California households' willingness to pay for ‘green’ electronics

Abstract Concerns about rapid increases in the volume of electronic waste (e-waste) and its potential toxicity have sharpened policy makers' interest for extended producer responsibility to encourage manufacturers of consumer electronic devices (CEDs) to ‘design for the environment’. This paper examines consumer willingness to pay for ‘green’ electronics based on a 2004 mail survey of California households. Using ordered logit models, it was found that significant predictors of willingness to pay for ‘greener’ computers and cell phones include age, income, education, beliefs about the role of government for improving environmental quality, as well as environmental attitudes and behaviors, but neither gender nor political affiliation. Although most respondents are willing to pay only a 1% premium for ‘greener’ CEDs, innovation and EU directives may soon make them competitive with conventional CEDs.

[1]  Jamey Menard,et al.  Market Participation and Willingness to Pay for Environmentally Certified Hardwood Products , 2002 .

[2]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Edition , 2005 .

[3]  H. Varian,et al.  On the private provision of public goods , 1986 .

[4]  J. Edward Jackson,et al.  A User's Guide to Principal Components. , 1991 .

[5]  A. Freeman,et al.  The measurement of environmental and resource values , 1992 .

[6]  B. Roe.  US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity , 2001 .

[7]  Russell V. Lenth,et al.  Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata (rev.) , 2005 .

[8]  J. A. Calvin.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1998 .

[9]  Athanasios Krystallis,et al.  Consumers' willingness to pay for organic food: Factors that affect it and variation per organic product type , 2005 .

[10]  A. Oladele.  HOUSEHOLD WILLINGNESS TO RECYCLE ELECTRONIC WASTE - An Application to , 2006 .

[11]  Clifford Winston,et al.  Econometric Issues in Estimating Consumer Preferences from Stated Preference Data: A Case Study of the Value of Automobile Travel Time , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[12]  J. Day,et al.  Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2003 , 2005 .

[13]  G. Dunteman.  Principal Components Analysis , 1989 .

[14]  Marija Radman,et al.  Consumer consumption and perception of organic products in Croatia , 2005 .

[15]  Brian Ellis.  Environmental issues in electronics manufacturing: a review , 2000 .

[16]  Margaret Walls,et al.  Waste, recycling, and “Design for Environment”: Roles for markets and policy instruments , 2005 .

[17]  Cheryl L. Brown,et al.  Consumers' preferences for locally produced food: A study in southeast Missouri , 2003 .

[18]  Kristina Ek.  Public and private attitudes towards “green” electricity: the case of Swedish wind power , 2005 .

[19]  Lauren Darby,et al.  Household recycling behaviour and attitudes towards the disposal of small electrical and electronic equipment , 2005 .

[20]  Bentham Paulos,et al.  Green power in perspective: lessons from green marketing of consumer goods , 1998 .

[21]  R. Kominski.  Computer Use in the United States: 1984. , 1988 .

[22]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence , 1980 .

[23]  Guy Garrod,et al.  Economic Valuation of the Environment: Methods and Case Studies , 1999 .

[24]  J. E. Jackson.  A User's Guide to Principal Components , 1991 .

[25]  Robert D. Weaver,et al.  Prosocial Behavior: Private Contributions to Agriculture's Impact on the Environment , 2008 .

[26]  Rebecca P. Judge,et al.  MOTIVATING RECYCLING: A MARGINAL COST ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[27]  Floyd J. Fowler,et al.  Survey Research Methods , 1984 .

[28]  David J. Hart,et al.  Greening London's black cabs: a study of driver's preferences for fuel cell taxis , 2004 .

[29]  Pamela L. Alreck,et al.  The Survey Research Handbook , 1984 .

[30]  Claire A. Montgomery,et al.  Changes in attitudes about importance of and willingness to pay for salmon recovery in Oregon. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[31]  M. Laroche,et al.  Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products , 2001 .

[32]  J. Stavins.  Estimating demand elasticities in a differentiated product industry : the personal computer market , 1997 .

[33]  Ryan Wiser,et al.  Public goods and private interests: Understanding non-residential demand for green power , 2001 .

[34]  T. Gärling,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: CONCEPTUAL DEFINITIONS, MEASUREMENT METHODS, AND RESEARCH FINDINGS , 1999 .

[35]  P. Stern,et al.  Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships , 1995 .

[36]  Patrick De Pelsmacker,et al.  Do Consumers Care about Ethics? Willingness to Pay for Fair‐Trade Coffee , 2005 .

[37]  Margaret Walls,et al.  The Role of Economics in Extended Producer Responsibility: Making Policy Choices and Setting Policy Goals , 2003 .

[38]  J. Edward Jackson,et al.  A User's Guide to Principal Components: Jackson/User's Guide to Principal Components , 2004 .

[39]  Carsten Schroeder,et al.  Altruism, Warm Glow and the Willingness-to-Donate for Green Electricity: An Artefactual Field Experiment , 2005 .

[40]  S. Gössling,et al.  A target group-specific approach to "green" power retailing: students as consumers of renewable energy , 2005 .

[41]  William H. Desvousges,et al.  Estimating Stated Preferences with Rated-Pair Data: Environmental, Health, and Employment Effects of Energy Programs , 1997 .

[42]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: Participation in a green electricity program , 2003 .

[43]  Hilary Nixon,et al.  Financing electronic waste recycling Californian households' willingness to pay advanced recycling fees. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[44]  Kristen Lyons,et al.  Choosing organics: a path analysis of factors underlying the selection of organic food among Australian consumers , 2004, Appetite.

[45]  Shan-Shan Chung,et al.  The Attitudinal Differences in Source Separation and Waste Reduction between the General Public and the Housewives in Hong Kong , 1996 .

[46]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  Factors Influencing Community Residents' Participation in Commingled Curbside Recycling Programs , 1994 .

[47]  R. H. Wiser.  Public goods and private interests: understanding non-residential demand for green power , 2002 .

[48]  R. Brant.  Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. , 1990, Biometrics.

[49]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation , 2003 .

[50]  Michael P Wilson,et al.  Green Chemistry in California: A Framework for Leadership in Chemicals Policy and Innovation , 2007, New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS.

[51]  Makoto Akai,et al.  Willingness to pay for green electricity in Japan as estimated through contingent valuation method , 2004 .

[52]  Chongwoo Choe,et al.  An Economic Analysis of Household Waste Management , 1999 .

[53]  Oladele A. Ogunseitan,et al.  Adopting Lead‐Free Electronics: Policy Differences and Knowledge Gaps , 2004 .

[54]  Maria L. Loureiro,et al.  Preferences and willingness to pay for GM labeling policies , 2004 .

[55]  Carol M. Werner,et al.  Motivations and behaviors that support recycling , 1998 .

[56]  Jay Zarnikau,et al.  Consumer demand for ‘green power’ and energy efficiency , 2003 .

[57]  Robin R. Jenkins,et al.  The Determinants of Household Recycling: A Material Specific Analysis of Recycling Program Features and Unit Pricing , 2003 .