A combined experimental and modelling approach to aortic valve viscoelasticity in tensile deformation

The quasi-static mechanical behaviour of the aortic valve (AV) is highly non-linear and anisotropic in nature and reflects the complex collagen fibre kinematics in response to applied loading. However, little is known about the viscoelastic behaviour of the AV. The aim of this study was to investigate porcine AV tissue under uniaxial tensile deformation, in order to establish the directional dependence of its viscoelastic behaviour. Rate dependency associated with different mechanical properties was investigated, and a new viscoelastic model incorporating rate effects developed, based on the Kelvin-Voigt model. Even at low applied loads, experimental results showed rate dependency in the stress–strain response, and also hysteresis and dissipation effects. Furthermore, corresponding values of each parameter depended on the loading direction. The model successfully predicted the experimental data and indicated a ‘shear-thinning’ behaviour. By extrapolating the experimental data to that at physiological strain rates, the model predicts viscous damping coefficients of 8.3 MPa s and 3.9 MPa s, in circumferential and radial directions, respectively. This implies that the native AV offers minimal resistance to internal shear forces induced by blood flow, a potentially critical design feature for substitute implants. These data suggest that the mechanical behaviour of the AV cannot be thoroughly characterised by elastic deformation and fibre recruitment assumptions alone.

[1]  F J Schoen,et al.  Founder's Award, 25th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, perspectives. Providence, RI, April 28-May 2, 1999. Tissue heart valves: current challenges and future research perspectives. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  Y. Missirlis,et al.  Aortic valve mechanics. Part II: a stress analysis of the porcine aortic valve leaflets in diastole. , 1978, Biomaterials, medical devices, and artificial organs.

[3]  Magdi H Yacoub,et al.  Novel approaches to cardiac valve repair: from structure to function: Part I. , 2004, Circulation.

[4]  V. Hasırcı,et al.  Biomaterials , 2004, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

[5]  Guido Van Nooten,et al.  Heart valve tissue engineering. , 2006, Acta cardiologica.

[6]  D. Mavrilas,et al.  An approach to the optimization of preparation of bioprosthetic heart valves. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  D. Bader,et al.  An investigation into the effects of the hierarchical structure of tendon fascicles on micromechanical properties , 2004, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  D R Boughner,et al.  Internal shear properties of fresh porcine aortic valve cusps: implications for normal valve function. , 1996, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[9]  X. Luo,et al.  A nonlinear anisotropic model for porcine aortic heart valves. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Michael S Sacks,et al.  On the biaxial mechanical properties of the layers of the aortic valve leaflet. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  J.M.A. Lenihan,et al.  Biomechanics — Mechanical properties of living tissue , 1982 .

[12]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[13]  Lin Yang,et al.  The relation between collagen fibril kinematics and mechanical properties in the mitral valve anterior leaflet. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  Gwm Gerrit Peters,et al.  Fluid-structure interaction in the aortic heart valve , 2001 .

[15]  A. Pandit,et al.  Microarchitectural characterization of the aortic heart valve. , 2004, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[16]  Corina Stefania Drapaca,et al.  A Quasi-linear Viscoelastic Constitutive Equation for the Brain: Application to Hydrocephalus , 2006 .

[17]  Dalin Tang,et al.  An experimental study on the ultimate strength of the adventitia and media of human atherosclerotic carotid arteries in circumferential and axial directions. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Y. Fung,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , 1981 .

[19]  Boughner Dr,et al.  Internal shear properties of fresh porcine aortic valve cusps: implications for normal valve function. , 1996 .

[20]  F J Schoen,et al.  Pathological considerations in replacement cardiac valves. , 1992, Cardiovascular pathology.

[21]  M. Sacks,et al.  Biaxial mechanical properties of the native and glutaraldehyde-treated aortic valve cusp: Part II--A structural constitutive model. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  David E. Schmidt,et al.  On the biomechanics of heart valve function. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  J. Trefil,et al.  An in vivo study of the dimensional changes of the aortic valve leaflets during the cardiac cycle. , 1977, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  T. Wight,et al.  The extracellular matrix: an active or passive player in fibrosis? , 2011, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[25]  Y. Lanir Constitutive equations for fibrous connective tissues. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Frederick J Schoen,et al.  Calcification of tissue heart valve substitutes: progress toward understanding and prevention. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[27]  D P Pioletti,et al.  Viscoelastic constitutive law in large deformations: application to human knee ligaments and tendons. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  I Vesely,et al.  The role of elastin in aortic valve mechanics. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  G. Christie,et al.  Biaxial mechanical properties of explanted aortic allograft leaflets. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[30]  F. Guilak,et al.  Correlation between heart valve interstitial cell stiffness and transvalvular pressure: implications for collagen biosynthesis. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[31]  A A Sauren,et al.  Elastic and viscoelastic material behaviour of fresh and glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic valve tissue. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  A A Sauren,et al.  The mechanical properties of porcine aortic valve tissues. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  E. Carew,et al.  The Effect of Strain Rate on the Viscoelastic Response of Aortic Valve Tissue: A Direct-Fit Approach , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  M. Sacks,et al.  Time-dependent biaxial mechanical behavior of the aortic heart valve leaflet. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  M. Sacks,et al.  Biaxial mechanical properties of the natural and glutaraldehyde treated aortic valve cusp--Part I: Experimental results. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[36]  W. E. Jamieson,et al.  Modern Cardiac Valve Devices— Bioprostheses and Mechanical Prostheses: State of the Art , 1993, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[37]  T. Korakianitis,et al.  Thermodynamic effects of linear dissipative small deformations , 2010 .

[38]  R. Dalziel,et al.  Articular cartilage. , 1971, Lancet.

[39]  I Vesely,et al.  Porcine pulmonary and aortic valves: a comparison of their tensile viscoelastic properties at physiological strain rates. , 1995, The Journal of heart valve disease.