In order to design robots suited to engage in cooperative manipulation tasks with humans, we study human-human teams as they work together to move a heavy object across a room. We are interested in several questions. First, do two person, gross motion tasks follow the same sinusoidal pattern, one person fine motion tasks do? Does performance improve when audio or visual communication is permitted? How does performance correlate with an individual's perception of performance? Non-physiological, or performance based, studies of human-human cooperation can be divided into two categories: Haptic and Non-Haptic (audio, visual, etc). The first category, involves physical interaction through the object being manipulated via force, pressure, and tactile sensations (Jones and Sarter 2008), (Reed and Peshkin 2008). Most of the non-haptic experiments are virtual setups where individuals are moving an object together on a computer screen via two controllers (Basdogan, Ho, and Srinivasan 2000), (Sallnas and Zhai 2003). A survey on the role of communication between people appears in (Whitaker, 2003). The novelty of our work is to investigate non-haptic communication in haptic manipulation tasks.
[1]
Lynette A. Jones,et al.
Tactile Displays: Guidance for Their Design and Application
,
2008,
Hum. Factors.
[2]
A. Graesser,et al.
Handbook of discourse processes
,
2003
.
[3]
Shumin Zhai,et al.
Collaboration Meets Fitts' Law: Passing Virtual Objects with and without Haptic Force Feedback
,
2003,
INTERACT.
[4]
Kyle B. Reed,et al.
Physical Collaboration of Human-Human and Human-Robot Teams
,
2008,
IEEE Transactions on Haptics.
[5]
Denis Mottet,et al.
Behind Fitts' law: kinematic patterns in goal-directed movements
,
2004,
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[6]
Cagatay Basdogan,et al.
An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments
,
2000,
TCHI.
[7]
Steve Whittaker,et al.
Theories and methods in mediated communication
,
2003
.