Hunter Perceptions of Similarity and Trust in Wildlife Agencies and Personal Risk Associated with Chronic Wasting Disease

Theory suggests that risk perceptions are influenced by trust in managing agencies. Shared goals and values (i.e., perceived similarity) are foundations of trust. This article examines the extent to which hunters perceive personal health risks associated with chronic wasting disease (CWD) (e.g., become ill from CWD) and the influence of perceived similarity and trust in state wildlife agencies as determinants of risk. Data were obtained from surveys (n = 9567) of resident and nonresident deer and elk hunters in eight states. Structural equation models showed that across all strata, hunters' perceptions of similarity with agencies positively influenced trust in agencies to manage CWD, explaining up to 49% of the variance in trust. Hunters who trusted agencies perceived less risk associated with CWD, but trust only explained up to 8% of the variance in risk. Hunters perceived similarity with and trust in wildlife agencies, but still perceived risks associated with CWD.

[1]  Patricia L. Winter,et al.  Trust And Social Representations Of The Management Of Threatened And Endangered Species , 2003 .

[2]  Wouter Poortinga,et al.  Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  Lennart Sjöberg,et al.  Risk Perception by the Public and by Experts: A Dilemma in Risk Management 1 , 1999 .

[4]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Perceived risk: psychological factors and social implications , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[7]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[8]  Michael T. Watkins.  Principles of Persuasion , 2001 .

[9]  L Sjöberg,et al.  Limits of Knowledge and the Limited Importance of Trust , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  L. Sjöberg,et al.  Factors in risk perception. , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  T. L. Brown,et al.  Trends in hunting participation and implications for management of game species. , 2000 .

[13]  J. Vaske,et al.  Hunters’ Behavior and Acceptance of Management Actions Related to Chronic Wasting Disease in Eight States , 2004 .

[14]  W. Dean,et al.  Competing Conceptions of Risk , 1996 .

[15]  Lennart Sjöberg,et al.  Are Received Risk Perception Models Alive and Well? , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  Timothy C. Earle,et al.  Social Trust , 1995 .

[18]  Mattias Viklund.  Trust and Risk Perception in Western Europe: A Cross‐National Study , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  T. Heberlein,et al.  Changes in U.S. hunting participation, 1980–90 , 1996 .

[20]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[21]  E. Chéron,et al.  Leisure Activities and Perceived Risk , 1982 .

[22]  Sarah McCaffrey,et al.  Examining Social Trust in Fuels Management Strategies , 2004, Journal of Forestry.

[23]  C. Sigurdson,et al.  [Prion diseases?]. , 1985, Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift.

[24]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  Robert E. O'Connor,et al.  Determinants of Risk Perceptions of a Hazardous Waste Site , 1992 .

[26]  Tara L. Teel,et al.  Why Are Public Values Toward Wildlife Changing? , 2003 .

[27]  Michael W. Miller,et al.  Chronic Wasting Disease and Potential Transmission to Humans , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[28]  Jerry J. Vaske,et al.  Communicating Judgments About Practical Significance: Effect Size, Confidence Intervals and Odds Ratios , 2002 .

[29]  Craig W. Trumbo,et al.  The Function of Credibility in Information Processing for Risk Perception , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[30]  H. Zinn,et al.  Values, Gender, and Concern about Potentially Dangerous Wildlife , 2002 .

[31]  J. Vaske,et al.  Information Sources and Knowledge about Chronic Wasting Disease in Colorado and Wisconsin , 2006 .

[32]  M. Siegrist.  The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[33]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of risk: the influence of general trust, and general confidence , 2005 .

[34]  Andrew Weyman,et al.  Critical trust: understanding lay perceptions of health and safety risk regulation , 2004 .

[35]  S. Riley,et al.  Risk perception as a factor in Wildlife Stakeholder Acceptance Capacity for cougars in montana , 2000 .

[36]  Sarah McCaffrey.  Thinking of Wildfire as a Natural Hazard , 2004 .

[37]  Michael W. Miller,et al.  Chronic Wasting Disease of Deer and Elk: A Review with Recommendations for Management , 2002 .

[38]  Craig A. Miller.  Deer Hunter Participation and Chronic Wasting Disease in Illinois: An Assessment at Time Zero , 2004 .

[39]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High‐Level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model , 1992 .

[40]  Lennart Sjöberg,et al.  Perceived risk and tampering with nature , 2000 .

[41]  Joachim Scholderer,et al.  Communicating about the Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Foods: The Mediating Role of Trust , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[42]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. , 1995 .

[43]  N. Thompson Hobbs,et al.  Environmental Sources of Prion Transmission in Mule Deer , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[44]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[45]  Patricia L. Winter,et al.  Anticipated responses to a fee program: the key is trust. , 1999 .

[46]  J. Vaske,et al.  Chronic Wasting Disease in Wisconsin: Hunter Behavior, Perceived Risk, and Agency Trust , 2004 .

[47]  Branden B. Johnson,et al.  Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust , 1999 .

[48]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Shared Values, Social Trust, and the Perception of Geographic Cancer Clusters , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[49]  M. Miller,et al.  SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY IN FREE-RANGING MULE DEER (ODOCOILEUS HEMIONUS), WHITE-TAILED DEER (ODOCOILEUS VIRGINIANUS) AND ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK (CERVUS ELAPHUS NELSONI) IN NORTHCENTRAL COLORADO , 1997, Journal of wildlife diseases.