Repulsive bimodal atomic force microscopy on polymers

Bimodal atomic force microscopy can provide high-resolution images of polymers. In the bimodal operation mode, two eigenmodes of the cantilever are driven simultaneously. When examining polymers, an effective mechanical contact is often required between the tip and the sample to obtain compositional contrast, so particular emphasis was placed on the repulsive regime of dynamic force microscopy. We thus investigated bimodal imaging on a polystyrene-block-polybutadiene diblock copolymer surface and on polystyrene. The attractive operation regime was only stable when the amplitude of the second eigenmode was kept small compared to the amplitude of the fundamental mode. To clarify the influence of the higher eigenmode oscillation on the image quality, the amplitude ratio of both modes was systematically varied. Fourier analysis of the time series recorded during imaging showed frequency mixing. However, these spurious signals were at least two orders of magnitude smaller than the first two fundamental eigenmodes. Thus, repulsive bimodal imaging of polymer surfaces yields a good signal quality for amplitude ratios smaller than A01/A02 = 10:1 without affecting the topography feedback.

[1]  S. Solares,et al.  Triple-frequency intermittent contact atomic force microscopy characterization: Simultaneous topographical, phase, and frequency shift contrast in ambient air , 2010 .

[2]  A. Raman,et al.  Microcantilever dynamics in liquid environment dynamic atomic force microscopy when using higher-order cantilever eigenmodes , 2010 .

[3]  Ernst Meyer,et al.  Systematic achievement of improved atomic-scale contrast via bimodal dynamic force microscopy. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[4]  Daniel Platz,et al.  Reconstructing nonlinearities with intermodulation spectroscopy. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[5]  Xin Xu,et al.  Compositional contrast of biological materials in liquids using the momentary excitation of higher eigenmodes in dynamic atomic force microscopy. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[6]  R. Stark Dynamics of repulsive dual-frequency atomic force microscopy , 2009 .

[7]  Daniel Platz,et al.  Intermodulation atomic force microscopy , 2008 .

[8]  R. Stark,et al.  Nanotomography with enhanced resolution using bimodal atomic force microscopy , 2008 .

[9]  R. Stark,et al.  Frequency modulated torsional resonance mode atomic force microscopy on polymers , 2008 .

[10]  Ricardo Garcia,et al.  Theory of multifrequency atomic force microscopy. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[11]  Ricardo Garcia,et al.  Force microscopy imaging of individual protein molecules with sub‐pico Newton force sensitivity , 2007, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[12]  H. Dankowicz,et al.  Controlling bistability in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy using dual-frequency excitation , 2007 .

[13]  Olav Solgaard,et al.  An atomic force microscope tip designed to measure time-varying nanomechanical forces , 2007, Nature Nanotechnology.

[14]  Ricardo Garcia,et al.  Nanoscale compositional mapping with gentle forces. , 2007, Nature materials.

[15]  Andreas Stemmer,et al.  Multifrequency electrostatic force microscopy in the repulsive regime , 2007 .

[16]  R. Garcia,et al.  Enhanced compositional sensitivity in atomic force microscopy by the excitation of the first two flexural modes , 2006 .

[17]  Roger Proksch,et al.  Multifrequency, repulsive-mode amplitude-modulated atomic force microscopy , 2006 .

[18]  Ricardo Garcia,et al.  Identification of nanoscale dissipation processes by dynamic atomic force microscopy. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[19]  H. Hölscher,et al.  Imaging of biomaterials in liquids: a comparison between conventional and Q-controlled amplitude modulation (‘tapping mode’) atomic force microscopy , 2006, Nanotechnology.

[20]  Ricardo Garcia,et al.  Compositional mapping of surfaces in atomic force microscopy by excitation of the second normal mode of the microcantilever , 2004 .

[21]  Armin Knoll,et al.  Phase behavior in thin films of cylinder-forming ABA block copolymers: experiments. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[22]  A. Knoll,et al.  Phase behavior in thin films of cylinder-forming block copolymers. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[23]  Martin Stark,et al.  Inverting dynamic force microscopy: From signals to time-resolved interaction forces , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  J. Gilman,et al.  Nanotechnology , 2001 .

[25]  A. Knoll,et al.  Tapping mode atomic force microscopy on polymers: Where is the true sample surface? , 2001 .

[26]  Ricardo Garcia,et al.  Attractive and repulsive tip-sample interaction regimes in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy , 1999 .

[27]  Robert W. Stark,et al.  Tapping-mode atomic force microscopy and phase-imaging in higher eigenmodes , 1999 .

[28]  Jason Cleveland,et al.  Energy dissipation in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy , 1998 .

[29]  Roland G. Winkler,et al.  Tapping scanning force microscopy in air - theory and experiment , 1997 .

[30]  Darrell H. Reneker,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF POLYMER SURFACES WITH ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY , 1997 .

[31]  C. Tanford Macromolecules , 1994, Nature.

[32]  N. Burnham Apparent and true feature heights in force microscopy , 1993 .

[33]  Sergei Magonov,et al.  AFM study of thermotropic structural transitions in poly(diethylsiloxane) , 1997 .