Comparing expression level‐dependent features in codon usage with protein abundance: An analysis of ‘predictive proteomics’

Synonymous codon usage is a commonly used means for estimating gene expression levels of Escherichia coli genes and has also been used for predicting highly expressed genes for a number of prokaryotic genomes. By comparison of expression level‐dependent features in codon usage with protein abundance data from two proteome studies of exponentially growing E. coli and Bacillus subtilis cells, we try to evaluate whether the implicit assumption of this approach can be confirmed with experimental data. Log‐odds ratio scores are used to model differences in codon usage between highly expressed genes and genomic average. Using these, the strength and significance of expression level‐dependent features in codon usage were determined for the genes of the Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and Haemophilus influenzae genomes. The comparison of codon usage features with protein abundance data confirmed a relationship between these to be present, although exceptions to this, possibly related to functional context, were found. For species with expression level‐dependent features in their codon usage, the applied methodology could be used to improve in silico simulations of the outcome of two‐dimensional gel electrophoretic experiments.

[1]  O. Berg,et al.  Codon bias in Escherichia coli: the influence of codon context on mutation and selection. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  M. Bulmer,et al.  Reduced synonymous substitution rate at the start of enterobacterial genes. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  R. Brem.  Finding transcription factor binding sequences , 2001, Genome Biology.

[4]  R. Giegerich,et al.  GenDB--an open source genome annotation system for prokaryote genomes. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  A Martinez,et al.  Cloning of the two pyruvate kinase isoenzyme structural genes from Escherichia coli: the relative roles of these enzymes in pyruvate biosynthesis , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[6]  C. Kurland,et al.  Co-variation of tRNA abundance and codon usage in Escherichia coli at different growth rates. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  M. Bulmer.  The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. , 1991, Genetics.

[8]  T. Ikemura.  Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  M. Tomita,et al.  Correlation Between Shine–Dalgarno Sequence Conservation and Codon Usage of Bacterial Genes , 2001, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[10]  J. Bernhardt,et al.  A comprehensive two‐dimensional map of cytosolic proteins of Bacillus subtilis , 2001, Electrophoresis.

[11]  P. Sharp,et al.  Synonymous codon usage in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01. , 2002, Gene.

[12]  S. Kanaya,et al.  Studies of codon usage and tRNA genes of 18 unicellular organisms and quantification of Bacillus subtilis tRNAs: gene expression level and species-specific diversity of codon usage based on multivariate analysis. , 1999, Gene.

[13]  N. W. Davis,et al.  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. , 1997, Science.

[14]  S Karlin,et al.  Codon usages in different gene classes of the Escherichia coli genome , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[15]  M. Inouye,et al.  Escherichia coli CspA-family RNA chaperones are transcription antiterminators. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  M Yarus,et al.  Sense codons are found in specific contexts. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms , 1986, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[18]  K. H. Wolfe,et al.  Base Composition Skews, Replication Orientation, and Gene Orientation in 12 Prokaryote Genomes , 1998, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[19]  T. Ikemura.  Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  R. Fleischmann,et al.  Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. , 1995, Science.

[21]  P. Sharp,et al.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  C. Hoogland,et al.  '98 Escherichia coli SWISS‐2DPAGE database update , 1998, Electrophoresis.

[23]  M. Bulmer.  Codon usage and intragenic position. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  T. Ikemura.  Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. , 1985, Molecular biology and evolution.

[25]  Peter D. Karp,et al.  The EcoCyc Database , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  A Danchin,et al.  Codon usage and lateral gene transfer in Bacillus subtilis. , 1999, Current opinion in microbiology.

[27]  Djamel Medjahed,et al.  VIRTUAL2D: A web‐accessible predictive database for proteomics analysis , 2003, Proteomics.

[28]  S. Hooper,et al.  Gradients in nucleotide and codon usage along Escherichia coli genes. , 2000, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  A. Eyre-Walker,et al.  Synonymous codon bias is related to gene length in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy? , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[30]  A. Goffeau,et al.  The complete genome sequence of the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis , 1997, Nature.

[31]  M. Inouye,et al.  CspA, the Major Cold-shock Protein of Escherichia coli, Is an RNA Chaperone* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  M. Inouye,et al.  Cold-shock response and cold-shock proteins. , 1999, Current opinion in microbiology.

[33]  D. Lynn,et al.  Synonymous codon usage is subject to selection in thermophilic bacteria. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  M. Inouye,et al.  Selective mRNA Degradation by Polynucleotide Phosphorylase in Cold Shock Adaptation in Escherichia coli , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[35]  W. Fiers,et al.  Preferential codon usage in prokaryotic genes: the optimal codon-anticodon interaction energy and the selective codon usage in efficiently expressed genes. , 1982, Gene.

[36]  C. Dutta,et al.  Codon usage in highly expressed genes of Haemophillus influenzae and Mycobacterium tuberculosis: translational selection versus mutational bias. , 1998, Gene.

[37]  A. Eyre-Walker.  The close proximity ofEscherichia coli genes: Consequences for stop codon and synonymous codon use , 1996, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[38]  A. Danchin,et al.  Evidence for horizontal gene transfer in Escherichia coli speciation. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Manolo Gouy,et al.  Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity , 1981, Nucleic Acids Res..

[40]  S. Karlin,et al.  Predicted Highly Expressed Genes of Diverse Prokaryotic Genomes , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[41]  W. Hendrickson,et al.  Protein folding and unfolding by Escherichia coli chaperones and chaperonins. , 2000, Current opinion in microbiology.

[42]  M. Gouy.  Codon contexts in enterobacterial and coliphage genes. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[43]  G. McVean,et al.  Evolutionary Lability of Context-Dependent Codon Bias in Bacteria , 2000, Journal of Molecular Evolution.