“Hidden” Seyfert 2 Galaxies and the X-Ray Background

Obscured active galactic nuclei, which are classified optically as type 2 (narrow line) Seyfert galaxies in the local universe, are by far the most promising candidates for the origin of the hard (2-10 keV) X-ray background radiation. However, optical follow-up observations of faint X-ray sources in deep Chandra images have revealed surprising numbers of apparently normal galaxies at modest redshift. Such objects represent ~40%-60% of the sources classified in deep Chandra surveys, raising the possibility that the X-ray galaxy population has evolved with cosmic time. Alternatively, most of the faint X-ray galaxies in question are so distant that their angular diameters are comparable to the slit widths used in ground-based spectroscopic observations; thus, their nuclear spectral features may be overwhelmed ("hidden") by host galaxy light. To test this hypothesis, we have obtained integrated spectra of a sample of nearby, well-studied Seyfert 2 galaxies. The data, which accurately simulate observations of distant Chandra sources, demonstrate convincingly that the defining spectral signatures of Seyfert 2s can be hidden by light from their host galaxies. In fact, 60% of the observed objects would not be classified as Seyfert 2s on the basis of their integrated spectra, similar to the fraction of faint X-ray sources identified with "normal" galaxies. Thus, the numbers of narrow-line active galaxies in deep Chandra surveys (and perhaps all ground-based spectroscopic surveys of distant galaxies) are likely to have been underestimated.

[1]  M. Mignoli,et al.  The HELLAS2XMM Survey. II. Multiwavelength Observations of P3: An X-Ray-bright, Optically Inactive Galaxy , 2002, astro-ph/0202080.

[2]  Marc Davis,et al.  A Composite Seyfert 2 X-Ray Spectrum: Implications for the Origin of the Cosmic X-Ray Background , 2001, astro-ph/0106519.

[3]  W. Brandt,et al.  Supermassive Black Hole Accretion History Inferred from a Large Sample of Chandra Hard X-Ray Sources , 2001, astro-ph/0106219.

[4]  S. Borgani,et al.  New Results from the X-Ray and Optical Survey of the Chandra Deep Field-South: The 300 Kilosecond Exposure. II. , 2001, astro-ph/0103014.

[5]  E. Feigelson,et al.  The Chandra Deep Survey of the Hubble Deep Field-North Area. II. Results from the Caltech Faint Field Galaxy Redshift Survey Area , 2001 .

[6]  G. Hasinger,et al.  Testing current synthesis models of the X-ray background , 2000, astro-ph/0011341.

[7]  A. Barth,et al.  The Frequency of Polarized Broad Emission Lines in Type 2 Seyfert Galaxies , 2000, astro-ph/0007357.

[8]  R. Mushotzky,et al.  The Nature of the Hard X-Ray Background Sources: Optical, Near-Infrared, Submillimeter, and Radio Properties , 2000, astro-ph/0007175.

[9]  R. Mushotzky,et al.  Resolving the extragalactic hard X-ray background , 2000, Nature.

[10]  D. Helfand,et al.  Classification of IRAS-selected X-Ray Galaxies in the ROSAT All-Sky Survey , 1996 .

[11]  A. C. Fabian,et al.  The unified Seyfert scheme and the origin of the cosmic X-ray background , 1994 .

[12]  Robert C. Kennicutt,et al.  The Integrated spectra of nearby galaxies: General properties and emission line spectra , 1992 .

[13]  R. Kennicutt A spectrophotometric atlas of galaxies , 1992 .

[14]  J. Ulvestad,et al.  Radio structures of Seyfert galaxies. VII. Extension of a distance-limited sample , 1989 .

[15]  R. Tully Nearby Galaxies Catalog , 1988 .

[16]  S. Veilleux,et al.  Spectral Classification of Emission-Line Galaxies , 1986 .

[17]  A. V. Filippenko,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF ATMOSPHERIC DIFFERENTIAL REFRACTION IN SPECTROPHOTOMETRY. , 1982 .