Development and Analytical Validation of a One-Step Five-Plex RT-ddPCR Assay for the Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Transcripts in Clinical Samples

Highly sensitive methodologies for SARS-CoV-2 detection are essential for the control of COVID-19 pandemic. We developed and analytically validated a highly sensitive and specific five-plex one-step RT-ddPCR assay for SARS-CoV-2. We first designed in-silico novel primers and probes for the simultaneous absolute quantification of three different regions of the nucleoprotein (N) gene of SARS-CoV-2 (N1, N2, N3), a synthetic RNA as an external control (RNA-EC), and Beta-2-Microglobulin (B2M) as an endogenous RNA internal control (RNA-IC). The developed assay was analytically validated using synthetic DNA and RNA calibrator standards and then was applied to 100 clinical specimens previously analyzed with a commercially available CE-IVD RT-qPCR assay. The analytical validation of the developed assay resulted in very good performance characteristics in terms of analytical sensitivity, linearity, analytical specificity, and reproducibility and recovery rates even at very low viral concentrations. The simultaneous absolute quantification of the RNA-EC and RNA-IC provides the necessary metrics for quality control assessment. Direct comparison of the developed one-step five-plex RT-ddPCR assay with a CE-IVD RT-qPCR kit revealed a very high concordance and a higher sensitivity [concordance: 99/100 (99.0%, Spearman’s correlation coefficient: −0.850, p < 0.001)]. The developed assay is highly sensitive, specific, and reproducible and has a broad linear dynamic range, providing absolute quantification of SARS-COV-2 transcripts. The inclusion of two RNA quality controls, an external and an internal, is highly important for standardization of SARS-COV-2 molecular testing in clinical and wastewater samples.

[1]  Lianhua Dong,et al.  Validation of the analytical performance of nine commercial RT-qPCR kits for SARS-CoV-2 detection using certified reference material , 2021, Journal of Virological Methods.

[2]  Nikiforos A Alygizakis,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance data can predict hospitalizations and ICU admissions , 2021, Science of The Total Environment.

[3]  Seungok Lee,et al.  Analytical and Clinical Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in the Detection and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 , 2021, Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy.

[4]  J. Wong,et al.  Novel RT-ddPCR assays for measuring the levels of subgenomic and genomic SARS-CoV-2 transcripts , 2021, Methods.

[5]  J. Malter,et al.  Digital Droplet PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Resolves Borderline Cases , 2021, American journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  M. Akgoz,et al.  The production and characterization of SARS-CoV-2 RNA reference material , 2021, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[7]  D. Andreini,et al.  Digital PCR for high sensitivity viral detection in false-negative SARS-CoV-2 patients , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[8]  H. Gendelman,et al.  Diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 infections , 2021, Nature Materials.

[9]  A. Abate,et al.  Digital droplet PCR accurately quantifies SARS-CoV-2 viral load from crude lysate without nucleic acid purification , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[10]  A. Psyrri,et al.  Development and Analytical Validation of a Reverse Transcription Droplet Digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) Assay for PD-L1 Transcripts in Circulating Tumor Cells. , 2021, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  F. Wang,et al.  Applications of digital PCR in COVID‐19 pandemic , 2021, View.

[12]  C. Houdayer,et al.  Assessment of multiplex digital droplet RT-PCR as a diagnostic tool for SARS-CoV-2 detection in nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples , 2020, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  Zigui Chen,et al.  Genomic and evolutionary comparison between SARS-CoV-2 and other human coronaviruses , 2020, Journal of Virological Methods.

[14]  Linda T. Nieman,et al.  Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of host response to SARS-CoV-2 pulmonary infection , 2020, Nature Communications.

[15]  M. Zapor Persistent Detection and Infectious Potential of SARS-CoV-2 Virus in Clinical Specimens from COVID-19 Patients , 2020, Viruses.

[16]  W. Heywood,et al.  'The long tail of Covid-19' - The detection of a prolonged inflammatory response after a SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic and mildly affected patients. , 2020, F1000Research.

[17]  D. Gill,et al.  Testing for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, BMJ.

[18]  F. Bahreini,et al.  Reducing False Negative PCR Test for COVID-19 , 2020, International journal of MCH and AIDS.

[19]  B. Deiman,et al.  Sensitive detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 by multiplex droplet digital RT-PCR , 2020, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.

[20]  R. Fumagalli,et al.  Detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 by droplet digital PCR in real-time PCR negative nasopharyngeal swabs from suspected COVID-19 patients , 2020, PloS one.

[21]  E. Pomari,et al.  Assessment of the direct quantitation of SARS-CoV-2 by droplet digital PCR , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Jim F Huggett,et al.  The Digital MIQE Guidelines Update: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments for 2020. , 2020, Clinical chemistry.

[23]  Sonia N. Rao,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Clinical Utility of Cycle Threshold Values in the Context of COVID-19 , 2020, Infectious Diseases and Therapy.

[24]  J. Montaner,et al.  Suboptimal Biological Sampling as a Probable Cause of False-Negative COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Results , 2020, medRxiv.

[25]  Malik Peiris,et al.  Molecular Diagnosis of a Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Causing an Outbreak of Pneumonia , 2020, Clinical chemistry.

[26]  Qiuhan Zhang,et al.  Analytical comparisons of SARS-COV-2 detection by qRT-PCR and ddPCR with multiple primer/probe sets , 2020, Emerging microbes & infections.

[27]  Fang Liu,et al.  ddPCR: a more accurate tool for SARS-CoV-2 detection in low viral load specimens , 2020, Emerging microbes & infections.

[28]  Lianhua Dong,et al.  Evaluation of droplet digital PCR and next generation sequencing for characterizing DNA reference material for KRAS mutation detection , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[29]  H. Germain,et al.  Droplet Digital PCR versus qPCR for gene expression analysis with low abundant targets: from variable nonsense to publication quality data , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[30]  Hendrik Emons,et al.  Validation of a digital PCR method for quantification of DNA copy number concentrations by using a certified reference material , 2016, Biomolecular detection and quantification.

[31]  Alexandra S. Whale,et al.  Fundamentals of multiplexing with digital PCR , 2016, Biomolecular detection and quantification.

[32]  B. Fielding,et al.  The Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Is a Multifunctional Protein , 2014, Viruses.

[33]  C. Foy,et al.  Applicability of RNA standards for evaluating RT-qPCR assays and platforms , 2011, BMC Genomics.

[34]  J. Castle,et al.  Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs , 2005, Nature.