New insights into the mechanisms of signal formation in RF‐spoiled gradient echo sequences

RF spoiling is a well established method to produce T1‐weighted images with short repetition‐time gradient‐echo sequences, by eliminating coherent transverse magnetization with appropriate RF phase modulation. This paper presents 2 novel approaches to describe signal formation in such sequences. Both methods rely on the formulation of RF spoiling as a linear increase of the precession angle between RF pulses, which is an alternative to the commonly used quadratic pulse phase scheme. The first technique demonstrates that a steady state signal can be obtained by integrating over all precession angles within the voxel, in spite of the lack of a genuine steady‐state for separate isochromats. This clear mathematical framework allows a straightforward incorporation of off‐resonance effects and detector phase settings. Moreover, it naturally introduces the need for a large net gradient area per repetition interval. In the second step, a modified partition method including RF spoiling is developed to obtain explicit expressions for all signal components. This provides a physical interpretation of the deviations from ideal spoiling behavior in FLASH and echo‐shifted sequences. The results of the partition method in the small flip angle regime are compared with numerical simulations based on a Fourier decomposition of magnetization states. Measurements performed with in vitro solutions were in good agreement with numerical simulations at short relaxation times (T1/TR = 32 and T2/TR = 4); larger deviations occurred at long relaxation times (T1/TR = 114 and T2/TR = 82). Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[2]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Elimination of transverse coherences in FLASH MRI , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  D G Nishimura,et al.  Fluctuating equilibrium MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  W T Sobol,et al.  On the stationary states in gradient echo imaging , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Steady-State Magnetizations in Rapid NMR Imaging Using Small Flip Angles and Short Repetition Intervals , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  H Bruder,et al.  A new steady‐state imaging sequence for simultaneous acquisition of two MR images with clearly different contrasts , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  T. Metens,et al.  On the calculation and interpretation of signal intensity in echo‐shifted sequences , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  J H Duyn,et al.  Steady state effects in fast gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  E. T. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers , 1946, Nature.

[10]  M. L. Wood,et al.  Spoiling of transverse magnetization in steady‐state sequences , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  T W Redpath,et al.  FADE–A new fast imaging sequence , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Thierry Metens,et al.  Three‐dimensional BOLD fMRI with spin‐echo characteristics using T2 magnetization preparation and echo‐planar readouts , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  K. Scheffler A pictorial description of steady-states in rapid magnetic resonance imaging , 1999 .

[14]  G. Arfken Mathematical Methods for Physicists , 1967 .

[15]  Analysis of the higher‐order echoes in SSFP , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Dwight G Nishimura,et al.  Oscillating dual‐equilibrium steady‐state angiography , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  J. Hennig Echoes—how to generate, recognize, use or avoid them in MR‐imaging sequences. Part I: Fundamental and not so fundamental properties of spin echoes , 1991 .

[18]  Richard R. Ernst,et al.  Diffusion and field‐gradient effects in NMR Fourier spectroscopy , 1974 .

[19]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance in one and two dimensions , 1987 .

[20]  Jürgen Hennig,et al.  Echoes—how to generate, recognize, use or avoid them in MR‐imaging sequences. Part II: Echoes in imaging sequences , 1991 .

[21]  J P Mugler,et al.  Spoiling of transverse magnetization in gradient‐echo (GRE) imaging during the approach to steady state , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  J. Pauly,et al.  Characterization and reduction of the transient response in steady‐state MR imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  R. R. Ernst,et al.  Application of Fourier Transform Spectroscopy to Magnetic Resonance , 1966 .

[24]  J. Hogg Magnetic resonance imaging. , 1994, Journal of the Royal Naval Medical Service.

[25]  J L Duerk,et al.  Signal formation in echo‐shifted sequences , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Godfrey H. Hardy,et al.  An introduction to the theory of numbers (5. ed.) , 1995 .

[27]  F. Barrios,et al.  3‐dimensional functional imaging of human brain using echo‐shifted FLASH MRI , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Richard B. Buxton,et al.  Signal intensity in fast NMR imaging with short repetition times , 1989 .

[29]  Z H Cho,et al.  Fast SSFP gradient echo sequence for simultaneous acquisitions of FID and echo signals , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  D. Weinberger,et al.  Three-dimensional functional magnetic resonance imaging of human brain on a clinical 1.5-T scanner. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  M. Gyngell,et al.  The application of steady-state free precession in rapid 2DFT NMR imaging: FAST and CE-FAST sequences. , 1988, Magnetic resonance imaging.