Measuring and Visualising Projects' Collective Method Rationale

Existing research provide frameworks for analysing the rationale behind engineering methods and how this rationale matches the rationale of individual project members. As methods are used in groups, this raises questions about how to study method rationale on an aggregated project level. We propose an elaboration of method rationale theory to enable this type of analysis. We introduce the concept of collective method rationale together with metrics to capture this aggregated rationale. The conceptual work is implemented in a computerized tool, which enables analyses of collective method rationale in product development projects. These are the results of an action research project and we present a pilot test of the computerized tool to demonstrate the concept.

[1]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Review: Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies , 1995 .

[2]  Fredrik Karlsson,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Time Distortion Analysis in Method Components , 2014, BMMDS/EMMSAD.

[3]  Colette Rolland,et al.  Towards a Generic Model for Situational Method Engineering , 2003, CAiSE.

[4]  Kai Wistrand Method rationale revealed : communication of knowledge in systems development methods , 2009 .

[5]  Fredrik Karlsson,et al.  Longitudinal use of method rationale in method configuration: an exploratory study , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Pär J. Ågerfalk Towards better understanding of agile values in global software development , 2006 .

[7]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Diversity in information systems action research methods , 1998 .

[8]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Towards Structured Flexibility in Information Systems Development: Devising a Method for Method Configuration , 2009, J. Database Manag..

[9]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[10]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools , 1996, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[11]  A. Nico Habermann,et al.  The Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University , 1986, System Development and Ada.

[12]  Juha-Pekka Tolvanen,et al.  Method rationale in method engineering , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  Juha-Pekka Tolvanen,et al.  Managing Evolutionary Method Engineering by Method Rationale , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Exploring the intellectual structures of information systems development: A social action theoretic analysis , 1996 .

[15]  Fredrik Karlsson,et al.  Combining method engineering with activity theory: theoretical grounding of the method component concept , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Method configuration: adapting to situational characteristics while creating reusable assets , 2004, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[17]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .

[18]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Systems Development Method Rationale: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis , 2003, ICEIS.

[19]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Exploring the assumptions underlying information systems methodologies: Their impact on past, present and future ISM research , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.