Migrating a complex classification scheme to the semantic web: expressing the Integrative Levels Classification using SKOS RDF

PurposeThe Integrative Levels Classification (ILC) is a comprehensive “freely faceted” knowledge organization system not previously expressed as SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System). This paper reports and reflects on work converting the ILC to SKOS representation.Design/methodology/approachThe design of the ILC representation and the various steps in the conversion to SKOS are described and located within the context of previous work considering the representation of complex classification schemes in SKOS. Various issues and trade-offs emerging from the conversion are discussed. The conversion implementation employed the STELETO transformation tool.FindingsThe ILC conversion captures some of the ILC facet structure by a limited extension beyond the SKOS standard. SPARQL examples illustrate how this extension could be used to create faceted, compound descriptors when indexing or cataloguing. Basic query patterns are provided that might underpin search systems. Possible routes for reducing complexity are discussed.Originality/valueComplex classification schemes, such as the ILC, have features which are not straight forward to represent in SKOS and which extend beyond the functionality of the SKOS standard. The ILC's facet indicators are modelled as rdf:Property sub-hierarchies that accompany the SKOS RDF statements. The ILC's top-level fundamental facet relationships are modelled by extensions of the associative relationship – specialised sub-properties of skos:related. An approach for representing faceted compound descriptions in ILC and other faceted classification schemes is proposed.

[1]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[2]  Douglas Tudhope,et al.  A study of semantic integration across archaeological data and reports in different languages , 2018, J. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Bernhard Haslhofer,et al.  Using SKOS vocabularies for improving web search , 2013, WWW '13 Companion.

[4]  Marcia Lei Zeng,et al.  FAIR + FIT: Guiding Principles and Functional Metrics for Linked Open Data (LOD) KOS Products , 2020 .

[5]  Antoine Isaac,et al.  Linked data practice at different levels of semantic precision: The perspective of libraries, archives and museums , 2015 .

[6]  Claudio Gnoli,et al.  Classifying Phenomena Part 1: Dimensions , 2016 .

[7]  Park Ziyoung,et al.  The Second Edition of the Integrative Levels Classification: Evolution of a KOS , 2020 .

[8]  Harith Alani,et al.  Augmenting Thesaurus Relationships: Possibilities for Retrieval , 2001, J. Digit. Inf..

[9]  Aida Slavic,et al.  Building a faceted classification for the humanities: principles and procedures , 2007, J. Documentation.

[10]  Marcia Lei Zeng,et al.  Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) in the Semantic Web: a multi-dimensional review , 2018, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[11]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  THE DESIGN OF DATABASES AND OTHER INFORMATION RESOURCES FOR HUMANITIES SCHOLARS: THE GETTY ONLINE SEARCHING PROJECT REPORT NO. 4 , 1994 .

[12]  Alistair Miles,et al.  SKOS: Simple Knowledge Organisation for the Web , 2007 .

[13]  Douglas Tudhope,et al.  Faceted Thesauri , 2008 .

[14]  Dan Brickley,et al.  SKOS Core: Simple knowledge organisation for the Web , 2005, Dublin Core Conference.

[15]  María Luisa Alvite Díez,et al.  La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico: Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge : Actas del VIII Congreso ISKO - España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 , 2007 .

[16]  Marcia Lei Zeng,et al.  Modeling Classification Systems in SKOS: Some Challenges and Best-Practice Recommendations , 2009, Dublin Core Conference.

[17]  Joachim Neubert,et al.  The Role of Thesauri in an Open Web: A Case Study of the STW Thesaurus for Economics , 2016 .

[18]  Johannes Keizer,et al.  The AGROVOC Linked Dataset , 2013, Semantic Web.