Remote Magnetic Navigation to Guide Endocardial and Epicardial Catheter Mapping of Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia

Background— The present study examines the safety and feasibility of using a remote magnetic navigation system to perform endocardial and epicardial substrate-based mapping and radiofrequency ablation in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT). Methods and Results— Using the magnetic navigation system, we performed 27 procedures on 24 consecutive patients with a history of VT related to myocardial infarction, dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or sarcoidosis. Electroanatomic mapping of the left ventricular, right ventricular, and ventricular epicardial surfaces was constructed in 24, 10, and 12 patients, respectively. Complete-chamber VT activation maps were created in 4 patients. A total of 77 VTs were inducible, of which 21 were targeted during VT with the remotely navigated radiofrequency ablation catheter alone. With a combination of entrainment and activation mapping, 17 of 21 VTs (81%) were successfully terminated in a mean of 8.4±8.2 seconds; for the remainder, irrigated radiofrequency ablation was necessary. The mean fluoroscopy times for endocardial and epicardial mapping were 27±23 seconds (range, 0 to 105 seconds) and 18±18 seconds (range, 0 to 49 seconds), respectively. In concert with a manually navigated irrigated ablation catheter, 75 of 77 VTs (97%) were ultimately ablated. Four patients underwent a second procedure for recurrent VT, 3 with the magnetic navigation system. After 1.2 procedures per patient, VT did not recur during a mean follow-up of 7±3 months (range, 2 to 12 months). Conclusions— The present study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of remote catheter navigation to perform substrate mapping of scar-related VT in a wide range of disease states with a minimal amount of fluoroscopy exposure.

[1]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. , 1999, Circulation.

[2]  Mercedes Ortiz,et al.  Ablation of electrograms with an isolated, delayed component as treatment of unmappable monomorphic ventricular tachycardias in patients with structural heart disease. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  V. Santinelli,et al.  Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  F. Marchlinski,et al.  Linear ablation lesions for control of unmappable ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. , 2000, Circulation.

[5]  John L. Sapp,et al.  Subxiphoid Surgical Approach for Epicardial Catheter-Based Mapping and Ablation in Patients With Prior Cardiac Surgery or Difficult Pericardial Access , 2004, Circulation.

[6]  Heart catheterization in a neonate by interacting magnetic fields: a new and simple method of catheter guidance. , 1991, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[7]  Eduardo Sosa,et al.  Pericardial Anatomy for the Interventional Electrophysiologist , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[8]  S. Ernst,et al.  Initial Experience With Remote Catheter Ablation Using a Novel Magnetic Navigation System: Magnetic Remote Catheter Ablation , 2004, Circulation.

[9]  M. Eldar,et al.  A Closed‐Chest Pig Model of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia , 1994, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  Michael Talcott,et al.  Magnetic guidance system for cardiac electrophysiology: a prospective trial of safety and efficacy in humans. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  A. Russo,et al.  Ventricular Tachycardia/Ventricular Fibrillation Ablation in the Setting of Ischemic Heart Disease , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[12]  Henry R. Halperin,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Multidetector Computed Tomography Viability Imaging After Myocardial Infarction: Characterization of Myocyte Death, Microvascular Obstruction, and Chronic Scar , 2006, Circulation.

[13]  W. Stevenson,et al.  Catheter Ablation in Patients With Multiple and Unstable Ventricular Tachycardias After Myocardial Infarction: Short Ablation Lines Guided by Reentry Circuit Isthmuses and Sinus Rhythm Mapping , 2001, Circulation.

[14]  Jeremy N Ruskin,et al.  Combined Epicardial and Endocardial Electroanatomic Mapping in a Porcine Model of Healed Myocardial Infarction , 2003, Circulation.

[15]  S M Dillon,et al.  Electroanatomic left ventricular mapping in the porcine model of healed anterior myocardial infarction. Correlation with intracardiac echocardiography and pathological analysis. , 1999, Circulation.

[16]  M. Josephson,et al.  Use of Electrogram Characteristics During Sinus Rhythm to Delineate the Endocardial Scar in a Porcine Model of Healed Myocardial Infarction , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[17]  J. Ruskin,et al.  Short-term results of substrate mapping and radiofrequency ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia using a saline-irrigated catheter. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  J. Ramires,et al.  Nonsurgical transthoracic epicardial catheter ablation to treat recurrent ventricular tachycardia occurring late after myocardial infarction. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  R. Cury,et al.  Mapping epicardial fat with multi-detector computed tomography to facilitate percutaneous transepicardial arrhythmia ablation. , 2006, European journal of radiology.