Pressures and Oscillation Frequencies Generated by Bubble-Positive Expiratory Pressure Devices

BACKGROUND: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) devices are used to assist with airway clearance. Little is known about the therapist-made or commercially available bubble-PEP devices. The aim of this study was to determine the end-expiratory pressures (cm H2O) and oscillation frequencies (Hz) generated when a range of flows were applied to the therapist-made bubble-PEP devices (Bubble-PEP-3cm and Bubble-PEP-0cm) and commercial bubble-PEP devices (AguaPEP, Hydrapep, and Therabubble). METHODS: This was a bench-top experimental study using a compressed air source, flow rotameter (flows of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 L/min), and pressure transducer. Data were collected using a data acquisition device with PhysioDAQxs software and analyzed with Breathalyser software to determine the pressures and oscillation frequencies generated by 5 bubble-PEP devices. Each flow was constant for a 30-s measurement period, and measurements were repeated in triplicate. The 5 devices were: a therapist-made Bubble-PEP-3cm device (filled with 13 cm of water, tubing resting 3 cm from the base of the container); the therapist-made Bubble-PEP-0cm (filled with 10 cm of water, tubing resting at the base of the container); and the AguaPEP, Hydrapep, and Therabubble devices with water to the 10 cm mark on the containers. RESULTS: Flows of 5–25 L/min produced the following mean ± SD PEP and oscillation frequencies (Hz): the Bubble-PEP-3cm produced PEP of 10.4 ± 0.14 to 10.8 ± 0.24 cm H2O, oscillations between 13 and 17 Hz; the Bubble-PEP-0cm produced PEP of 10.9 ± 0.01 to 12.9 ± 0.08 cm H2O, oscillations between 12 and 14 Hz; the AguaPEP produced PEP from 9.7 ± 0.02 to 11.5 ± 0.02 cm H2O, oscillations between 11 and 17 Hz; the Hydrapep produced PEP of 9.6 ± 0.35 to 10.7 ± 0.39 cm H2O, oscillations between 14 and 17 Hz; and the Therabubble produced PEP from 8.6 ± 0.01 to 12.8 ± 0.03 cm H2O, oscillations between 14 and 17 Hz. CONCLUSIONS: Bubble-PEP-3cm maintained the most stable pressure throughout the range of flows tested. All devices investigated produced similar oscillation frequencies.

[1]  J. Alison,et al.  Therapist-Made Bubble-Positive Expiratory Pressure: A Survey of Physiotherapists in Australia , 2016 .

[2]  F. Michel,et al.  Laboratory Evaluation of Four Different Devices for Secretion Mobilization: Acapella Choice, Green and Blue Versus Water Bottle , 2014, Respiratory Care.

[3]  C. Johnston,et al.  The current use of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy by public hospital physiotherapists in New South Wales , 2013 .

[4]  M. Donadio,et al.  Optimum design parameters for a therapist-constructed positive-expiratory-pressure therapy bottle device. , 2009, Respiratory care.

[5]  L. Denehy,et al.  Current Australian and New Zealand physiotherapy practice in the management of patients with bronchiectasis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , 2008 .

[6]  G. Johansson,et al.  Physiological responses to positive expiratory pressure breathing: a comparison of the PEP bottle and the PEP mask. , 2007, Respiratory care.

[7]  J. Alison,et al.  Physiological effects of vibration in subjects with cystic fibrosis , 2006, European Respiratory Journal.

[8]  R. Chatburn,et al.  Performance comparison of two oscillating positive expiratory pressure devices: Acapella versus Flutter. , 2003, Respiratory care.

[9]  J. Bradley,et al.  THE CURRENT PHYSIOTHERAPY MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH BRONCHIECTASIS: A UK SURVEY , 2002, International journal of clinical practice.

[10]  M. Chilvers,et al.  Analysis of ciliary beat pattern and beat frequency using digital high speed imaging: comparison with the photomultiplier and photodiode methods , 2000, Thorax.

[11]  M. King,et al.  Sputum rheology changes in cystic fibrosis lung disease following two different types of physiotherapy: flutter vs autogenic drainage. , 1998, Chest.

[12]  J. Evans,et al.  Forced expirations against a variable resistance: A new chest physiotherapy method in cystic fibrosis , 1986, Pediatric pulmonology.

[13]  M. Falk,et al.  Positive expiratory pressure (PEP-mask) physiotherapy improves ventilation and reduces volume of trapped gas in cystic fibrosis. , 1985, Bulletin europeen de physiopathologie respiratoire.

[14]  M. King,et al.  Enhanced tracheal mucus clearance with high frequency chest wall compression. , 1983, The American review of respiratory disease.

[15]  J. Andersen,et al.  Recruiting collapsed lung through collateral channels with positive end-expiratory pressure. , 1979, Scandinavian journal of respiratory diseases.