Fast mental states decoding in mixed reality

The combination of Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology, allowing online monitoring and decoding of brain activity, with virtual and mixed reality (MR) systems may help to shape and guide implicit and explicit learning using ecological scenarios. Real-time information of ongoing brain states acquired through BCI might be exploited for controlling data presentation in virtual environments. Brain states discrimination during mixed reality experience is thus critical for adapting specific data features to contingent brain activity. In this study we recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) data while participants experienced MR scenarios implemented through the eXperience Induction Machine (XIM). The XIM is a novel framework modeling the integration of a sensing system that evaluates and measures physiological and psychological states with a number of actuators and effectors that coherently reacts to the user's actions. We then assessed continuous EEG-based discrimination of spatial navigation, reading and calculation performed in MR, using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. Dynamic single trial classification showed high accuracy of LDA and SVM classifiers in detecting multiple brain states as well as in differentiating between high and low mental workload, using a 5 s time-window shifting every 200 ms. Our results indicate overall better performance of LDA with respect to SVM and suggest applicability of our approach in a BCI-controlled MR scenario. Ultimately, successful prediction of brain states might be used to drive adaptation of data representation in order to boost information processing in MR.

[1]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Alberto Betella,et al.  BrainX3: embodied exploration of neural data , 2014, VRIC.

[3]  Aljoscha C. Neubauer,et al.  Ultradian rhythms in cognitive performance: no evidence for a 1.5-h rhythm , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[4]  J. Palva,et al.  New vistas for alpha-frequency band oscillations. , 2007, Trends in neurosciences.

[5]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  The Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Non-Medical Uses of BCI Technology , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[6]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Fully Online Multicommand Brain-Computer Interface with Visual Neurofeedback Using SSVEP Paradigm , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[7]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Prestimulus Oscillatory Activity in the Alpha Band Predicts Visual Discrimination Ability , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  José del R. Millán,et al.  Improving Human Performance in a Real Operating Environment through Real-Time Mental Workload Detection , 2007 .

[9]  J. Palva,et al.  New vistas for α-frequency band oscillations , 2007, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  Manuel Schabus,et al.  Increasing Individual Upper Alpha Power by Neurofeedback Improves Cognitive Performance in Human Subjects , 2005, Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback.

[11]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  T. Ergenoğlu,et al.  Alpha rhythm of the EEG modulates visual detection performance in humans. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  M. Boly,et al.  Baseline brain activity fluctuations predict somatosensory perception in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Andrea Miotto,et al.  CEEDs: Unleashing the Power of the Subconscious , 2011, FET.

[15]  P. Milgram,et al.  A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , 1994 .

[16]  Aleksander Väljamäe,et al.  Quantifying human subjective experience and social interaction using the eXperience Induction Machine , 2011, Brain Research Bulletin.

[17]  T. Fernández,et al.  EEG activation patterns during the performance of tasks involving different components of mental calculation. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  The complexity of reality and human computer confluence: stemming the data deluge by empowering human creativity , 2011, CHItaly.

[19]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[20]  R. VanRullen,et al.  The Phase of Ongoing EEG Oscillations Predicts Visual Perception , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Michitaka Hirose,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces, Virtual Reality, and Videogames , 2008, Computer.

[22]  Dipti Upadhyay Classification of EEG Signals under Different Mental Tasks Using Wavelet Transform and Neural Network with One Step Secant Algorithm , 2013 .

[23]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Improving Visual Perception through Neurofeedback , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[25]  S. Makeig,et al.  EEG changes accompanying learned regulation of 12-Hz EEG activity , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[26]  Anatole Lécuyer,et al.  Combining BCI with Virtual Reality: Towards New Applications and Improved BCI , 2012 .

[27]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Now You'll Feel It, Now You Won't: EEG Rhythms Predict the Effectiveness of Perceptual Masking , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Perceptual Learning Incepted by Decoded fMRI Neurofeedback Without Stimulus Presentation , 2011, Science.

[29]  Joseph R. Madsen,et al.  Human theta oscillations exhibit task dependence during virtual maze navigation , 1999, Nature.

[30]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  To See or Not to See: Prestimulus α Phase Predicts Visual Awareness , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  Corey J. Bohil,et al.  Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  Fürst Aj,et al.  The role of working memory in mental arithmetic. , 1998 .

[34]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Spatial Navigation in Virtual Reality Environments: An EEG Analysis , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[35]  J. Mourino,et al.  Asynchronous BCI and local neural classifiers: an overview of the adaptive brain interface project , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[36]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Machine learning for real-time single-trial EEG-analysis: From brain–computer interfacing to mental state monitoring , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[37]  Christa Neuper,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Class EEG Classification for Brain Computer Interface , 2005 .

[38]  Todd W. Thompson,et al.  When the brain is prepared to learn: Enhancing human learning using real-time fMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[39]  Jukka Heikkonen,et al.  A local neural classifier for the recognition of EEG patterns associated to mental tasks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[40]  A. Norcia,et al.  A method for investigating binocular rivalry in real-time with the steady-state VEP , 1997, Vision Research.

[41]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[42]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Subject-independent mental state classification in single trials , 2009, Neural Networks.

[43]  André Vandierendonck,et al.  The role of working memory in the carry operation of mental arithmetic: Number and value of the carry , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Machine-Learning-Based Coadaptive Calibration for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2011, Neural Computation.

[45]  Anatole Lécuyer,et al.  An overview of research on "passive" brain-computer interfaces for implicit human-computer interaction , 2010 .

[46]  A. Pope,et al.  Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[47]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic Fluctuations within Cortical Systems Account for Intertrial Variability in Human Behavior , 2007, Neuron.

[48]  Alberto Sanfeliu,et al.  XIM-engine: a software framework to support the development of interactive applications that uses conscious and unconscious reactions in immersive mixed reality , 2014, VRIC.

[49]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  An Application Framework for Controlling an Avatar in a Desktop-Based Virtual Environment via a Software SSVEP BrainComputer Interface , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[50]  Darryl G. Humphrey,et al.  Toward a Psychophysiological Assessment of Dynamic Changes in Mental Workload , 1994, Human factors.

[51]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Comparison of designs towards a subject-independent brain-computer interface based on motor imagery , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[52]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines , 2002, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[53]  T. Harmony The functional significance of delta oscillations in cognitive processing , 2013, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[54]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview , 2000, Bioinform..

[55]  Hilde T. Juvodden,et al.  Mal-Adaptation of Event-Related EEG Responses Preceding Performance Errors , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[56]  Yunqian Ma,et al.  Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression , 2004, Neural Networks.

[57]  Jefferson M. Koonce,et al.  Comprehension and workload differences for VDT and paper-based reading , 2001 .