Quantum Physics and Consciousness: The Quest for a Common Conceptual Foundation

Similar problems keep reappearing in both the discussion about the “hard” problem of consciousness and in fundamental issues in quantum theory. We argue that the similarities are due to common problems within the conceptual foundations of both fields. In quantum physics, the state reduction marks the “coming into being” of a new aspect of reality for which no causal explanation is available. Likewise, the self-referential nature of consciousness constitutes a “coming into being” of a new quality which goes beyond a fully causal account of reality. Both subjects require a categorical scheme which is significantly richer then the one used in addressing factual aspects of reality alone. While parts of this categorical scheme are realized in the formalism of quantum theory, they are seldom applied in the context of consciousness. We show what the structural limitations of a classical categorical framework are, how a richer framework can be developed, and how it can be applied to both quantum physics and consciousness. Concepts that have proven useful in ordering things easily achieve such authority over us that we forget their earthly origins and accept them as unalterable givens. Thus they come to be stamped as “necessities of thought”, “a priori givens”, etc. The path of scientific progress is often made impassable for a long time by such errors. Therefore it is by no means an idle game if we become practiced in analyzing long-held commonplace concepts and showing the circumstances on which their justification and usefulness depend, and how they have grown up, individually, out of the givens of experience. Thus their excessive authority will be broken. They will be removed if they cannot be properly legitimated, corrected if their correlation with given things be far too superfluous, or replaced if a new system can be established that we prefer for whatever reason. Albert Einstein (1916) 1Also at the Department of Theory and Data Analysis, Institute for Frontier Areas of Psychology, Freiburg, Germany; and at the Department of Physics, University of Freiburg, Germany. 60 Filk and von Müller

[1]  日本数学会,et al.  Encyclopedic dictionary of mathematics , 1993 .

[2]  H. Everett "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1957 .

[3]  J. Dieudonne,et al.  Encyclopedic Dictionary of Mathematics , 1979 .

[4]  Roger Penrose,et al.  Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: a model for consciousness , 1996 .

[5]  Henry P. Stapp,et al.  Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer , 2011 .

[6]  G. Edelman,et al.  Consciousness : how matter becomes imagination , 2001 .

[7]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[8]  H. Weyl,et al.  Space, Time, Matter , 1952 .

[9]  D. Chalmers Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness , 1995 .

[10]  R. Tumulka A Relativistic Version of the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber Model , 2004, quant-ph/0406094.

[11]  L. Vaidman,et al.  Quantum mechanical interaction-free measurements , 1993, hep-th/9305002.

[12]  A. Amerio,et al.  Physikalische Zeitschrift , 1900 .

[13]  G. Franck,et al.  A Proposed Relation Between Intensity of Presence and Duration of Nowness , 2009 .

[14]  G. Roger,et al.  Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers , 1982 .

[15]  Abner Shimony,et al.  Wave-packet reduction as a medium of communication , 1977 .

[16]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Weak Quantum Theory: Formal Framework and Selected Applications , 2006 .

[17]  B. Libet Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  Cao Tianyu A New Exploration in Mesoscopic Brain Dynamics , 2005 .

[19]  J. Hartle The physics of now , 2004, gr-qc/0403001.

[20]  John Archibald Wheeler,et al.  The “Past” and the “Delayed-Choice” Double-Slit Experiment , 1978 .

[21]  H. Atmanspacher,et al.  Weak Quantum Theory: Complementarity and Entanglement in Physics and Beyond , 2001 .

[22]  D. Bierman Does Consciousness Collapse the Wave Packet , 2003 .

[23]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Quantum Zeno features of bistable perception , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  J. Oppenheim,et al.  Measurement of time of arrival in quantum mechanics , 1997, quant-ph/9709031.

[25]  J. Oppenheim,et al.  Temporal Ordering in Quantum Mechanics , 2000, quant-ph/0003130.

[26]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Recasting reality : Wolfgang Pauli's philosophical ideas and contemporary science , 2010 .

[27]  J. Wheeler,et al.  Quantum theory and measurement , 1983 .

[28]  Virendra Singh,et al.  Quantum Mechanics and Reality , 2004, quant-ph/0412148.

[29]  D. Hofstadter,et al.  Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid , 1979 .

[30]  J. Neumann Mathematische grundlagen der Quantenmechanik , 1935 .

[31]  Roger Penrose,et al.  Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: A model for consciousness , 1996 .

[32]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Complementarity in Bistable Perception , 2009 .

[33]  R. Feynman The Character of Physical Law , 1965 .

[34]  W. G. Unruh,et al.  WHEN DOES A MEASUREMENT OR EVENT OCCUR? , 1998 .