Equity versus efficiency: a dilemma for the NHS

Concerns about equitable provision and financing of health care have characterised the NHS since its foundation. Evidence of persisting and, in some cases, widening health inequalities, gathered since the publication of the Black report,1 has progressively raised equity to a high rank among health policy objectives.2 Though the general aim of reducing health inequalities appears uncontroversial, the practical notions of equity that should inform policy and the ways in which these should be implemented are far from clear. Even more importantly, there is no consensus on how to deal with policies that may cause a conflict between the goals of equity and efficiency—that is, those that may improve efficiency while increasing health inequalities or improve fairness while decreasing efficiency. The equity versus efficiency dilemma3 has been virtually ignored in the political debate, often leading to inconsistent judgments in the development of health policies. In a report recently published by the NHS Health Technology Assessment programme4 we examined examples of the equity-efficiency dilemma that the NHS …

[1]  G. Hill,et al.  Impaired wound healing in surgical patients with varying degrees of malnutrition. , 1986, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[2]  P. Lewis,et al.  Which of two individuals do you treat when only their ages are different and you can't treat both? , 1989, Journal of medical ethics.

[3]  M. Rosato,et al.  Incidence of health of the nation cancers by social class. , 1997, Population trends.

[4]  S. Boesby,et al.  Influence of postoperative enteral nutrition on postsurgical infections. , 1996, Gut.

[5]  J. Reynolds,et al.  1997 Harry M. Vars Research Award. Does the route of feeding modify gut barrier function and clinical outcome in patients after major upper gastrointestinal surgery? , 1997, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[6]  G. Hill,et al.  Effects of immediate postoperative enteral nutrition on body composition, muscle function, and wound healing. , 1991, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[7]  P. Emery,et al.  Two phase randomised controlled clinical trial of postoperative oral dietary supplements in surgical patients. , 1997, Gut.

[8]  P. Soeters,et al.  Nutrition support for the surgical patient. , 2001 .

[9]  T. Garner,et al.  Cost-effectiveness Analysis of End-stage Renal Disease Treatments , 1987, Medical care.

[10]  F. Sassi,et al.  Equity and the economic evaluation of healthcare. , 2001, Health technology assessment.

[11]  F. D. de Charro,et al.  The utility of health at different stages in life: a quantitative approach. , 1993, Social science & medicine.

[12]  D. Silk,et al.  Perioperative nutrition: parenteral versus enteral. , 1998, Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care.

[13]  A. Wagstaff QALYs and the equity-efficiency trade-off. , 1991, Journal of health economics.

[14]  R. Wolfe,et al.  Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  J. Watters,et al.  Immediate postoperative enteral feeding results in impaired respiratory mechanics and decreased mobility. , 1997, Annals of surgery.

[16]  J. Hart Inequalities in Health, The Black Report , 1983 .

[17]  J. Macfie,et al.  Microbiology of bacterial translocation in humans , 1998, Gut.

[18]  Stephen J Lewis,et al.  Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Gary Oldman Nil by Mouth , 1999 .

[20]  G. A. Young,et al.  MALNUTRITION IN SURGICAL PATIENTS An Unrecognised Problem , 1977, The Lancet.