Factors associated with proportions and miles of bicycling for transportation and recreation in six small US cities

The majority of bicycling in the US is for recreation rather than transportation purposes but few studies have examined the question of bicycling purpose. We use data from an online survey conducted in 2006 in six small cities in the western US to examine factors affecting bicycling for transportation compared to bicycling for recreation. The results indicate that individual, social-environment, and physical-environment factors have important influences on the balance between transportation and recreational bicycling and on miles of bicycling for each purpose. Bicycling comfort and an aversion to driving are associated with more transportation bicycling. A culture of utilitarian bicycling and short distances to destinations are also key factors for transportation bicycling. Bicycle infrastructure appears to play an indirect role through its effect on perceived bicycling safety and through the self-selection effect, by attracting bicycling-inclined people to bicycling-supportive communities.

[1]  K. Glanz,et al.  Health behavior and health education : theory, research, and practice , 1991 .

[2]  S. Handy,et al.  Factors associated with bicycle ownership and use: a study of six small U.S. cities , 2010 .

[3]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Logistic Regression Using the SAS System : Theory and Application , 1999 .

[4]  R. Pate,et al.  Correlates of recreational and transportation physical activity among adults in a New England community. , 2003, Preventive medicine.

[5]  L. Dijkstra,et al.  Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from The Netherlands and Germany. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[6]  Christine M. Hoehner,et al.  Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[7]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Testing the Accuracy, Usefulness, and Significance of Probabilistic Choice Models: An Information-Theoretic Approach , 1978, Oper. Res..

[8]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Testing the Accuracy , 1977 .

[9]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[10]  John Pucher,et al.  Making Walking and Cycling Safer: Lessons from Europe , 2000 .

[11]  M. Hardy Regression with dummy variables , 1993 .

[12]  F J van Lenthe,et al.  Area variation in recreational cycling in Melbourne: a compositional or contextual effect? , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[13]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  MODELING EMPLOYEES' PERCEPTIONS AND PROPORTIONAL PREFERENCES OF WORK LOCATIONS: THE REGULAR WORKPLACE AND TELECOMMUTING ALTERNATIVES. IN: TRANSPORT AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[14]  Ilse de Bourdeaudhuij,et al.  Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with cycling for transport among a working population. , 2007, Health education research.

[15]  B. Saelens,et al.  Built environment correlates of walking: a review. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  J. Sallis,et al.  Ecological models of health behavior. , 2008 .

[17]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany , 2008 .

[18]  C. Bhat,et al.  Frequency of Bicycle Commuting: Internet-Based Survey Analysis , 2004 .

[19]  M. Wardman,et al.  Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data , 2007 .

[20]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[21]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Fifty Years of Bicycle Policy in Davis, California , 2008 .