Air traffic is expected to continue to grow in the future and improved methods for dealing with the increased demand on the system need to be designed and implemented. One method for reducing surface congestion at airports is surface congestion management (SCM) (also commonly called departure queue management or departure metering). The concept generally involves holding aircraft at the gate or in the ramp area instead of releasing them onto the active movement area during periods of high departure demand. The FAA is planning to implement surface congestion management at airports where the cost/benefit analysis is favorable. Therefore, an estimate of the benefits of implementing surface congestion management in the future is necessary. To overcome the uncertainties and difficulties inherent in forecasting, this thesis adopts a multi-fidelity modeling approach and proposes three methods for estimating the benefits of SCM where the higher fidelity models study a subset of airports to inform and validate the lower fidelity models used on the entire set of airports. In the first model, a detailed analysis of a field trial of SCM at JFK airport is conducted using operational data. The second model estimates the benefits of implementing SCM at 8 major US airports from 2010 to 2030 by simulating congestion and performance levels through taxi time estimation. The last model explores several options for generalizing the results to 35 airports in the US. The results are also validated against historical benefits estimates as well as field trials of SCM where available. The findings show that SCM will result in fuel savings on the order of 1% of the total fuel burn in all stages of flight and between 5% and 45% of taxi-out fuel burn, depending on the airport. Thesis Supervisor: Ian Waitz Title: Dean of Engineering, Jerome Hunsaker Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor: Tom Reynolds Title: Technical Staff, MIT Lincoln Laboratory
[1]
Steven Stroiney,et al.
Departure queue management benefits across many airports
,
2011,
2011 Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference Proceedings.
[2]
Michael O. Ball,et al.
Collaborative decision making in air traffic management current and future research directions
,
2001
.
[3]
Harshad Khadilkar,et al.
DEMONSTRATION OF REDUCED AIRPORT CONGESTION THROUGH PUSHBACK RATE CONTROL
,
2014
.
[4]
Nicolas Pujet,et al.
Input-output modeling and control of the departure process of congested airports
,
1999
.
[5]
Tom G. Reynolds,et al.
Analysis of a Surface Congestion Management Technique at New York JFK Airport
,
2011
.
[6]
Nikolas Pyrgiotis,et al.
An Analytical Queuing Model of Airport Departure Processes for Taxi Out Time Prediction
,
2010
.
[7]
J. MacQueen.
Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations
,
1967
.
[8]
John-Paul Clarke,et al.
Queuing Model for Taxi-Out Time Estimation
,
2002
.
[9]
Leo Breiman,et al.
Random Forests
,
2001,
Machine Learning.
[10]
Dipasis Bhadra,et al.
Benefits of Virtual Queuing at Congested Airports Using ASDE-X: a Case Study of JFK Airport
,
2012
.
[11]
Kimberly Noonan.
FAA's system-wide analysis capability
,
2011,
ICNS 2011.
[12]
Robert A. Shumsky.
Dynamic statistical models for the prediction of aircraft take-off times
,
1995
.
[13]
Ioannis Simaiakis.
Modeling and control of airport departure processes for emissions reduction
,
2009
.