Procedural justice and compliance behaviour: the mediating role of emotions

Procedural justice researchers have consistently found that if authorities treat people with trust, fairness, respect and neutrality, people will not only be more willing to cooperate with authorities, but they will also be more likely to comply with authority decisions and rules. Newresearchin this area has gone on to explore the role that emotions play in response to procedural justice and injustice. What this new research has neglected to do, however, is examine whether emotions mediate the effect of procedural justice on subsequent compliance behaviour in real life settings. Using longitudinal surveydatacollectedintwo real-lifecontexts(Study 1:ataxationdispute(N ¼652),andStudy2:workplaces (N ¼2366)), the present study will show that perceptions of procedural justice influence the emotions experienced by people, but more importantly these emotional reactions (i.e. anger and happiness) mediate the effect of justice on subsequent compliance behaviour. In other words, it is these positive and negative emotional reactions to perceived justice or injustice that go on to predict who will and will not comply with authority decisions and rules. Copyright # 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Kristina Murphy,et al.  Shaming, Shame and Recidivism: A Test of Reintegrative Shaming Theory in the White-Collar Crime Context , 2007 .

[2]  D. Wigboldus,et al.  Emotional reactions to harmful intergroup behavior , 2006 .

[3]  D. Wigboldus,et al.  Emotional reactions to harmful intergroup behavior [Erratum 36(1), 15-30] , 2006 .

[4]  Kristina Murphy,et al.  Regulating More Effectively: The Relationship between Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Tax Non-Compliance , 2005 .

[5]  J. Chébat,et al.  How emotions mediate the effects of perceived justice on loyalty in service recovery situations: an empirical study , 2005 .

[6]  Kristina Murphy,et al.  The Role of Trust in Nurturing Compliance: A Study of Accused Tax Avoiders , 2004, Law and human behavior.

[7]  K. Bos On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments , 2003 .

[8]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing , 2003 .

[9]  Kristina Murphy The Importance of Procedural Justice in Securing Compliance: A Study of Tax Scheme Investors , 2003 .

[10]  Kristina Murphy,et al.  Procedural Justice and Tax Compliance , 2003 .

[11]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  Toward Understanding the Psychology of Reactions to Perceived Fairness: The Role of Affect Intensity , 2003 .

[12]  Maureen L. Ambrose,et al.  A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: an examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  K. P. van den bos,et al.  On the subjective quality of social justice: the role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Bettina Lange The Emotional Dimension in Legal Regulation , 2002 .

[15]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Self and social identity. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  Lars P. Feld,et al.  Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated , 2002, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  Yuen J. Huo,et al.  Trust in the Law , 2002 .

[18]  M. Wenzel PRINCIPLES OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS IN REMINDER LETTERS: A FIELD-EXPERIMENT , 2002 .

[19]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Procedural Justice, Outcome Favorability and Emotion , 2000 .

[20]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Mariët Hagedoorn,et al.  Injustice and Employees' Destructive Responses: The Mediating Role of State Negative Affect , 2000 .

[22]  M. Krohn,et al.  The Self-Report Method for Measuring Delinquency and Crime , 2000 .

[23]  Russell Cropanzano,et al.  Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. , 1999 .

[24]  Karen A. Hegtvedt,et al.  Fairness and Emotions: Reactions to the Process and Outcomes of Negotiations , 1999 .

[25]  Caroline Kelly,et al.  The social psychology of collective action : identity, injustice and gender , 1999 .

[26]  V. Murphy-Berman,et al.  Fairness and Health Care Decision Making: Testing the Group Value Model of Procedural Justice , 1999, Social justice research.

[27]  Steve Williams,et al.  The Effects of Distributive and Procedural Justice on Performance , 1999 .

[28]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  The Role of Injustice in the Elicitation of Differential Emotional Reactions , 1998 .

[29]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology , 1994 .

[30]  John Braithwaite,et al.  Trust and compliance , 1994 .

[31]  L. Montada Injustice in harm and loss , 1994 .

[32]  Eliot R. Smith Social Identity and Social Emotions: Toward New Conceptualizations of Prejudice , 1993 .

[33]  T. Tyler,et al.  A Relational Model of Authority in Groups , 1992 .

[34]  T. Tyler Why People Obey the Law , 2021 .

[35]  L. Montada,et al.  Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged , 1989 .

[36]  T. Tyler The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. , 1989 .

[37]  R. Folger,et al.  Referent Cognitions and Task Decision Autonomy: Beyond Equity Theory , 1989 .

[38]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[39]  A. Dijker Emotional reactions to ethnic minorities , 1987 .

[40]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  J. Traupmann,et al.  Equity: Theory and Research , 1978 .

[42]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Equity Theory Revisited: Comments and Annotated Bibliography , 1976 .

[43]  J. S. Adams,et al.  Inequity In Social Exchange , 1965 .

[44]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .