Contemporary Dancers , 2009, Journal of dance medicine & science : official publication of the International Association for Dance Medicine & Science.

[81]  Christian Maiwald,et al.  Using the variability of continuous relative phase as a measure to discriminate between healthy and injured runners. , 2012, Human movement science.