A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume.

Community assembly theory suggests that two processes affect the distribution of trait values within communities: competition and habitat filtering. Within a local community, competition leads to ecological differentiation of coexisting species, while habitat filtering reduces the spread of trait values, reflecting shared ecological tolerances. Many statistical tests for the effects of competition exist in the literature, but measures of habitat filtering are less well-developed. Here, we present convex hull volume, a construct from computational geometry, which provides an n-dimensional measure of the volume of trait space occupied by species in a community. Combined with ecological null models, this measure offers a useful test for habitat filtering. We use convex hull volume and a null model to analyze California woody-plant trait and community data. Our results show that observed plant communities occupy less trait space than expected from random assembly, a result consistent with habitat filtering.

[1]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF LEAF FORM: ASSESSING THE RELATIVE ROLES OF SELECTIVE PRESSURES AND PHYLOGENETIC CONSTRAINTS , 2008 .

[2]  J. Keeley.  Seed germination and life history syndromes in the California chaparral , 1991, The Botanical Review.

[3]  M. Hanna.  Myology, third edition , 2005, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[4]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  A Brief History of Seed Size , 2005, Science.

[5]  J. Bastow Wilson,et al.  Evidence for limiting similarity in a sand dune community , 2004 .

[6]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents , 2004 .

[7]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[8]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  HOW DO DIFFERENT MEASURES OF FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY PERFORM , 2004 .

[9]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  FUNCTIONAL STRATEGIES OF CHAPARRAL SHRUBS IN RELATION TO SEASONAL WATER DEFICIT AND DISTURBANCE , 2004 .

[10]  C. McClain,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL DISPARITY AS A BIODIVERSITY METRIC IN LOWER BATHYALAND ABYSSAL GASTROPOD ASSEMBLAGES , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[12]  D. Coomes,et al.  Colonization, tolerance, competition and seed-size variation within functional groups , 2003 .

[13]  John P. O'Neill,et al.  A MORPHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF AVIAN COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION , 2003 .

[14]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[15]  M. Westoby,et al.  Leaves at low versus high rainfall: coordination of structure, lifespan and physiology. , 2002, The New phytologist.

[16]  John M. Goodrich,et al.  Effects of Roads and Human Disturbance on Amur Tigers , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[17]  P. Reich,et al.  Generality of leaf trait relationships: a test across six biomes: Ecology , 1999 .

[18]  J. Cornelissen.  A triangular relationship between leaf size and seed size among woody species: allometry, ontogeny, ecology and taxonomy , 1999, Oecologia.

[19]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Ecological assembly rules : perspectives, advances, retreats , 1999 .

[20]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Leaf Size, Sapling Allometry, and Corner's Rules: Phylogeny and Correlated Evolution in Maples (Acer) , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[21]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Community Assembly Rules, Morphological Dispersion, and the Coexistence of Plant Species , 1998 .

[22]  M. Foote.  THE EVOLUTION OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIVERSITY , 1997 .

[23]  A. Lugo,et al.  Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests , 1997 .

[24]  David P. Dobkin,et al.  The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls , 1996, TOMS.

[25]  Richard Law,et al.  PERMANENCE AND THE ASSEMBLY OF ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 1996 .

[26]  N. Gotelli,et al.  NULL MODELS IN ECOLOGY , 1996 .

[27]  James A. Young,et al.  Seeds of woody plants in North America , 1993 .

[28]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology , 1992 .

[29]  Michael Foote,et al.  Rarefaction analysis of morphological and taxonomic diversity , 1992, Paleobiology.

[30]  E. Pianka,et al.  Organization in Natural Assemblages of Desert Lizards and Tropical Fishes , 1990 .

[31]  Michael Ian Shamos,et al.  Computational geometry: an introduction , 1985 .

[32]  A. G. Valk,et al.  Succession in Wetlands: A Gleasonian Appraoch , 1981 .

[33]  L. Lawlor,et al.  Structure and Stability in Natural and Randomly Constructed Competitive Communities , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[34]  H. G. Baker.  Seed Weight in Relation to Environmental Conditions in California , 1972 .

[35]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.