Accelerating Least Squares Imaging Using Deep Learning Techniques

Wave equation techniques have been an integral part of geophysical imaging workflows to investigate the Earth's subsurface. Least-squares reverse time migration (LSRTM) is a linearized inversion problem that iteratively minimizes a misfit functional as a function of the model perturbation. The success of the inversion largely depends on our ability to handle large systems of equations given the massive computation costs. The size of the system almost exponentially increases with the demand for higher resolution images in complicated subsurface media. We propose an unsupervised deep learning approach that leverages the existing physics-based models and machine learning optimizers to achieve more accurate and cheaper solutions. We compare different optimizers and demonstrate their efficacy in mitigating imaging artifacts. Further, minimizing the Huber loss with mini-batch gradients and Adam optimizer is not only less memory-intensive but is also more robust. We demonstrate high accuracy predictions on complex synthetic scientific models that can generate noisy data.

[1]  Yanghua Wang,et al.  Least-squares RTM with L1 norm regularisation , 2016 .

[2]  T. Kunz,et al.  Three dimensional SEG/EAEG models; an update , 1996 .

[3]  G. McMechan MIGRATION BY EXTRAPOLATION OF TIME‐DEPENDENT BOUNDARY VALUES* , 1983 .

[4]  J. Claerbout Toward a unified theory of reflector mapping , 1971 .

[5]  Yangkang Chen,et al.  Seismic imaging of incomplete data and simultaneous-source data using least-squares reverse time migration with shaping regularization , 2016 .

[6]  W. Symes,et al.  Robust inversion of seismic data using the Huber norm , 2003 .

[7]  Amir Adler,et al.  Deep-learning tomography , 2018 .

[8]  Luca Antiga,et al.  Automatic differentiation in PyTorch , 2017 .

[9]  G. Schuster,et al.  Least-squares migration of incomplete reflection data , 1999 .

[10]  Ekkehart Tessmer Reverse-time migration in TTI media , 2010 .

[11]  Frederick R. Forst,et al.  On robust estimation of the location parameter , 1980 .

[12]  Tapan Mukerji,et al.  Pre-stack inversion using a physics-guided convolutional neural network , 2019, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2019.

[13]  Yaxun Tang Target-oriented wave-equation least-squares migration/inversion with phase-encoded Hessian , 2009 .

[14]  Amir Adler,et al.  Deep Recurrent Architectures for Seismic Tomography , 2019, 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019.

[15]  Gerard T. Schuster,et al.  Least-Squares Cross-Well Migration , 1993 .

[16]  E. Baysal,et al.  Reverse time migration , 1983 .

[17]  Alan Richardson,et al.  Seismic Full-Waveform Inversion Using Deep Learning Tools and Techniques , 2018, 1801.07232.

[18]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Automated fault detection without seismic processing , 2017 .

[19]  T. Hansen,et al.  Efficient Monte Carlo sampling of inverse problems using a neural network-based forward—applied to GPR crosshole traveltime inversion , 2017 .

[20]  A. Guitton Amplitude and kinematic corrections of migrated images for nonunitary imaging operators , 2004 .

[21]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Hopfield neural networks, and mean field annealing for seismic deconvolution and multiple attenuation , 1997 .

[22]  M. Sacchi,et al.  Least‐squares wave‐equation migration for AVP/AVA inversion , 2003 .

[23]  Mark W. Schmidt,et al.  Hybrid Deterministic-Stochastic Methods for Data Fitting , 2011, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[24]  J. Rickett Illumination-based normalization for wave-equation depth migration , 2003 .

[25]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Fast waveform inversion without source‐encoding , 2013 .

[26]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Unsupervised physics-based neural networks for seismic migration , 2019 .

[27]  Jinghuai Gao,et al.  Mini-batch optimized full waveform inversion with geological constrained gradient filtering , 2018 .