Portable battery lifespans and new estimation method for battery collection rate based on a lifespan modeling approach

Separate collection and recycling of used batteries is required in the EU member states and other countries, as a measure for environmentally sound management of batteries. Monitoring of collection rate of the separate battery stream is important for decision making, in particular for implementing interventions to improve the separate collection and evaluating their results. Limitations of the currently applied method for the estimation of battery collection rate are discussed and a new method, which improves the estimation, is suggested. The method utilizes a more accurate way of estimating the total battery waste generation. This estimation is based on batteries historical consumption estimated with material flow analysis method and distributions of batteries lifespan obtained from empirical data. Empirical data from two decades of battery consumption and disposal in Sweden were analyzed and lifespan distributions have been found for eight different types of batteries by dating over 5000 disposed batteries. The lifespans stretched from 1 to 28 years, with a median lifespan of 3–8 years. It is shown how the use of lifespan distributions in the suggested method could considerably improve the estimation of the collection rate. Consequently, the intervention potentials can be identified more accurately and the decision making for investments in the collection system can be improved. The observed lifespans are also useful for understanding batteries fate in households as well as trends in battery consumption and disposal.

[1]  Shanying Hu,et al.  Estimation of Waste Battery Generation and Analysis of the Waste Battery Recycling System in China , 2017 .

[2]  Ester van der Voet,et al.  Dynamic stock modelling: A method for the identification and estimation of future waste streams and emissions based on past production and product stock characteristics , 2005 .

[3]  José Antonio Guevara-García,et al.  Used battery collection in central Mexico: metal content, legislative/management situation and statistical analysis. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  T. Tasaki,et al.  Lifespan of Commodities, Part I , 2010 .

[5]  Helmut Rechberger,et al.  Practical handbook of material flow analysis , 2003 .

[6]  João Patrício,et al.  Out with the old, out with the new--The effect of transitions in TVs and monitors technology on consumption and WEEE generation in Sweden 1996-2014. , 2015, Waste management.

[7]  Y. Kalmykova,et al.  Resource consumption drivers and pathways to reduction: economy, policy and lifestyle impact on material flows at the national and urban scale , 2016 .

[8]  P. Ferrão,et al.  A Material Flow Accounting Case Study of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area using the Urban Metabolism Analyst Model , 2014 .

[9]  Feng Wang,et al.  Enhancing e-waste estimates: improving data quality by multivariate Input-Output Analysis. , 2013, Waste management.

[10]  Masahiro Oguchi,et al.  Product flow analysis of various consumer durables in Japan , 2008 .

[11]  João Patrício,et al.  Primary and secondary battery consumption trends in Sweden 1996-2013: method development and detailed accounting by battery type. , 2015, Waste management.

[12]  I. Pulford Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) , 2013 .

[13]  João Patrício,et al.  Urban Economies Resource Productivity and Decoupling: Metabolism Trends of 1996-2011 in Sweden, Stockholm, and Gothenburg. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Seiji Hashimoto,et al.  Lifespan of Commodities, Part II , 2010 .

[15]  João Patrício,et al.  Uncertainty in Material Flow Analysis Indicators at Different Spatial Levels , 2015 .