Understanding and facilitating sustainable agricultural practice: A comprehensive analysis of adoption behaviour among Malaysian paddy farmers

Abstract With the increased stress on sustainability and food security, in addition, the need toward halting environmental deprivation has focused attention on Individual farmers subjectively perceive the attributes of SAP and their subsequent benefits. Qualifying this knowledge is important, but past efforts have largely been unsystematic. This research paradigm purpose is to observe the influence of Malaysian paddy farmer’s adoption intention towards sustainable agriculture.This systematic study assesses the structure of perceived Awareness of sustainable agricultural practices. A convenient sampling technique was used to select the sample. A total of 132 questionnaires was distributed to Malaysian Paddy farmers, around the Malaysian state which was used for data analysis. The result from the structural analysis suggests that the results of confirmatory factor analysis indicate that the most robust. Moreover, technology-aided communication described as moderates the relationships between Attitude, subjective Norm, Perceived behavioral control and intention.Overall, findings of this study extend the understanding, to link noneconomic benefits to profitability to the attribute of relative advantage. Our work represents a guide to assist change agents to evaluate farmer perceptions at different locations systematically. This structured method will help effectively to design and promote sustainable agriculture and other green agricultural innovations. Discussions and implications for Malaysian paddy farmers, limitations, and suggestions for future research are also delivered in the line of this research study.

[1]  L. Prokopy,et al.  Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: Evidence from the literature , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[2]  R. Wesselink,et al.  Encouraging sustainability in the workplace: a survey on the pro-environmental behaviour of university employees , 2015 .

[3]  Y. Tey The adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: an integrative approach for Malaysian vegetable farmers. , 2013 .

[4]  Florian G. Kaiser,et al.  Ecological behavior and its environmental consequences: a life cycle assessment of a self-report measure , 2003 .

[5]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  Generalizations on Consumer Innovation Adoption: A Meta-Analysis on Drivers of Intention and Behavior , 2011 .

[6]  Adrian B. Ryans Estimating Consumer Preferences for a New Durable Brand in an Established Product Class , 1974 .

[7]  D. Knowler,et al.  Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research , 2007 .

[8]  E. Magnani,et al.  Green R&D, Technology Spillovers, and Market Uncertainty: An Empirical Investigation , 2012, Land Economics.

[9]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[10]  H. Veisi Exploring the determinants of adoption behaviour of clean technologies in agriculture: a case of integrated pest management , 2012 .

[11]  N. Minot,et al.  Reforming agricultural markets in Africa: Achievements and challenges , 2002 .

[12]  Tick Hui Oh,et al.  Green progress and prospect in Malaysia , 2011 .

[13]  Timothy F. Smith,et al.  The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours , 2011 .

[14]  Adam Reimer,et al.  The multi-dimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: implications for conservation adoption , 2012 .

[15]  David L. Sunding,et al.  The agricultural innovation process: Research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sector , 1999 .

[16]  Y. L. Chiew,et al.  Current state and environmental impact assessment for utilizing oil palm empty fruit bunches for fuel, fiber and fertilizer – A case study of Malaysia , 2013 .

[17]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[18]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[19]  Jillian Anable,et al.  The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles , 2013 .

[20]  Adriana Jakovcevic,et al.  Dimensiones Psicológicas de la Conservación de la Energía , 2012 .

[21]  Mithilesh Kumar Jha,et al.  Jatropha curcas phytotomy and applications: Development as a potential biofuel plant through biotechnological advancements , 2016 .

[22]  David B. Richardson,et al.  Electric vehicles and the electric grid: A review of modeling approaches, Impacts, and renewable energy integration , 2013 .

[23]  Heesup Han,et al.  An investigation of green hotel customers' decision formation: developing an extended model of the theory of planned behavior. , 2010 .

[24]  David Zilberman,et al.  Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey , 1985, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[25]  D. D. Vaus,et al.  Surveys in Social Research , 1991 .

[26]  Shahrina Md Nordin,et al.  Adoption of PHEV/EV in Malaysia: A critical review on predicting consumer behaviour , 2017 .

[27]  Amran Rasli,et al.  A new era of sustainable transport: An experimental examination on forecasting adoption behavior of EVs among Malaysian consumer , 2017 .

[28]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[29]  Anson H. Hines,et al.  Effects of anthropogenic shoreline hardening and invasion by Phragmites australis on habitat quality for juvenile blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) , 2011 .

[30]  M. Khan,et al.  Effects of ammonia and root-knot nematode on tomato , 1995 .

[31]  L. Fabrigar,et al.  Theory of Planned Behavior , 2017 .

[32]  Pandian Vasant,et al.  An Integrative Approach to Study on Consumer Behavior towards Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles Revolution: Consumer Behavior towards Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2017 .

[33]  A. Bryman Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[34]  V. Ruttan Technology, Growth, and Development: An Induced Innovation Perspective , 2000 .

[35]  B. Johnston,et al.  Agriculture and Economic Growth: Japan's Experience , 2015 .

[36]  Pandian Vasant,et al.  A comprehensive review on theoretical framework‐based electric vehicle consumer adoption research , 2017 .

[37]  T. Gärling,et al.  Behaviour Theory and Soft Transport Policy Measures , 2011 .

[38]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[39]  Nadia Adnan,et al.  A market modeling review study on predicting Malaysian consumer behavior towards widespread adoption of PHEV/EV , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[40]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[42]  T Ramayah,et al.  Sustaining the environment through recycling: an empirical study. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[43]  Isabel P. Riquelme,et al.  Consumers’ Perceptions of Online and Offline Retailer Deception: A Moderated Mediation Analysis , 2016 .

[44]  Leonardo A. A. T. Sambodo The Decision Making Processes of Semi-commercial Farmers: A Case Study of Technology Adoption in Indonesia , 2009 .

[45]  Linda Steg,et al.  Can Protection Motivation Theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in the Netherlands , 2014 .

[46]  A. Wiredu,et al.  Fertilizer Adoption and Use Intensity Among Smallholder Farmers in Northern Ghana: A Case Study of the AGRA Soil Health Project , 2013 .

[47]  Komol Singha,et al.  Sustainability of Rice Cultivation: A Study of Manipur , 2016 .

[48]  S. Nordin,et al.  Benefit of One Baja Fertilizer for Attaining Agricultural Sustainability among Malaysian Paddy Farmers: Agricultural Sustainability among Malaysian Paddy Farmers , 2017 .

[49]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Public Attitudes, Lay Theories and Mental Health Literacy: The Understanding of Mental Health , 2012 .

[50]  Nabsiah Abdul Wahid,et al.  Investigation of green marketing tools' effect on consumers' purchase behavior , 2011 .

[51]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[52]  C. Pray The Green Revolution as a Case Study in Transfer of Technology , 1981 .

[53]  J. Riet,et al.  Understanding farmers' decisions with regard to animal welfare: The case of changing to group housing for pregnant sows , 2012 .

[54]  A. Lansink,et al.  Understanding farmers’ intention to adopt improved natural grassland using the theory of planned behavior , 2014 .

[55]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[56]  C. Dienes Actions and intentions to pay for climate change mitigation: Environmental concern and the role of economic factors , 2015 .

[57]  A. Robertson,et al.  Agriculture and the Environmental Imperative , 1998 .

[58]  M. Bruegel From the Crisis of Food to Food in Crisis , 2011 .

[59]  M. J. Kabaci Theses and Dissertations Completed in Family and Consumer Sciences: 2013 , 2014 .

[60]  Hugh Kelley,et al.  Understanding the uptake of organic farming: accounting for heterogeneities among Irish farmers , 2013 .

[61]  Muhammad Abdul Jalil,et al.  Sustainable Development in Malaysia: A Case Study on Household Waste Management , 2010 .

[62]  T. Milfont,et al.  Psycho‐Social Factors Influencing Forest Conservation Intentions on the Agricultural Frontier , 2014 .

[63]  Martin Achtnicht,et al.  German Car Buyers' Willingness to Pay to Reduce Co2 Emissions , 2012 .

[64]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[65]  Matthias Fink,et al.  Robustness of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions , 2015 .

[66]  V. Karunaratne,et al.  A green slow-release fertilizer composition based on urea-modified hydroxyapatite nanoparticles encapsulated wood , 2011 .

[67]  R. Villano,et al.  Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of modern rice technologies and good management practices in the Philippines , 2012 .

[68]  Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou,et al.  Why people keep coming back to Facebook: Explaining and predicting continuance participation from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[69]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[70]  C. O’Brien,et al.  Aquatic food security: insights into challenges and solutions from an analysis of interactions between fisheries, aquaculture, food safety, human health, fish and human welfare, economy and environment , 2016 .

[71]  Mei‐Fang Chen,et al.  Developing an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels , 2014 .

[72]  Akinwumi A. Adesina,et al.  Farmers' perceptions and adoption of new agricultural technology: evidence from analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea, West Africa , 1995 .

[73]  J. R. Borges The role of psychological factors in the adoption of improved natural grassland by Brazilian cattle farmers in Biome Pampa , 2015 .

[74]  Erik Cohen,et al.  Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. , 1988 .

[75]  Johan Jansson,et al.  Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda , 2015 .

[76]  S. Nordin,et al.  Adoption of green fertilizer technology among paddy farmers: A possible solution for Malaysian food security , 2017 .

[77]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[78]  Steven A. Taylor,et al.  Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension , 1992 .