Accounting for Individual Differences in Bradley-Terry Models by Means of Recursive Partitioning

The preference scaling of a group of subjects may not be homogeneous, but different groups of subjects with certain characteristics may show different preference scalings, each of which can be derived from paired comparisons by means of the Bradley-Terry model. Usually, either different models are fit in predefined subsets of the sample or the effects of subject covariates are explicitly specified in a parametric model. In both cases, categorical covariates can be employed directly to distinguish between the different groups, while numeric covariates are typically discretized prior to modeling. Here, a semiparametric approach for recursive partitioning of Bradley-Terry models is introduced as a means for identifying groups of subjects with homogeneous preference scalings in a data-driven way. In this approach, the covariates that—in main effects or interactions—distinguish between groups of subjects with different preference orderings, are detected automatically from the set of candidate covariates. One main advantage of this approach is that sensible partitions in numeric covariates are also detected automatically.

[1]  M. Wedel,et al.  Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations , 1997 .

[2]  R. Davidson On Extending the Bradley-Terry Model to Accommodate Ties in Paired Comparison Experiments , 1970 .

[3]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS , 1952 .

[4]  K. Hornik,et al.  party : A Laboratory for Recursive Partytioning , 2009 .

[5]  G. Tutz,et al.  An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[6]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS , 1952 .

[7]  Sylvain Choisel,et al.  Evaluation of multichannel reproduced sound: scaling auditory attributes underlying listener preference. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Regina Dittrich,et al.  Modelling the effect of subject‐specific covariates in paired comparison studies with an application to university rankings , 2001 .

[9]  U Böckenholt Hierarchical modeling of paired comparison data. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[10]  K. Bäuml,et al.  Effects of the beholder's age on the perception of facial attractiveness. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[11]  Brian Francis,et al.  Modelling dependency in multivariate paired comparisons: A log-linear approach , 2006, Math. Soc. Sci..

[12]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[13]  Georg Rasch,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests , 1981, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[14]  Roger R. Davidson,et al.  A Bibliography on the Method of Paired Comparisons , 1973 .

[15]  Ulf Böckenholt Thresholds and Intransitivities in Pairwise Judgments: A Multilevel Analysis , 2001 .

[16]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  psychotree - Recursive partitioning based on psychometric models: Version 0.12-1 , 2011 .

[17]  S. Dibb Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations (2nd edition) , 2000 .

[18]  H. Hecht,et al.  AMBIENT LIGHTING MODIFIES THE FLAVOR OF WINE , 2009 .

[19]  M. Davison,et al.  Testing Group Differences in Paired Comparisons Data , 1991 .

[20]  K. Hornik,et al.  Model-Based Recursive Partitioning , 2008 .

[21]  A. Tversky Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[22]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[23]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[24]  Ulf Böckenholt,et al.  Thresholds and Intransitivities in Pairwise Judgments: A Multilevel Analysis , 2001 .

[25]  K. Hornik,et al.  Generalized M‐fluctuation tests for parameter instability , 2007 .

[26]  H. A. David,et al.  The method of paired comparisons , 1966 .

[27]  Douglas E. Critchlow,et al.  Paired comparison, triple comparison, and ranking experiments as generalized linear models, and their implementation on GLIM , 1991 .

[28]  J. Matthews,et al.  An application of Bradley-Terry-type models to the measurement of pain , 1995 .

[29]  Ulf Böckenholt,et al.  Thurstonian-Based Analyses: Past, Present, and Future Utilities , 2006, Psychometrika.