Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies

PurposeThis review aims to provide insight into the factors that influence quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET images in oncology as well as their influence on repeated measures studies (i.e. treatment response assessment), offering improved understanding both for clinical practice and research.MethodsStructural PubMed searches have been performed for the many factors affecting quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET. Review articles and references lists have been used to supplement the search findings.ResultsBiological factors such as fasting blood glucose level, FDG uptake period, FDG distribution and clearance, patient motion (breathing) and patient discomfort (stress) all influence quantification. Acquisition parameters should be adjusted to maximize the signal to noise ratio without exposing the patient to a higher than strictly necessary radiation dose. This is especially challenging in pharmacokinetic analysis, where the temporal resolution is of significant importance. The literature is reviewed on the influence of attenuation correction on parameters for glucose metabolism, the effect of motion, metal artefacts and contrast agents on quantification of CT attenuation-corrected images. Reconstruction settings (analytical versus iterative reconstruction, post-reconstruction filtering and image matrix size) all potentially influence quantification due to artefacts, noise levels and lesion size dependency. Many region of interest definitions are available, but increased complexity does not necessarily result in improved performance. Different methods for the quantification of the tissue of interest can introduce systematic and random inaccuracy.ConclusionsThis review provides an up-to-date overview of the many factors that influence quantification of glucose metabolism by FDG PET.

[1]  M Dahlbom,et al.  A comparison of normalization effects on three whole-body cylindrical 3D PET systems. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Jason P Fine,et al.  Influence of reconstruction iterations on 18F-FDG PET/CT standardized uptake values. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  18F-FDG PET in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Qualitative or Quantitative? , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  D. Visvikis,et al.  CT-based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of [18F]FDG uptake in PET , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  Adriaan A. Lammertsma,et al.  How should we analyse FDG PET studies for monitoring tumour response? , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  A novel iterative method for lesion delineation and volumetric quantification with FDG PET , 2007, Nuclear medicine communications.

[7]  W. Oyen,et al.  Chemotherapy response evaluation with FDG-PET in patients with colorectal cancer. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  M. Bandstra,et al.  Measurements of Fukushima fallout by the Berkeley Radiological Air and Water Monitoring project , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[9]  D. Feng,et al.  Models for computer simulation studies of input functions for tracer kinetic modeling with positron emission tomography. , 1993, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[10]  E. Rota Kops,et al.  The influence of plasma glucose levels on fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in bronchial carcinomas. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Yuji Nakamoto,et al.  Reproducibility of common semi-quantitative parameters for evaluating lung cancer glucose metabolism with positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose. , 2002, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[12]  H. Jacobsson,et al.  Reduction of FDG uptake in brown adipose tissue in clinical patients by a single dose of propranolol , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[13]  Stephan G. Nekolla,et al.  Local motion correction for lung tumours in PET/CT—first results , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  W. Oyen,et al.  Predictive and prognostic value of FDG-PET , 2008, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[15]  W H Wong,et al.  A clinically practical method to acquire parametric images of unidirectional metabolic rates and blood spaces. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  Methods to monitor response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with 18F-FDG PET. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  J. Karp,et al.  Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Adriaan A. Lammertsma,et al.  Measuring [18F]FDG uptake in breast cancer during chemotherapy: comparison of analytical methods , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  F. Jardin,et al.  Does chemotherapy influence the quantification of SUV when contrast-enhanced CT is used in PET/CT in lymphoma? , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Comparison of different SUV-based methods for monitoring cytotoxic therapy with FDG PET , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  C.C. Watson,et al.  Advances in scatter correction for 3D PET/CT , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[22]  M. Defrise,et al.  Attenuation correction in whole-body FDG oncological studies: the role of statistical reconstruction , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Frederick D. Grant,et al.  Constant ambient temperature of 24°C significantly reduces FDG uptake by brown adipose tissue in children scanned during the winter , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[24]  W. Oyen,et al.  The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[25]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[26]  L M Hamberg,et al.  Simplified measurement of deoxyglucose utilization rate. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  Claus Svarer,et al.  Cluster analysis in kinetic modelling of the brain: a noninvasive alternative to arterial sampling , 2004, NeuroImage.

[28]  Claude Nahmias,et al.  Reproducibility of Standardized Uptake Value Measurements Determined by 18F-FDG PET in Malignant Tumors , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  S. Larson,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative comparison between images obtained with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction in prostate cancer lesions of (18)F-FDG PET. , 2002, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[30]  G. Peters,et al.  Positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose for response monitoring in locally advanced gastroesophageal cancer; a comparison of different analytical methods. , 2003, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[31]  Chisato Kondo,et al.  Comparison of Imaging Protocols for 18F-FDG PET/CT in Overweight Patients: Optimizing Scan Duration Versus Administered Dose , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  Adriaan A. Lammertsma,et al.  Use of arterialised venous instead of arterial blood for measurement of myocardial glucose metabolism during euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamping , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[33]  Mithat Gonen,et al.  Patterns of (18)F-FDG uptake in adipose tissue and muscle: a potential source of false-positives for PET. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  Stefan Eberl,et al.  Evaluation of two population-based input functions for quantitative neurological FDG PET studies , 1997, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[35]  Joel Karp,et al.  Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Tracer Kinetic Modeling in Nuclear Medicine: Theory and Applications , 2006 .

[37]  Adriaan A. Lammertsma,et al.  Effects of ROI definition and reconstruction method on quantitative outcome and applicability in a response monitoring trial , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[38]  R. Wahl,et al.  Intense (18)F-FDG uptake in brown fat can be reduced pharmacologically. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[39]  E. Palmer,et al.  Identification and importance of brown adipose tissue in adult humans. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  N. Gupta,et al.  Dependency of standardized uptake values of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose on body size: comparison of body surface area correction and lean body mass correction. , 1996, Nuclear medicine communications.

[41]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[42]  R L Wahl,et al.  Enhanced FDG-PET tumor imaging with correlation-coefficient filtered influx-constant images. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[43]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[44]  S. Holm,et al.  PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[45]  W. D. van Marken Lichtenbelt,et al.  Cold-activated brown adipose tissue in healthy men. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  Ludwig G Strauss,et al.  Shortened PET data acquisition protocol for the quantification of 18F-FDG kinetics. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[47]  Thomas K Lewellen,et al.  The FDG lumped constant in normal human brain. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[48]  Eric J. W. Visser,et al.  Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parameters , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[49]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Pre-medication to block [18F]FDG uptake in the brown adipose tissue of pediatric and adolescent patients , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[50]  Emmanuel Itti,et al.  Early 18F-FDG PET for Prediction of Prognosis in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment Versus Visual Analysis , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[51]  Jyh-Cheng Chen,et al.  Quantification method in [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose brain positron emission tomography using independent component analysis , 2005, Nuclear medicine communications.

[52]  David Brasse,et al.  Correction methods for random coincidences in fully 3D whole-body PET: impact on data and image quality. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[53]  T. Momose,et al.  Noninvasive method to obtain input function for measuring tissue glucose utilization of thoracic and abdominal organs. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[54]  Leyun Pan,et al.  Impact of Angiogenesis-Related Gene Expression on the Tracer Kinetics of 18F-FDG in Colorectal Tumors , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[55]  A. Alavi,et al.  Standardized uptake values of FDG: body surface area correction is preferable to body weight correction. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[56]  Stephen L Bacharach,et al.  Simplified kinetic analysis of tumor 18F-FDG uptake: a dynamic approach. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[57]  V. Gerbaudo,et al.  Low-Dose Oral Propranolol Could Reduce Brown Adipose Tissue F-18 FDG Uptake in Patients Undergoing PET Scans , 2007, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[58]  Hiroyuki Okada,et al.  Short dynamic FDG-PET imaging protocol for patients with lung cancer , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[59]  E. Gontier,et al.  High and typical 18F-FDG bowel uptake in patients treated with metformin , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[60]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  Effects of scatter on model parameter estimates in 3D PET studies of the human brain , 1995 .

[61]  G. Glatting,et al.  FDG PET: elevated plasma glucose reduces both uptake and detection rate of pancreatic malignancies. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[62]  S. Nehmeh,et al.  Respiratory motion in positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a review. , 2008, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[63]  F. Fazio,et al.  Errors Introduced by Tissue Heterogeneity in Estimation of Local Cerebral Glucose Utilization with Current Kinetic Models of the [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Method , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[64]  L. Boucher,et al.  Impact of Intravenous Insulin on 18F-FDG PET in Diabetic Cancer Patients , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[65]  Klaus Wienhard,et al.  Measurement of glucose consumption using [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose. , 2002, Methods.

[66]  Michael E Phelps,et al.  Combined Assessment of Metabolic and Volumetric Changes for Assessment of Tumor Response in Patients with Soft-Tissue Sarcomas , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[67]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Tomographic measurement of local cerebral glucose metabolic rate in humans with (F‐18)2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose: Validation of method , 1979, Annals of neurology.

[68]  M. Phelps,et al.  Quantification of serial tumor glucose metabolism. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[69]  John L. Humm,et al.  Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging. The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis. , 1999, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[70]  C. D. Arnett,et al.  Glucose Metabolic Rate Kinetic Model Parameter Determination in Humans: The Lumped Constants and Rate Constants for [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose and [11C]Deoxyglucose , 1985, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[71]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[72]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[73]  J. Berkhof,et al.  Physiological uptake of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose in the neck and upper chest region: are there predictive characteristics? , 2004, Nuclear medicine communications.

[74]  A. Agrawal,et al.  A novel approach for reduction of brown fat uptake on FDG PET. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[75]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Measurement of 18F-FDG concentrations in blood samples: comparison of direct calibration and standard solution methods. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[76]  Howard I. Scher,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative comparison between images obtained with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction in prostate cancer lesions on 18F-FDG PET , 2002 .

[77]  C S Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data , 1983, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[78]  R L Wahl,et al.  Lung cancer: reproducibility of quantitative measurements for evaluating 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake at PET. , 1995, Radiology.

[79]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[80]  Norihiro Sadato,et al.  Non-invasive estimation of the net influx constant using the standardized uptake value for quantification of FDG uptake of tumours , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[81]  F. Bénard,et al.  Optimization of Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography Imaging by Using Delayed 2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose Injection Following I.V. Insulin in Diabetic Patients , 2006, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[82]  R A Hawkins,et al.  A modeling method to improve quantitation of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in heterogeneous tumor tissue. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[83]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[84]  Y. Erdi,et al.  FDG-PET standardized uptake values in normal anatomical structures using iterative reconstruction segmented attenuation correction and filtered back-projection , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[85]  W. Oyen,et al.  Chemotherapy Response Evaluation with 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[86]  L M Hamberg,et al.  The dose uptake ratio as an index of glucose metabolism: useful parameter or oversimplification? , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[87]  J. Ruhlmann,et al.  Standardized uptake values of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: the value of different normalization orocedures , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[88]  R. Badawi,et al.  NEC: some coincidences are more equivalent than others. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[89]  B. Bendriem,et al.  Performance Characteristics of a New LSO PET/CT Scanner With Extended Axial Field-of-View and PSF Reconstruction , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[90]  Azriel Perel,et al.  Clinical review: Complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine , 2002, Critical care.

[91]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Blood Flow and Glucose Metabolism in Stage IV Breast Cancer: Heterogeneity of Response During Chemotherapy , 2008, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[92]  R. Coleman,et al.  Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[93]  J. Valentin,et al.  Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals , 1998 .

[94]  J. Orava,et al.  Functional brown adipose tissue in healthy adults. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[95]  Y Yonekura,et al.  Noninvasive estimation of FDG input function for quantification of cerebral metabolic rate of glucose: optimization and multicenter evaluation. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[96]  J. Keyes SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[97]  J. van den Hoff,et al.  Fundamentals of quantitative PET data analysis. , 2002, Current pharmaceutical design.

[98]  Jan Pruim,et al.  Comparison of image-derived and arterial input functions for estimating the rate of glucose metabolism in therapy-monitoring 18F-FDG PET studies. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[99]  A. A. Lammertsma,et al.  On the use of image-derived input functions in oncological fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography studies , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[100]  A A Lammertsma,et al.  Image-derived input functions for determination of MRGlu in cardiac (18)F-FDG PET scans. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[101]  Marc Kachelriess,et al.  Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[102]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Quantitative Analysis in Nuclear Medicine Imaging , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[103]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Monitoring response to therapy in cancer using [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose and positron emission tomography: an overview of different analytical methods , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[104]  B. Chin,et al.  Standardized Uptake Values in 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]Fluoro-D-Glucose with Positron Emission Tomography. Clinical Significance of Iterative Reconstruction and Segmented Attenuation Compared with Conventional Filtered Back Projection and Measured Attenuation Correction. , 2002, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[105]  E. Hoffman,et al.  TOMOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT OF LOCAL CEREBRAL GLUCOSE METABOLIC RATE IN HUMANS WITH (F‐18)2‐FLUORO-2‐DEOXY-D‐GLUCOSE: VALIDATION OF METHOD , 1980, Annals of neurology.

[106]  Quantitative Effects of Contrast Enhanced CT Attenuation Correction on PET SUV Measurements , 2008, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[107]  M. Ozaki,et al.  Evaluation of liver tumors using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET: characterization of tumor and assessment of effect of treatment. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[108]  U Ruotsalainen,et al.  Influence of the blood glucose concentration on FDG uptake in cancer--a PET study. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[109]  Stefan Eberl,et al.  Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[110]  P. Vernon,et al.  Application of intravenous contrast in PET/CT: does it really introduce significant attenuation correction error? , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[111]  I. Buvat,et al.  Partial-Volume Effect in PET Tumor Imaging* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[112]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[113]  K. Herholz,et al.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[114]  A. Alavi,et al.  Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[115]  M. Reivich,et al.  THE [14C]DEOXYGLUCOSE METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF LOCAL CEREBRAL GLUCOSE UTILIZATION: THEORY, PROCEDURE, AND NORMAL VALUES IN THE CONSCIOUS AND ANESTHETIZED ALBINO RAT 1 , 1977, Journal of neurochemistry.

[116]  D. Visvikis,et al.  Influence of OSEM and segmented attenuation correction in the calculation of standardised uptake values for [18F]FDG PET , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[117]  S M Larson,et al.  Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding , 1997, Cancer.

[118]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Breast imaging with fluorine-18-FDG PET: quantitative image analysis. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[119]  R L Wahl,et al.  Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction. , 1993, Radiology.

[120]  Roland L Bassett,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT as an Indicator of Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Osteosarcoma , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[121]  R. Wahl,et al.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[122]  J. Valentin,et al.  Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: (Addendum 2 to ICRP Publication 53) ICRP Publication 80 Approved by the Commission in September 1997 , 1998, Annals of the ICRP.

[124]  M. Muzi,et al.  What is in a number? The FDG lumped constant in the rat brain. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[125]  J. Berkhof,et al.  A Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Effect of Oral Diazepam on 18F-FDG Uptake in the Neck and Upper Chest Region , 2009, Molecular Imaging and Biology.