APOBEC-related mutagenesis and neo-peptide hydrophobicity: implications for response to immunotherapy

ABSTRACT Tumor-associated neo-antigens are mutated peptides that allow the immune system to recognize the affected cell as foreign. Cells carrying excessive mutation load often develop mechanisms of tolerance. PD-L1/PD-1 checkpoint immunotherapy is a highly promising approach to overcome these protective signals and induce tumor shrinkage. Yet, the nature of the neo-antigens driving those beneficial responses remains unclear. Here, we show that APOBEC-related mutagenesis – a mechanism at the crossroads between anti-viral immunity and endogenous nucleic acid editing – increases neo-peptide hydrophobicity (a feature of immunogenicity), as demonstrated by in silico computation and in the TCGA pan-cancer cohort, where APOBEC-related mutagenesis was also strongly associated with immune marker expression. Moreover, APOBEC-related mutagenesis correlated with immunotherapy response in a cohort of 99 patients with diverse cancers, and this correlation was independent of the tumor mutation burden (TMB). Combining APOBEC-related mutagenesis estimate and TMB resulted in greater predictive ability than either parameter alone. Based on these results, further investigation of APOBEC-related mutagenesis as a marker of response to anti-cancer checkpoint blockade is warranted.

[1]  M. Jia,et al.  APOBEC3B and APOBEC mutational signature as potential predictive markers for immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer , 2018, Oncogene.

[2]  S. Ramalingam,et al.  Tumor Mutation Burden: Leading Immunotherapy to the Era of Precision Medicine? , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  T. Ideker,et al.  MHC-I Genotype Restricts the Oncogenic Mutational Landscape , 2017, Cell.

[4]  A. Levine,et al.  A neoantigen fitness model predicts tumour response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy , 2017, Nature.

[5]  P. Stephens,et al.  Tumor Mutational Burden as an Independent Predictor of Response to Immunotherapy in Diverse Cancers , 2017, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[6]  L. Ni,et al.  New B7 Family Checkpoints in Human Cancers , 2017, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[7]  Ioana R. Bonta,et al.  Correlation between tumor mutation burden and response to immunotherapy. , 2017 .

[8]  Levi Garraway,et al.  Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden , 2017, Genome Medicine.

[9]  A. Goodman,et al.  PD-1–PD-L1 immune-checkpoint blockade in B-cell lymphomas , 2017, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[10]  R. Kurzrock,et al.  Next generation predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition , 2016, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[11]  I. Tsigelny,et al.  High expression of PD-1 ligands is associated with kataegis mutational signature and APOBEC3 alterations , 2017, Oncoimmunology.

[12]  J. Lunceford,et al.  Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression and Response to the Anti-Programmed Death 1 Antibody Pembrolizumab in Melanoma. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  N. Jamieson,et al.  Gene expression profiling to predict responsiveness to immunotherapy , 2016, Cancer Gene Therapy.

[14]  G. Linette,et al.  Avelumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicentre, single-group, open-label, phase 2 trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[15]  E. Birney,et al.  Breast cancer genome and transcriptome integration implicates specific mutational signatures with immune cell infiltration , 2016, Nature Communications.

[16]  Yu Shyr,et al.  Targeted Next Generation Sequencing Identifies Markers of Response to PD-1 Blockade , 2016, Cancer Immunology Research.

[17]  P. Cagle,et al.  PD-1/PD-L1, Only a Piece of the Puzzle. , 2016, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[18]  S. Ganesan,et al.  Biomarkers for Immunotherapy: Current Developments and Challenges. , 2016, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[19]  R. Bourgon,et al.  Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[20]  Lauren L. Ritterhouse,et al.  Association of Polymerase e-Mutated and Microsatellite-Instable Endometrial Cancers With Neoantigen Load, Number of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Expression of PD-1 and PD-L1. , 2015, JAMA oncology.

[21]  L. Crinò,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  J. Larkin,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Bert Vogelstein,et al.  PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Michael Huemer,et al.  AID/APOBEC deaminases and cancer , 2015, Oncoscience.

[25]  Sri Krishna,et al.  TCR contact residue hydrophobicity is a hallmark of immunogenic CD8+ T cell epitopes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Razelle Kurzrock,et al.  PD-L1 Expression as a Predictive Biomarker in Cancer Immunotherapy , 2015, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[27]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer Therapy. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  Alex M. Fichtenholtz,et al.  Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[29]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.

[30]  Steven A. Roberts,et al.  An APOBEC cytidine deaminase mutagenesis pattern is widespread in human cancers , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[31]  I. Rogozin,et al.  AID/APOBEC cytosine deaminase induces genome-wide kataegis , 2012, Biology Direct.

[32]  C. Drake,et al.  Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  Mutational Processes Molding the Genomes of 21 Breast Cancers , 2012, Cell.

[34]  L. Eisenlohr,et al.  Hydrophobicity as a driver of MHC class I antigen processing , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[35]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Integrative analysis reveals selective 9p24.1 amplification, increased PD-1 ligand expression, and further induction via JAK2 in nodular sclerosing Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma. , 2010, Blood.

[36]  Ronald N. Germain,et al.  MHC-dependent antigen processing and peptide presentation: Providing ligands for T lymphocyte activation , 1994, Cell.

[37]  R. Doolittle,et al.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  J. Wolchok,et al.  First Tissue-Agnostic Drug Approval Issued. , 2017, Cancer discovery.

[39]  J. Norris Appendix: probability and measure , 1997 .

[40]  Laurence Zitvogel,et al.  Antigen presentation and T cell stimulation by dendritic cells. , 2002, Annual review of immunology.

[41]  Toshimichi Ikemura,et al.  Codon usage tabulated from international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000 , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..