Decentralized thermal modeling of multi-zone buildings for control applications and investigation of submodeling error propagation

Abstract Centralized model predictive control is a popular and optimal approach for thermal control of multi-zone buildings. In centralized control of large-scale, multi-zone buildings, decentralized thermal modeling (including identification) may be useful since it may hard and computationally demanding to obtain a single model for the overall system. Success of a centralized predictive controller depends highly on the prediction accuracy of the used control model during control design phase. In decentralized modeling, control-oriented thermal models of individual zones are obtained by taking the thermal interactions with adjacent zones as extra input signals. These submodels can be very accurate when validated at the zone level. However, when all submodels developed in a decentralized approach are combined to construct a model of the overall building system, modeling errors in submodels may be amplified through thermal interactions and the resulting multi-zone model may not have enough prediction accuracy to be used in a centralized model predictive control algorithm. The opposite is also possible: submodel errors may cancel out, to some degree, each other and hence the multi-zone model may have a better prediction accuracy than submodels. In this paper, first a set of state-of-the-art decentralized control-oriented thermal modeling/identification approaches (composable zones approach, graph theory-based decentralized identification approach, and determination of weakly-interacting zones approach) for multi-zone buildings is presented. Second, multi-zone building thermal models based on the composable zones approach and multi-input single output (MISO) ARMAX (AutoRegressive Moving Average with eXogenous input) model structure for submodels are obtained, and then the problem of submodeling error propagation is investigated through a set of case studies. The case studies are arranged with an increasing number of thermal interactions. For the considered case studies, it was found that the combination of composable zones approach with MISO ARMAX model structure for submodels was an appropriate way to obtain accurate control-oriented prediction models for multi-zone buildings. Moreover, it was observed that the error propagation sometimes can be significant when a multi-zone model was composed from submodels, and that there was no correlation between the number of thermal interactions and the level of submodeling error propagation.

[1]  José Luis Guzmán,et al.  Efficient building energy management using distributed model predictive control , 2014 .

[2]  Lieve Helsen,et al.  Optimal Control Approaches for Analysis of Energy Use Minimization of Hybrid Ground-Coupled Heat Pump Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[3]  V. Verdult,et al.  Filtering and System Identification: A Least Squares Approach , 2007 .

[4]  Clara Verhelst,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A CONTROL-ORIENTED MODEL FOR BOREHOLE DYNAMICS FOR BUILDINGS EQUIPPED WITH GROUND COUPLED HEAT PUMPS , 2013 .

[5]  Andrew G. Alleyne,et al.  Optimal Partitioning for the Decentralized Thermal Control of Buildings , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[6]  P. Astrid,et al.  Reduction of process simulation models : a proper orthogonal decomposition approach , 2004 .

[7]  L. Helsen,et al.  A convex approach to a class of non-convex building HVAC control problems: Illustration by two case studies , 2015 .

[8]  Manfred Morari,et al.  BRCM Matlab Toolbox: Model generation for model predictive building control , 2014, 2014 American Control Conference.

[9]  Lieve Helsen,et al.  Control-Oriented Thermal Modeling of Multizone Buildings: Methods and Issues: Intelligent Control of a Building System , 2016, IEEE Control Systems.

[10]  Prabir Barooah,et al.  Issues in identification of control-oriented thermal models of zones in multi-zone buildings , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[11]  Paul M.J. Van den Hof,et al.  Determining Identifiable Parameterizations for Large-scale Physical Models in Reservoir Engineering , 2008 .

[12]  Burcin Becerik-Gerber,et al.  User-led decentralized thermal comfort driven HVAC operations for improved efficiency in office buildings , 2014 .

[13]  Lukas Ferkl,et al.  Model predictive control of a building heating system: The first experience , 2011 .

[14]  Clarence E. Agbi.  Scalable and Robust Design of Model-Based Control Strategies for Energy-Efficient Buildings , 2014 .

[15]  Andrew G. Alleyne,et al.  Decentralized architectures for thermal control of buildings , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[16]  Sippe G. Douma,et al.  Identifiability: from qualitative analysis to model structure approximation , 2009 .

[17]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review , 2010 .

[18]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[19]  Bing Dong,et al.  A real-time model predictive control for building heating and cooling systems based on the occupancy behavior pattern detection and local weather forecasting , 2013, Building Simulation.

[20]  Francesco Borrelli,et al.  Implementation of model predictive control for an HVAC system in a mid-size commercial building , 2014 .

[21]  Andrew G. Alleyne,et al.  Decentralized predictive thermal control for buildings , 2014 .

[22]  Francesco Borrelli,et al.  A distributed predictive control approach to building temperature regulation , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference.

[23]  Petru-Daniel Morosan,et al.  Distributed model predictive control based on Benders' decomposition applied to multisource multizone building temperature regulation , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).