Radiation Risks and Interventional Cardiology: The Value of Radiation Reduction Exposure

Fluoroscopically guided cardiac procedures are an essential component of care in the practice of cardiology, and are, in most cases, lifesaving [...].

[1]  C. Baudin,et al.  Ionizing radiation exposure during adulthood and risk of developing central nervous system tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[2]  J. Campolo,et al.  Congenital Heart Disease and the Risk of Cancer: An Update on the Genetic Etiology, Radiation Exposure Damage, and Future Research Strategies , 2022, Journal of cardiovascular development and disease.

[3]  C. Baudin,et al.  Risk of Developing Non-Cancerous Central Nervous System Diseases Due to Ionizing Radiation Exposure during Adulthood: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses , 2022, Brain sciences.

[4]  Qi Jin,et al.  Comparison of the Mid-Term Outcomes of Robotic Magnetic Navigation-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation , 2022, Journal of cardiovascular development and disease.

[5]  Wen-Hwa Wang,et al.  Radiation Reduction and Protection for Radiosensitive Organs (Lens, Thyroid, and Genital Organs) of Patients Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention—Real-World Measurement of Radiation Dose in a Single Center , 2021, Journal of cardiovascular development and disease.

[6]  C. Baudin,et al.  Biomarkers of Genotoxicity in Medical Workers Exposed to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[7]  M. Rehani,et al.  Radiation risk issues in recurrent imaging. , 2021, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  R. Vijayvergiya,et al.  Radiation Exposure Reduction and Patient Outcome by Using Very Low Frame Rate Fluoroscopy Protocol (3.8 + 7.5 fps) During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2021, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[9]  F. Bourier,et al.  Multicenter, randomized comparison between magnetically navigated and manually guided radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (the MagMa-AVNRT-trial) , 2017, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[10]  Shwn-Huey Shieh,et al.  Risk of cancer among cardiologists who frequently perform percutaneous coronary interventions: a population‐based study , 2016, European journal of clinical investigation.

[11]  E. Piccaluga,et al.  Occupational Health Risks in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Workers , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[12]  Chieh-Shan Wu,et al.  Leukemia Risk After Cardiac Fluoroscopic Interventions Stratified by Procedure Number, Exposure Latent Time, and Sex , 2016, Medicine.

[13]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Patient skin reactions from interventional fluoroscopy procedures. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  H. Heidbuchel,et al.  The appropriate and justified use of medical radiation in cardiovascular imaging: a position document of the ESC Associations of Cardiovascular Imaging, Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Electrophysiology. , 2014, European heart journal.

[15]  Olivier Laurent,et al.  Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Circulatory Disease from Exposure to Low-Level Ionizing Radiation and Estimates of Potential Population Mortality Risks , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[16]  Maria Grazia Andreassi,et al.  Radiation risk from pediatric cardiac catheterization: friendly fire on children with congenital heart disease. , 2009, Circulation.

[17]  Stephen Balter,et al.  ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task , 2005, Circulation.