A Look at Both Sides of the Coin: Investigating the Protective and the Disclosure Effect of Patenting

This paper presents a theoretical and empirical investigation of the two basic effects of patenting: the positive effect of temporarily mitigating competition, and the negative effect of mandatory disclosure of a patent application. Providing empirical evidence for the presented theoretical results we find that (i) a technological lead and the propensity to patent are negatively related as opposed to common intuition, (ii) in industries with imperfect appropriability in case of secrecy the extent of the technological lead is positively associated with the propensity to patent, and that (iii) the intensity of patent protection mitigates the competitive threat a patentee faces.

[1]  D. Mallick.  Marginal and interaction effects in ordered response models , 2008 .

[2]  Ulrich Lehmann-Grube,et al.  Second-Mover Advantages in Dynamic Quality Competition , 2001 .

[3]  T. V. Dijk,et al.  Patent Height and Competition in Product Improvements , 1996 .

[4]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Recent Research on the Economics of Patents , 2012 .

[5]  D. Austin,et al.  An Event-Study Approach to Measuring Innovative Output: The Case of Biotechnology , 1993 .

[6]  Ignatius J. Horstmann,et al.  Patents as Information Transfer Mechanisms: To Patent or (Maybe) Not to Patent , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[8]  Alexandra K. Zaby.  Losing the lead: the patenting decision in the light of the disclosure requirement , 2010 .

[9]  J. Lerner.  The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[10]  C. Ai,et al.  Interaction terms in logit and probit models , 2003 .

[11]  James J. Anton,et al.  Little patents and big secrets: managing intellectual property , 2004 .

[12]  Vincenzo Denicolò,et al.  How should forward patent protection be provided , 2002 .

[13]  Aldo Rustichini,et al.  Better Late than Early: Vertical Differentiation in the Adoption of a New Technology , 1993 .

[14]  Francisco Polidoro,et al.  Letting Rivals Come Close or Warding Them Off? The Effects of Substitution Threat on Imitation Deterrence , 2011 .

[15]  G. Hoetker.  The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues , 2007 .

[16]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[17]  A. Arundel.  The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation , 2001 .

[18]  K. Hussinger.  IS SILENCE GOLDEN? PATENTS VERSUS SECRECY AT THE FIRM LEVEL , 2006 .

[19]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[20]  Alexandra K. Zaby.  The Decision to Patent , 2010 .

[21]  Alexandra K. Zaby,et al.  The heterogeneous costs of disclosure and the propensity to patent , 2013 .