Post-stimulation block of frog sciatic nerve by high-frequency (kHz) biphasic stimulation

This study determined if high-frequency biphasic stimulation can induce nerve conduction block that persists after the stimulation is terminated, i.e., post-stimulation block. The frog sciatic nerve-muscle preparation was used in the study. Muscle contraction force induced by low-frequency (0.5 Hz) nerve stimulation was recorded to indicate the occurrence and recovery of nerve block induced by the high-frequency (5 or 10 kHz) biphasic stimulation. Nerve block was observed during high-frequency stimulation and after termination of the stimulation. The recovery from post-stimulation block occurred in two distinct phases. During the first phase, the complete block induced during high-frequency stimulation was maintained. The average maximal duration for the first phase was 107 ± 50 s. During the second phase, the block gradually or abruptly reversed. The duration of both first and second phases was dependent on stimulation intensity and duration but not frequency. Stimulation of higher intensity (1.4–2 times block threshold) and longer duration (5 min) produced the longest period (249 ± 58 s) for a complete recovery. Post-stimulation block can be induced by high-frequency biphasic stimulation, which is important for future investigations of the blocking mechanisms and for optimizing the stimulation parameters or protocols in clinical applications.

[1]  K. Kilgore,et al.  Reversible Nerve Conduction Block Using Kilohertz Frequency Alternating Current , 2014, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[2]  C. Baird,et al.  The pilot study. , 2000, Orthopedic nursing.

[3]  R. Butera,et al.  Unmyelinated Aplysia Nerves Exhibit a Nonmonotonic Blocking Response to High-Frequency Stimulation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1990 .

[5]  A. Rosenblueth,et al.  THE ACTION OF ALTERNATING CURRENTS UPON THE ELECTRICAL EXCITABILITY OF NERVE , 1939 .

[6]  Konstantinos Alataris,et al.  Effect of High‐Frequency Alternating Current on Spinal Afferent Nociceptive Transmission , 2013, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[7]  Tianshuang Qiu,et al.  Post stimulus effects of high frequency biphasic electrical current on a fibre's conductibility in isolated frog nerves , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  Xu Zhang,et al.  Mechanism of Nerve Conduction Block Induced by High-Frequency Biphasic Electrical Currents , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  A. Huxley,et al.  The action potential in the myelinated nerve fibre of Xenopus laevis as computed on the basis of voltage clamp data , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  F. Rattay,et al.  Modeling axon membranes for functional electrical stimulation , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  F. Rattay Analysis of models for extracellular fiber stimulation , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Niloy Bhadra,et al.  High‐frequency electrical conduction block of mammalian peripheral motor nerve , 2005, Muscle & nerve.

[13]  K. Kilgore,et al.  Nerve conduction block utilising high-frequency alternating current , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[14]  J. A. TANNER,et al.  Reversible Blocking of Nerve Conduction by Alternating-Current Excitation , 1962, Nature.

[15]  Changfeng Tai,et al.  Simulation analysis of conduction block in unmyelinated axons induced by high-frequency biphasic electrical currents , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  A. Benabid,et al.  Long-term suppression of tremor by chronic stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus , 1991, The Lancet.

[17]  A. Rosenblueth,et al.  THE BLOCKING AND DEBLOCKING EFFECTS OF ALTERNATING CURRENTS ON NERVE , 1939 .

[18]  C. N. Honda,et al.  Effects of high-frequency alternating current on axonal conduction through the vagus nerve , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  Warren M. Grill,et al.  Kilohertz Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation Is Ineffective at Regularizing the Firing of Model Thalamic Neurons , 2016, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[20]  Z. Fang,et al.  High‐Frequency Electrical Nerve Block for Postamputation Pain: A Pilot Study , 2015, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[21]  R. Butera,et al.  High-Frequency Stimulation Selectively Blocks Different Types of Fibers in Frog Sciatic Nerve , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  Arthur Prochazka,et al.  Transcutaneously Coupled, High-Frequency Electrical Stimulation of the Pudendal Nerve Blocks External Urethral Sphincter Contractions , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[23]  D. Mcneal,et al.  Response of single alpha motoneurons to high-frequency pulse trains. Firing behavior and conduction block phenomenon. , 1986, Applied neurophysiology.

[24]  Ninh T. Nguyen,et al.  The EMPOWER Study: Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial of Vagal Blockade to Induce Weight Loss in Morbid Obesity , 2012, Obesity Surgery.

[25]  Changfeng Tai,et al.  Block of external urethral sphincter contraction by high frequency electrical stimulation of pudendal nerve. , 2004, The Journal of urology.