ENVIREM: An expanded set of bioclimatic and topographic variables increases flexibility and improves performance of ecological niche modeling

Species distribution modeling is a valuable tool with many applications across ecology and evolutionary biology. The selection of biologically meaningful environmental variables that determine relative habitat suitability is a crucial aspect of the modeling pipeline. The 19 bioclimatic variables from WorldClim are frequently employed, primarily because they are easily accessible and available globally for past, present and future climate scenarios. Yet, the availability of relatively few other comparable environmental datasets potentially limits our ability to select appropriate variables that will most successfully characterize a species’ distribution. We identified a set of 16 climatic and two topographic variables in the literature, which we call the ENVIREM dataset, many of which are likely to have direct relevance to ecological or physiological processes determining species distributions. We generated this set of variables at the same resolutions as WorldClim, for the present, mid-Holocene, and Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). For 20 North American vertebrate species, we then assessed whether including the ENVIREM variables led to improved species distribution models compared to models using only the existing WorldClim variables. We found that including the ENVIREM dataset in the pool of variables to select from led to substantial improvements in niche modeling performance in 13 out of 20 species. We also show that, when comparing models constructed with different environmental variables, differences in projected distributions were often greater in the LGM than in the present. These variables are worth consideration in species distribution modeling applications, especially as many of the variables have direct links to processes important for species ecology. We provide these variables for download at multiple resolutions and for several time periods at envirem.github.io. Furthermore, we have written the ‘envirem’ R package to facilitate the generation of these variables from other input datasets.

[1]  P. Comer,et al.  A New Map of Standardized Terrestrial Ecosystems of Africa , 2013 .

[2]  Paul D. Henne,et al.  Climate refugia: joint inference from fossil records, species distribution models and phylogeography. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[3]  D. Fabre,et al.  Global Bathymetry and Elevation Data at 30 Arc Seconds Resolution: SRTM30_PLUS , 2009 .

[4]  J. Guinan,et al.  Multiscale Terrain Analysis of Multibeam Bathymetry Data for Habitat Mapping on the Continental Slope , 2007 .

[5]  Tongli Wang,et al.  ClimateWNA—High-Resolution Spatial Climate Data for Western North America , 2012 .

[6]  C. Graham,et al.  The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions , 2006 .

[7]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Multimodel Inference , 2004 .

[8]  D. Richardson,et al.  Niche‐based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale , 2005, Global change biology.

[9]  Rubén G. Mateo,et al.  Impact of model complexity on cross-temporal transferability in Maxent species distribution models: An assessment using paleobotanical data , 2015 .

[10]  Matthew J. Smith,et al.  Protected areas network is not adequate to protect a critically endangered East Africa Chelonian: Modelling distribution of pancake tortoise, Malacochersus tornieri under current and future climates , 2013, bioRxiv.

[11]  P. Daget Le bioclimat Mediterraneen: Analyse des formes climatiques par le systeme d'Emberger , 1977, Vegetatio.

[12]  Hiroyasu Hasumi,et al.  K-1 Coupled GCM (MIROC) Description , 2004 .

[13]  V. Barve,et al.  Variation in niche and distribution model performance: The need for a priori assessment of key causal factors , 2012 .

[14]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[15]  Gordon H. Rodda,et al.  Challenges in Identifying Sites Climatically Matched to the Native Ranges of Animal Invaders , 2011, PloS one.

[16]  D. Nogues‐Bravo,et al.  Applications of species distribution modeling to paleobiology , 2011 .

[17]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Ecological niche modelling and prioritizing areas for species reintroductions , 2006, Oryx.

[18]  Robert J. Hijmans,et al.  Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling , 2015 .

[19]  Robert A. Boria,et al.  ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models , 2014 .

[20]  S. Nielsen,et al.  Velocity of climate change algorithms for guiding conservation and management , 2015, Global change biology.

[21]  Andy Jarvis,et al.  Downscaling Global Circulation Model Outputs: The Delta Method Decision and Policy Analysis Working Paper No. 1 , 2010 .

[22]  Carsten F Dormann,et al.  Squares of different sizes: effect of geographical projection on model parameter estimates in species distribution modeling , 2015, Ecology and evolution.

[23]  Sara Varela,et al.  EcoClimate: a database of climate data from multiple models for past, present, and future for macroecologists and biogeographers , 2015 .

[24]  M. Austin Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling , 2002 .

[25]  W. Jetz,et al.  Remotely Sensed High-Resolution Global Cloud Dynamics for Predicting Ecosystem and Biodiversity Distributions , 2016, PLoS biology.

[26]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[27]  C. Willmott,et al.  A More Rational Climatic Moisture Index , 1992 .

[28]  Jason L. Brown,et al.  Spatially explicit models of dynamic histories: examination of the genetic consequences of Pleistocene glaciation and recent climate change on the American Pika , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[29]  Eduardo Pineda,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models to predict amphibian species richness patterns. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[30]  Jill J. Cress,et al.  A New Map of Standardized Terrestrial Ecosystems of the Conterminous United States , 2009 .

[31]  Antonio Trabucco,et al.  Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for Clean Development Mechanism afforestation and reforestation , 2008 .

[32]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions , 2011 .

[33]  R. Guralnick,et al.  BioGeomancer: Automated Georeferencing to Map the World's Biodiversity Data , 2006, PLoS biology.

[34]  Tongli Wang,et al.  Locally Downscaled and Spatially Customizable Climate Data for Historical and Future Periods for North America , 2016, PloS one.

[35]  Jason L. Brown,et al.  Integrating statistical genetic and geospatial methods brings new power to phylogeography. , 2011, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[36]  C. Daly,et al.  A knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate , 2002 .

[37]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[38]  Carmen Revenga,et al.  Geospatial Indicators of Emerging Water Stress: An Application to Africa , 2005, Ambio.

[39]  Antonio Trabucco,et al.  Carbon, land and water: a global analysis of the hydrologic dimensions of climate change mitigation through afforestation / reforestation , 2006 .

[40]  C. Nilsson,et al.  The usefulness of elevation as a predictor variable in species distribution modelling , 2012 .

[41]  W. Wilhelm,et al.  Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations , 1997 .

[42]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Multiple sources of uncertainty affect metrics for ranking conservation risk under climate change , 2015 .

[43]  D. Alvarado-Serrano,et al.  Exploring the population genetic consequences of the colonization process with spatio‐temporally explicit models: insights from coupled ecological, demographic and genetic models in montane grasshoppers , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[44]  L. Knowles,et al.  Tests of species‐specific models reveal the importance of drought in postglacial range shifts of a Mediterranean‐climate tree: insights from integrative distributional, demographic and coalescent modelling and ABC model selection , 2016, Molecular ecology.

[45]  A. S. Dykea,et al.  The Laurentide and Innuitian ice sheets during the Last Glacial Maximum , 2001 .

[46]  Bruce L. Webber,et al.  CliMond: global high‐resolution historical and future scenario climate surfaces for bioclimatic modelling , 2012 .

[47]  Rob H. G. Jongman,et al.  A high-resolution bioclimate map of the world: a unifying framework for global biodiversity research and monitoring , 2013 .

[48]  A. Márcia Barbosa,et al.  fuzzySim: applying fuzzy logic to binary similarity indices in ecology , 2015 .

[49]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Adopting a spatially explicit perspective to study the mysterious fairy circles of Namibia , 2015 .

[50]  D. Edwards,et al.  INTEGRATIVE TESTING OF HOW ENVIRONMENTS FROM THE PAST TO THE PRESENT SHAPE GENETIC STRUCTURE ACROSS LANDSCAPES , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[51]  S. Schmidtlein,et al.  Alien Invasive Slider Turtle in Unpredicted Habitat: A Matter of Niche Shift or of Predictors Studied? , 2009, PloS one.

[52]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Constraints on interpretation of ecological niche models by limited environmental ranges on calibration areas , 2012 .

[53]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Comparing niche- and process-based models to reduce prediction uncertainty in species range shifts under climate change. , 2009, Ecology.

[54]  A. Peterson,et al.  Locating Pleistocene Refugia: Comparing Phylogeographic and Ecological Niche Model Predictions , 2007, PloS one.

[55]  B. J,et al.  Soil regionalisation by means of terrain analysis and process parameterisation , 2002 .

[56]  K. Bollmann,et al.  Selecting from correlated climate variables: a major source of uncertainty for predicting species distributions under climate change , 2013 .

[57]  Chad W. Higgins,et al.  Evapotranspiration: A process driving mass transport and energy exchange in the soil‐plant‐atmosphere‐climate system , 2012 .

[58]  Jessica C. Stanton,et al.  Combining static and dynamic variables in species distribution models under climate change , 2012 .

[59]  W. Collins,et al.  The Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3) , 2006 .

[60]  Stéphane Joost,et al.  Very high resolution digital elevation models : Do they improve models of plant species distribution? , 2006 .

[61]  M. Kearney,et al.  Modelling species distributions without using species distributions: the cane toad in Australia under current and future climates , 2008 .

[62]  Pascal O. Title,et al.  Rates of climatic niche evolution are correlated with species richness in a large and ecologically diverse radiation of songbirds. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[63]  Michael Bock,et al.  System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4 , 2015 .

[64]  D. Alvarado-Serrano,et al.  Ecological niche models in phylogeographic studies: applications, advances and precautions , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[65]  M. Austin,et al.  Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: variable selection and scale , 2011 .

[66]  A. Peterson,et al.  Environmental data sets matter in ecological niche modelling: an example with Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri. , 2007 .

[67]  Damaris Zurell,et al.  Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance , 2013 .

[68]  John Wieczorek,et al.  Darwin Core: An Evolving Community-Developed Biodiversity Data Standard , 2012, PloS one.

[69]  Dan L. Warren,et al.  Incorporating model complexity and spatial sampling bias into ecological niche models of climate change risks faced by 90 California vertebrate species of concern , 2014 .

[70]  E. Davis,et al.  Ecological niche models of mammalian glacial refugia show consistent bias , 2014 .

[71]  B. Huntley,et al.  Potential impacts of climatic change on the breeding and non‐breeding ranges and migration distance of European Sylvia warblers , 2009 .

[72]  M. Bell,et al.  Erosion of the Laurentide Region of North America by Glacial and Glaciofluvial Processes , 1985, Quaternary Research.

[73]  M. Turelli,et al.  Environmental Niche Equivalency versus Conservatism: Quantitative Approaches to Niche Evolution , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[74]  D. Neale,et al.  From genotype to phenotype: unraveling the complexities of cold adaptation in forest trees , 2003 .

[75]  C. W. Thornthwaite An approach toward a rational classification of climate. , 1948 .

[76]  T. Schoener The Anolis Lizards of Bimini: Resource Partitioning in a Complex Fauna , 1968 .

[77]  George H. Hargreaves,et al.  Irrigation Water Requirements for Senegal River Basin , 1985 .

[78]  Dan L Warren,et al.  Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[79]  Andreas Hamann,et al.  A Comprehensive, High-Resolution Database of Historical and Projected Climate Surfaces for Western North America , 2013 .

[80]  B. Stevens,et al.  Atmospheric component of the MPI‐M Earth System Model: ECHAM6 , 2013 .

[81]  Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens,et al.  spThin: an R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models , 2015 .

[82]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: An implementation with Maxent , 2011 .

[83]  Robert P. Guralnick,et al.  Accelerating the Digitization of Biodiversity Research Specimens through Online Public Participation , 2015 .

[84]  ENVIREM: An expanded set of bioclimatic and topographic variables increases flexibility and improves performance of ecological niche modeling , 2016 .

[85]  Nicholas W. Synes,et al.  Choice of predictor variables as a source of uncertainty in continental‐scale species distribution modelling under climate change , 2011 .

[86]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  VertNet: A New Model for Biodiversity Data Sharing , 2010, PLoS biology.

[87]  J. Wiens,et al.  What explains patterns of species richness? The relative importance of climatic‐niche evolution, morphological evolution, and ecological limits in salamanders , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[88]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions , 2006 .

[89]  Walter Jetz,et al.  A global, remote sensing‐based characterization of terrestrial habitat heterogeneity for biodiversity and ecosystem modelling , 2015 .

[90]  M. Araújo,et al.  Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling , 2006 .

[91]  C. Randin,et al.  Very high resolution environmental predictors in species distribution models , 2014 .

[92]  W. Thuiller Patterns and uncertainties of species' range shifts under climate change , 2004 .

[93]  D. Warren,et al.  TESTING ECOLOGICAL EXPLANATIONS FOR BIOGEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARIES , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[94]  C. Augspurger,et al.  Process-based modeling of species' distributions: what limits temperate tree species' range boundaries? , 2007, Ecology.

[95]  Robert P. Anderson,et al.  Making better Maxent models of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and evaluation , 2014 .