Making nursing visible? Gender, technology and the care plan as script

The objective of this paper is to persuade the reader of the potential benefits to be gained in applying to the study of information systems in Organisations concepts and theoretical tools developed elsewhere in the social sciences. A framework for analysis derived from a combination of feminist theory and social studies of technology (SST) is presented. The key analytical tools of the script and inscription, interpretative flexibility and actant, stabilisation and visibility are discussed. The paper attempts to demonstrate how these tools can be employed to go beyond the stereotypical images of gender and technology, by focusing on contradiction and resistance. An empirical study concerns an automated care planning system used and resisted by nurse users in a UK National Health Service hospital. The discussion is informed by a resultant table describing the outcome of the application of SST tools as well as points made concerning the issue of gender and technology.

[1]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[2]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[3]  Karen A. Frenkel,et al.  Women and computing , 1990, CACM.

[4]  Yvonne Due Billing,et al.  Understanding Gender and Organizations , 1998 .

[5]  C. Cockburn,et al.  Gender and technology in the making , 1993 .

[6]  Lesley Mackay,et al.  Nursing and doctoring: where’s the difference? , 1992 .

[7]  M. Callon.  The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle , 1986 .

[8]  M. Macdonald.  Representing Women: Myths of Femininity in the Popular Media , 1995 .

[9]  G. Bowker,et al.  The multiple bodies of the medical record : Toward a sociology of an artifact , 1996 .

[10]  R. Westrum.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[11]  Peter N. Stearns,et al.  Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change , 1983 .

[12]  John Grundy,et al.  Women and computers , 2008 .

[13]  Joanne Holloway,et al.  The media representation of the nurse: the implications for nursing , 1992 .

[14]  Sheila Peace,et al.  Care matters: Concepts, practice and research in health and social care , 1998 .

[15]  Joan Smith,et al.  Different for Girls: How Culture Creates Women , 1997 .

[16]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Developing Information Infrastructure: The Tension Between Standardization and Flexibility , 1996 .

[17]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards , 1997 .

[18]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Machines and manoeuvres: Responsibility accounting and the construction of hospital information systems , 1992 .

[19]  Sylvia Walby,et al.  Gender segregation at work , 1991 .

[20]  J. Wajcman.  Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies: , 2000 .

[21]  Brian P. Bloomfield.  Understanding the social practices of systems developers , 1992, Inf. Syst. J..

[22]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[23]  J. Salvage,et al.  The Politics of Nursing , 1985 .

[24]  S. Corby,et al.  Opportunity 2000 in the National Health Service: a missed opportunity for women. , 1997, Journal of management in medicine.

[25]  Keith Soothill,et al.  Nursing wastage from the nurses’ perspective , 1992 .

[26]  M. Lohan.  Constructive Tensions in Feminist Technology Studies , 2000 .

[27]  Paul Kind,et al.  Information Management in Health Services. by Justin Keen. Open University Press, Buckingham. No. of pages: 207. ISBN: 0‐335‐19116‐9 , 1994 .

[28]  Kath M. Melia,et al.  Learning and Working: The Occupational Socialization of Nurses , 1987 .

[29]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Management Consultants: Systems Development, Power and the Translation of Problems , 1992 .

[30]  G. Walsham.  Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 1997 .

[31]  W. Faulkner.  Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering , 2000 .

[32]  Bente Rasmussen,et al.  Excluding women from the technologies of the future , 1991 .

[33]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Gender differences and computing: Students' assessment of societal influences , 1985 .

[34]  B. Latour.  Science in Action , 1987 .

[35]  S. Woolgar.  Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials , 1990 .

[36]  Carol Thomas,et al.  De-Constructing Concepts of Care , 1993 .

[37]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  The Role of Information Systems in the UK National Health Service: Action at a Distance and the Fetish of Calculation , 1991 .

[38]  M. Callon.  Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[39]  Shirley Dex,et al.  The Sexual Division of Work: Conceptual Revolutions in the Social Sciences , 1985 .

[40]  Nikala Lane.  The Management Implications of Women’s Employment Disadvantage in a Female‐Dominated Profession: A Study of NHS Nursing , 2000 .

[41]  S. Lukes.  Power: A Radical View , 1974 .

[42]  T. P. Hughes.  Networks of power : electrification in Western society, 1880-1930 , 1984 .

[43]  Jan Stage,et al.  The Role of Gender in User-resistance and IS Failure , 2000 .

[44]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[45]  M. Alvesson.  Doing critical management research , 2000 .

[46]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Women in computing: where are we now? , 1995, CACM.

[47]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Sociotechnical networks and information management in health care , 1999 .

[48]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Absent Friends? The Gender Dimension in Information Systems Research , 2001, Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development.

[49]  Celia Davies,et al.  Gender And The Professional Predicament in Nursing , 1995 .

[50]  Marc Berg,et al.  Orders and Their Others: On the Constitution of Universalities in Medical Work , 2000 .