Quantifying the hydrodynamic stress for bioprocesses.

Hydrodynamic stress is an influential physical parameter for various bioprocesses, affecting the performance and viability of the living organisms. However, different approaches are in use in various computational and experimental studies to calculate this parameter (including its normal and shear subcomponents) from velocity fields without a consensus on which one is the most representative of its effect on living cells. In this letter, we investigate these different methods with clear definitions and provide our suggested approach which relies on the principal stress values providing a maximal distinction between the shear and normal components. Furthermore, a numerical comparison is presented using the computational fluid dynamics simulation of a stirred and sparged bioreactor. It is demonstrated that for this specific bioreactor, some of these methods exhibit quite similar patterns throughout the bioreactor-therefore can be considered equivalent-whereas some of them differ significantly.

[1]  K. Nonaka,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Hydrodynamics in the Single-Use Bioreactor Mobius® CellReady 3 L , 2022, Bioengineering.

[2]  J. Verwaeren,et al.  Predicting the Hydrodynamic Properties of a Bioreactor: Conditional Density Estimation as a Surrogate Model for CFD Simulations , 2022, Chemical Engineering Research and Design.

[3]  T. Wucherpfennig,et al.  Characterization of hydrodynamic stress in ambr250® bioreactor system and its impact on mammalian cell culture , 2021, Biochemical Engineering Journal.

[4]  Tianshu Liu,et al.  Estimation of the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy: A review , 2021 .

[5]  A. Mardinoğlu,et al.  Low Shear Stress Increases Recombinant Protein Production and High Shear Stress Increases Apoptosis in Human Cells , 2020, iScience.

[6]  Breanna S Borys,et al.  Overcoming bioprocess bottlenecks in the large-scale expansion of high-quality hiPSC aggregates in vertical-wheel stirred suspension bioreactors , 2020, Stem cell research & therapy.

[7]  Y. Zhuang,et al.  Novel scale-up strategy based on three-dimensional shear space for animal cell culture , 2020 .

[8]  Rahul Kumar,et al.  Computational fluid dynamic analysis of hydrodynamic shear stress generated by different impeller combinations in stirred bioreactor , 2019, Biochemical Engineering Journal.

[9]  Zhenlong Wang,et al.  Developing an orbitally shaken bioreactor featuring a hollow cylinder vessel wall , 2019, Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology.

[10]  Jin‐Ming Lin,et al.  Responses of Cellular Adhesion Strength and Stiffness to Fluid Shear Stress during Tumor Cell Rolling Motion. , 2019, ACS sensors.

[11]  L. Brandt,et al.  Study of hydrodynamics in wave bioreactors by computational fluid dynamics reveals a resonance phenomenon , 2019, Chemical Engineering Science.

[12]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Experimental and CFD physical characterization of animal cell bioreactors: From micro- to production scale , 2017 .

[13]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Determination of the maximum operating range of hydrodynamic stress in mammalian cell culture. , 2015, Journal of biotechnology.

[14]  Khandakar Niaz Morshed,et al.  Theory to Predict Shear Stress on Cells in Turbulent Blood Flow , 2014, PloS one.

[15]  Dieter Eibl,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics as a modern tool for engineering characterization of bioreactors , 2014 .

[16]  F. García-Ochoa,et al.  The effect of hydrodynamic stress on the growth of Xanthomonas campestris cultures in a stirred and sparged tank bioreactor , 2013, Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering.

[17]  Michael D. Henry,et al.  Resistance to Fluid Shear Stress Is a Conserved Biophysical Property of Malignant Cells , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Minimizing hydrodynamic stress in mammalian cell culture through the lobed Taylor-Couette bioreactor. , 2011, Biotechnology journal.

[19]  D. Dunstan,et al.  The effects of shear flow on protein structure and function , 2011, Biopolymers.

[20]  Regine Eibl,et al.  Engineering characteristics of a single‐use stirred bioreactor at bench‐scale: The Mobius CellReady 3L bioreactor as a case study , 2011 .

[21]  Feng Li,et al.  Cell culture processes for monoclonal antibody production , 2010, mAbs.

[22]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Induction of mammalian cell death by simple shear and extensional flows , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  R. Wengeler,et al.  Turbulent hydrodynamic stress induced dispersion and fragmentation of nanoscale agglomerates. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[24]  M. Latz,et al.  Hydrodynamic stimulation of dinoflagellate bioluminescence: a computational and experimental study , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  Maria J Barbosa,et al.  Hydrodynamic stress and lethal events in sparged microalgae cultures. , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[26]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  The Viscosity of a Fluid Containing Small Drops of Another Fluid , 1932 .

[27]  Sophie Papst,et al.  Computational Methods For Fluid Dynamics , 2016 .

[28]  Yang Liu,et al.  Effects of bubble–liquid two‐phase turbulent hydrodynamics on cell damage in sparged bioreactor , 2014, Biotechnology progress.

[29]  Ron Taticek,et al.  Bioprocess Equipment: Characterization of Energy Dissipation Rate and Its Potential to Damage Cells , 2004, Biotechnology progress.

[30]  Yu-Chen Hu,et al.  A Novel Rotating‐Shaft Bioreactor for Two‐Phase Cultivation of Tissue‐Engineered Cartilage , 2004, Biotechnology progress.

[31]  Andreas Deppe,et al.  Zum Verständnis der hydrodynamischen Beanspruchung von Partikeln in turbulenten Rührerströmungen , 2000 .