Neural correlates of object size and object location during grasping actions

The visuo‐motor channel hypothesis (Jeannerod, 1981) postulates that grasping movements consist of a grip and a transport component differing in their reliance on intrinsic vs. extrinsic object properties (e.g. size vs. location, respectively). While recent neuroimaging studies have revealed separate brain areas implicated in grip and transport components within the parietal lobe, less is known about the neural processing of extrinsic and intrinsic properties of objects for grasping actions. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation to examine the cortical areas involved in processing object size, object location or both. Participants grasped (using the dominant right hand) or passively viewed sequential pairs of objects that could differ in size, location or both. We hypothesized that if intrinsic and extrinsic object properties are processed separately, as suggested by the visuo‐motor channel hypothesis, we would observe adaptation to object size in areas that code the grip and adaptation to location in areas that code the transport component. On the other hand, if intrinsic and extrinsic object properties are not processed separately, brain areas involved in grasping may show adaptation to both object size and location. We found adaptation to object size for grasping movements in the left anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS), in agreement with the idea that object size is processed separately from location. In addition, the left superior parietal occipital sulcus (SPOC), primary somatosensory and motor area (S1/M1), precuneus, dorsal premotor cortex (PMd), and supplementary motor area (SMA) showed non‐additive adaptation to both object size and location. We propose different roles for the aIPS as compared with the SPOC, S1/M1, precuneus, PMd and SMA. In particular, while the aIPS codes intrinsic object properties, which are relevant for hand preshaping and force scaling, area SPOC, S1/M1, precuneus, PMd and SMA code intrinsic as well as extrinsic object properties, both of which are relevant for digit positioning during grasping.

[1]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Impaired grasping in a patient with optic ataxia: Primary visuomotor deficit or secondary consequence of misreaching? , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Beyond retinotopic mapping: the spatial representation of objects in the human lateral occipital complex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  The Cortical Control of Visually Guided Grasping , 2008, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[5]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single‐subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self‐organizing group independent component analysis , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[6]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.

[7]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Xiaogang Yan,et al.  Specificity of Human Parietal Saccade and Reach Regions during Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Tutis Vilis,et al.  fMRI reveals greater within‐ than between‐hemifield integration in the human lateral occipital cortex , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[10]  K. J. Cole Lifting a familiar object: visual size analysis, not memory for object weight, scales lift force , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  C. Galletti,et al.  Wide-Field Retinotopy Defines Human Cortical Visual Area V6 , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[13]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Beyond grasping: Representation of action in human anterior intraparietal sulcus , 2007, NeuroImage.

[14]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms for determining the perceived heaviness of objects and the predicted weight of objects during lifting: An fMRI investigation of the size–weight illusion , 2009, NeuroImage.

[15]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  Decoding Action Intentions from Preparatory Brain Activity in Human Parieto-Frontal Networks , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Svetlana S. Georgieva,et al.  Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Adaptation and Size Invariance of Shape Processing by Humans and Monkeys , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Functional organization of human posterior parietal cortex: grasping- and reaching-related activations relative to topographically organized cortex. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Jody C Culham,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals the Neural Substrates of Arm Transport and Grip Formation in Reach-to-Grasp Actions in Humans , 2010 .

[19]  Michael Vesia,et al.  Human parietal and primary motor cortical interactions are selectively modulated during the transport and grip formation of goal-directed hand actions , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Eris Chinellato,et al.  The neuroscience of vision-based grasping: a functional review for computational modeling and bio-inspired robotics. , 2009, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[21]  Jody C Culham,et al.  Decoding the neural mechanisms of human tool use , 2013, eLife.

[22]  H. Forssberg,et al.  Differential fronto-parietal activation depending on force used in a precision grip task: an fMRI study. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[24]  Jody C Culham,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance adaptation reveals the involvement of the dorsomedial stream in hand orientation for grasping. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Cortical topography of human anterior intraparietal cortex active during visually guided grasping. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  H. Sakata,et al.  Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  C. Galletti,et al.  The cortical visual area V6: brain location and visual topography , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  J. Culham,et al.  What does the brain do when you fake it? An FMRI study of pantomimed and real grasping. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Fraser W. Smith,et al.  Decoding Effector-Dependent and Effector-Independent Movement Intentions from Human Parieto-Frontal Brain Activity , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  C. Galletti,et al.  Human V6: The Medial Motion Area , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  M. Davare,et al.  Temporal Dissociation between Hand Shaping and Grip Force Scaling in the Anterior Intraparietal Area , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[33]  U. Castiello,et al.  Differential cortical activity for precision and whole‐hand visually guided grasping in humans , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[34]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  Scott T. Grafton The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  Michela Gamberini,et al.  ‘Arm‐reaching’ neurons in the parietal area V6A of the macaque monkey , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[37]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: Repetition effects for pictures versus real objects , 2011, Scientific reports.

[38]  A. Murata,et al.  Cortical connections of the macaque anterior intraparietal (AIP) area. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  J Randall Flanagan,et al.  Where One Hand Meets the Other: Limb-Specific and Action-Dependent Movement Plans Decoded from Preparatory Signals in Single Human Frontoparietal Brain Areas , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Patrizia Fattori,et al.  The Dorsomedial Pathway Is Not Just for Reaching: Grasping Neurons in the Medial Parieto-Occipital Cortex of the Macaque Monkey , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[42]  J. Culham,et al.  The human dorsal stream adapts to real actions and 3D shape processing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  W. Medendorp,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation reveals the cortical networks for processing grasp-relevant object properties. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  C. Galletti,et al.  Spatial tuning of reaching activity in the medial parieto‐occipital cortex (area V6A) of macaque monkey , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[45]  R. Hari,et al.  Activation of the human occipital and parietal cortex by pattern and luminance stimuli: neuromagnetic measurements. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Neuroimaging reveals enhanced activation in a reach-selective brain area for objects located within participants’ typical hand workspaces , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  M. Jeannerod Specialized channels for cognitive responses , 1981, Cognition.

[48]  M. Goodale,et al.  An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[49]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  G. Sheean,et al.  Upper Motor Neurone Syndrome and Spasticity: Neurophysiology of spasticity , 2008 .

[51]  Wolfgang Grodd,et al.  Comparing Natural and Constrained Movements: New Insights into the Visuomotor Control of Grasping , 2007, PloS one.

[52]  Eran Stark,et al.  Comparison of direction and object selectivity of local field potentials and single units in macaque posterior parietal cortex during prehension. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  C Dohle,et al.  Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension , 1998, Neurology.

[54]  R. Hari,et al.  Coinciding early activation of the human primary visual cortex and anteromedial cuneus , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  Jody C Culham,et al.  Is That within Reach? fMRI Reveals That the Human Superior Parieto-Occipital Cortex Encodes Objects Reachable by the Hand , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  A Preference for Contralateral Stimuli in Human Object- and Face-Selective Cortex , 2007, PloS one.

[57]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Parieto-Frontal Connectivity during Visually Guided Grasping , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  Jessie Chen,et al.  Neurophysiology of prehension. III. Representation of object features in posterior parietal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[59]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  fMRI reveals a preference for near viewing in the human parieto-occipital cortex , 2007, NeuroImage.

[60]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Two distinct neural effects of blinking on human visual processing , 2005, NeuroImage.

[61]  Matthias Niemeier,et al.  A contralateral preference in the lateral occipital area: sensory and attentional mechanisms. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[62]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Object size modulates fronto‐parietal activity during reaching movements , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.

[63]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  R. S. Johansson,et al.  Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[65]  M. Goodale,et al.  FMRI Reveals a Dissociation between Grasping and Perceiving the Size of Real 3D Objects , 2007, PloS one.

[66]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Divide and conquer: A defense of functional localizers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[67]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  Grip forces isolated from knowledge about object properties following a left parietal lesion , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.