Fuzzy-based Trust Measurement for CoPs in Knowledge Management Systems

The importance of communities of practice(CoP) as an organizational informal unit for fostering knowledge transfer and sharing gains a lot of attention from KM researchers and practitioners. Since most of CoPs are formulated online these days, the credibility or trustworthiness of knowledge contents circulated within a certain CoP should be considered thoroughly for them to be fully utilized safely. Here comes the need for an appropriate trust measuring methodology to determine the true value of knowledge given by unknown people through an online channel. In this paper, an improved trust measuring method is proposed using new trust variables such as level of degrees derived from the relationships among community users. In addition, activeness, relevance, and usefulness of the knowledge contents themselves, which are calculated automatically using a text categorization technique, are also used for trust measurement. The proposed framework incorporates fuzzy set and calculation concepts to help build trust matrices and models, which are used to measure the level of trust involved in specific knowledge artifacts concerned.

[1]  Michael E. Lesk,et al.  Computer Evaluation of Indexing and Text Processing , 1968, JACM.

[2]  Kamal Kant Bharadwaj,et al.  Fuzzy computational models for trust and reputation systems , 2009, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[3]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[5]  Stephen T. Kent,et al.  Internet Privacy Enhanced Mail , 1993, CACM.

[6]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices , 1998 .

[7]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing , 2003, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Jan Bosch,et al.  Framework integration problems, causes, solutions , 1999, CACM.

[9]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[10]  Sulin Ba,et al.  Establishing Online Trust Through a Community Responsibility System , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  A. Bunde,et al.  Propagation of confidential information on scale-free networks , 2007 .

[12]  Gerard Salton,et al.  On the Specification of Term Values in Automatic Indexing , 1973 .

[13]  Yung-Ming Li,et al.  TREPPS: A Trust-based Recommender System for Peer Production Services , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Jinjoo Lee,et al.  An exploratory contingency model of user participation and MIS use , 1986, Inf. Manag..

[15]  Mathias Klang,et al.  Who do you Trust ? Beyond Encryption , Secure ebusiness , 2000 .

[16]  Christopher M. Johnson,et al.  Communities of Practice , 2001 .

[17]  Ravi S. Sandhu,et al.  Secure Cookies on the Web , 2000, IEEE Internet Comput..

[18]  Joachim Karlsson,et al.  A Cost-Value Approach for Prioritizing Requirements , 1997, IEEE Softw..

[19]  Yung-Ming Li,et al.  A synthetical approach for blog recommendation: Combining trust, social relation, and semantic analysis , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Margaret Tan,et al.  The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Jonathan S. Shapiro,et al.  EROS: A Principle-Driven Operating System from the Ground Up , 2002, IEEE Softw..

[22]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  Barriers to effective use of knowledge management systems in software engineering , 2003, CACM.

[23]  Gabriel Szulanski Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[24]  Young-Kee Kim Confidence Indicators and Evaluation Factors of Credibility According to the Types of Online Information , 2010 .

[25]  Joseph P. Cannon,et al.  An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer–Seller Relationships: , 1997 .