Numerical exploration of mixing and combustion in a dual-mode combustor with backward-facing steps

Abstract Dual-mode scramjet combustor is the crucial component for the combined cycle engine of space mission vehicles. The Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations, Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model and the finite-rate reaction model have been utilized to investigate the mixing and combustion in a dual-mode combustor with backward-facing steps, and the species distributions and the Mach number profile of a turbulent diffusion combustion problem have been employed to validate the numerical approach. Moreover, the influences of the injection strategy and the fuel equivalence ratio arrangement on its mixing and combustion flow fields have been explored. The obtained results show that the vertical injection is beneficial for mode transition, and an obvious high pressure region is generated with the vertical injection strategy. Accordingly, its mass-weighted average Mach number drops more sharply. The lower total equivalence ratio is beneficial for the mixing augmentation, as well the smaller fuel equivalence ratio discrepancy. However, the larger total equivalence ratio is beneficial for the mode transition.

[1]  Jianwen Xing,et al.  Experimental and computational study on combustion performance of a kerosene fueled dual-mode scramjet engine , 2015 .

[2]  Sadatake Tomioka,et al.  Performance of a Dual-Mode Combustor with Multistaged Fuel Injection , 2006 .

[3]  Xianggeng Wei,et al.  Large eddy simulation of flame structure and combustion mode in a hydrogen fueled supersonic combustor , 2015 .

[4]  Ye Tian,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigations of combustion mode transition in a direct–connect scramjet combustor , 2015 .

[5]  Lin Ma,et al.  Flow-Field Analysis of a Typical Hydrogen-Fueled Dual-Mode Scramjet Combustor , 2012 .

[6]  Michael K. Smart,et al.  Mode Change Characteristics of a Three-Dimensional Scramjet at Mach 8 , 2013 .

[7]  Christopher P. Goyne,et al.  Dual-Mode Combustion Experiments with an Integrated Aeroramp-Injector/Plasma-Torch Igniter , 2008 .

[8]  Zhenguo Wang,et al.  Influences of H2O mass fraction and chemical kinetics mechanism on the turbulent diffusion combustion of H2–O2 in supersonic flows , 2012 .

[9]  Jun Liu,et al.  Influences of the turbulence model and the slot width on the transverse slot injection flow field in supersonic flows , 2012 .

[10]  Manmohan Vishwakarma,et al.  Experimental study of mixing enhancement using pylon in supersonic flow , 2016 .

[12]  Corin Segal,et al.  The Scramjet Engine: Processes and Characteristics , 2009 .

[13]  Numerical Simulation of Ignition and Combustion of Ethylene in a Supersonic Model Combustor with a Reduced Kinetic Mechanism , 2013 .

[14]  Li Yan,et al.  Survey on the mode transition technique in combined cycle propulsion systems , 2014 .

[15]  Li Yan,et al.  Numerical investigation on the ram–scram transition mechanism in a strut-based dual-mode scramjet combustor , 2016 .

[16]  V. Babu,et al.  Investigation of the effect of chemistry models on the numerical predictions of the supersonic combustion of hydrogen , 2009 .

[17]  Wei Huang,et al.  Influence of jet-to-crossflow pressure ratio on nonreacting and reacting processes in a scramjet combustor with backward-facing steps , 2014 .

[18]  Anatole P. Kurkov,et al.  An Analytical and Experimental Study of Supersonic Combustion of Hydrogen in Vitiated Air Stream , 1973 .

[19]  Gautam Choubey,et al.  Computational Analysis of Hypersonic Combustor Using Strut Injector at Flight Mach 7 , 2015 .

[20]  Sean M. Torrez,et al.  New Method for Computing Performance of Choked Reacting Flows and Ram-to-Scram Transition , 2013 .

[21]  Sadatake Tomioka,et al.  Experimental Study on Combustion Modes in a Supersonic Combustor , 2011 .

[22]  Wen Bao,et al.  Nonlinear characteristics and detection of combustion modes for a hydrocarbon fueled scramjet , 2015 .

[23]  Wei Huang.  Transverse jet in supersonic crossflows , 2016 .

[24]  Wen Bao,et al.  Experimental study on combustion modes and thrust performance of a staged-combustor of the scramjet with dual-strut , 2016 .

[25]  Lin Ma,et al.  Effect of geometric parameters on the drag of the cavity flameholder based on the variance analysis method , 2012 .

[26]  Jing Lei,et al.  Numerical investigation on the shock wave transition in a three-dimensional scramjet isolator , 2011 .

[27]  Wei Huang,et al.  Design exploration of three-dimensional transverse jet in a supersonic crossflow based on data mining and multi-objective design optimization approaches , 2014 .

[28]  Adrian S. Pudsey,et al.  Influence of common modeling choices for high-speed transverse jet-interaction simulations , 2013 .

[29]  Wen Bao,et al.  Dynamic Characteristics of Combustion Mode Transitions in a Strut-Based Scramjet Combustor Model , 2013 .

[30]  Wei Huang,et al.  Parametric effects on the combustion flow field of a typical strut-based scramjet combustor , 2011 .

[31]  Wen Bao,et al.  A model of mode transition logic in dual-mode scramjet engines , 2016 .

[32]  Li Yan,et al.  Progress in research on mixing techniques for transverse injection flow fields in supersonic crossflows , 2013, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A.

[33]  Matthew Fotia,et al.  Ram-Scram Transition and Flame/Shock-Train Interactions in a Model Scramjet Experiment , 2013 .

[34]  Daren Yu,et al.  Hysteresis Phenomenon of Mode Transition in Ramjet Engines and Its Topological Rules , 2012 .