Learning datives: The Tolerance Principle in monolingual and bilingual acquisition

We study the learnability problem concerning the dative alternations in English (Baker, 1979; Pinker, 1989). We consider how first language learners productively apply the double-object and to-dative constructions (give the book to library/give the library the book), while excluding negative exceptions (donate the book to the library/*donate the library the book). Our solution for first language acquisition is based on The Tolerance Principle, a formal model that detects productivity from the distributional properties of the input data (Yang, 2005, 2016). This principle predicts an acquisition stage where the constructions are productive, followed by a stage where learners retreat from overgeneralization and form more finely grained rules. This work calls for a formally rigorous model of acquisition, which can incorporate input effects and retain the benefits of an abstract generative grammar without resorting to piecemeal learning. We provide an analysis of child-directed speech in the CHILDES database to support the learning proposal for first language acquisition, while considering its potential applicability to second language (L2) acquisition and first language (L1) attrition.

[1]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[2]  Benjamin Bruening.  Double Object Constructions Disguised as Prepositional Datives , 2010, Linguistic Inquiry.

[3]  J. Bresnan,et al.  Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English , 2010 .

[4]  Cristóbal Lozano.  Learner corpora as a research tool for the investigation of lexical competence in L2 Spanish , 2015 .

[5]  Irene Mazurkewich,et al.  THE ACQUISITION OF THE DATIVE ALTERNATION BY SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND LINGUISTIC THEORY , 1984 .

[6]  Charles Yang,et al.  The Price of Linguistic Productivity: How Children Learn to Break the Rules of Language , 2016 .

[7]  Shigenori Tanaka.  The Selective Use of Specific Exemplars in Second-Language Performance: The Case of The Dative Alternation* , 1987 .

[8]  Todd R. Risley,et al.  The Early Catastrophe. The 30 Million Word Gap. , 2003 .

[9]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  The Acquisition of the English Causative Alternation , 2008 .

[10]  Kristof Baten,et al.  The acquisition of the English dative alternation by Russian Foreign Language Learners , 2014 .

[11]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity1 , 2008, Journal of Linguistics.

[12]  Eunjeong Oh,et al.  Recovery from first-language transfer: The second language acquisition of English double objects by Korean speakers , 2010 .

[13]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  Explanation in Linguistics: The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition , 1982 .

[14]  B. Levin.  Dative Verbs and Dative Alternations from a Crosslinguistic Perspective , 2008 .

[15]  Heidi Harley,et al.  Possession and the double object construction , 2002 .

[16]  Robert Bley-Vroman,et al.  Road and Narrow Constraints on the English Dative Alternation: Some Fundamental Differences Between Native Speakers and Foreign Language Learners , 1992 .

[17]  Sylviane Granger,et al.  Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching , 2002 .

[18]  William E. Nagy,et al.  The acquisition of English derivational morphology , 1989 .

[19]  F. Grosjean.  Language Dominance in Bilinguals: The Complementarity Principle and its impact on processing, acquisition, and dominance , 2015 .

[20]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Lexical Constraints on Syntactic Acquisition , 1987, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[21]  B. MacWhinney.  The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[22]  Charles D. Yang,et al.  Knowledge and learning in natural language , 2000 .

[23]  María Cristina Cuervo.  DOUBLE OBJECTS IN SPANISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE: Acquisition of Morphosyntax and Semantics , 2007, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[24]  Rex A. Sprouse,et al.  L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model , 1996 .

[25]  M. Maratsos.  More overregularizations after all: new data and discussion on Marcus, Pinker, Ullman, Hollander, Rosen & Xu , 2000, Journal of Child Language.

[26]  Mark Aronoff,et al.  Word Formation in Generative Grammar , 1979 .

[27]  S. Montrul.  Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor , 2008 .

[28]  Lan-Hsin Chang,et al.  Discourse Effects on EFL Learners' Production of Dative Constructions , 2004 .

[29]  Charles D. Yang,et al.  Morphosyntactic Learning and the Development of Tense , 2007 .

[30]  Cristina Flores.  The effect of age on language attrition: Evidence from bilingual returnees , 2010 .

[31]  Janet D. Fodor.  Unambiguous Triggers , 1998, Linguistic Inquiry.

[32]  Carla L. Hudson Kam,et al.  Regularizing Unpredictable Variation: The Roles of Adult and Child Learners in Language Formation and Change , 2005 .

[33]  Charles D. Yang,et al.  Morphology and Language Acquisition , 2016 .

[34]  Guy Aston,et al.  Corpora and language learners , 2004 .

[35]  Gisela Håkansson.  Teacher Talk: How Teachers Modify Their Speech When Addressing Learners of Swedish As a Second Language , 1987 .

[36]  J. Berko.  The Child's Learning of English Morphology , 1958 .

[37]  W. Snyder.  The structure and acquisition of English dative constructions , 1997 .

[38]  S. Montrul,et al.  Dominant Language Transfer in Spanish Heritage Speakers and Second Language Learners in the Interpretation of Definite Articles , 2012 .

[39]  S. Pinker.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[40]  Fernando Luiz Pereira de Oliveira,et al.  Selective transfer in the acquisition of English double object constructions by Brazilian learners , 2013 .

[41]  Matthew Baerman,et al.  Defective Paradigms: Missing Forms and What They Tell Us , 2010 .

[42]  Patsy M. Lightbown,et al.  Input and Acquisition for Second-language Learners In and Out of Classrooms , 1985 .

[43]  Georgia M. Green,et al.  Semantics and Syntactic Regularity , 1974 .

[44]  Yvonne Freeh,et al.  Words And Rules The Ingredients Of Language , 2016 .

[45]  Bezalel Elan Dresher,et al.  Charting the Learning Path: Cues to Parameter Setting , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[46]  Linda Wilbanks,et al.  IT Productivity = ?? , 2009, IT Prof..

[47]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Generalization as Search , 2002 .

[48]  H. Marefat.  The Impact of Information Structure as a Discourse Factor on the Acquisition of Dative Alternation by L2 Learners , 2005 .

[49]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation , 1989 .

[50]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[51]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  Parameter setting is feasible , 2017 .

[52]  Roger Hawkins,et al.  Markedness and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by L2 speakers , 1987 .

[53]  Lydia White,et al.  Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar , 1990, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[54]  R. J. Catalán,et al.  VOCABULARY INPUT IN EFL TEXTBOOKS , 2008 .

[55]  Silvina Andrea Montrul,et al.  On Binding Asymmetries in DativeAlternation Constructions in L2 Spanish , 2006 .

[56]  Herbert W. Seliger.  First language attrition: Language attrition, reduced redundancy, and creativity , 1991 .

[57]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  Double Objects Again , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[58]  Roumyana Slabakova,et al.  Meaning in the second language , 2008 .

[59]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure , 2002 .

[60]  益子 真由美.  Argument Structure , 1993, The Lexicon.

[61]  Robert Bley-Vroman,et al.  The logical problem of foreign language learning , 1989 .

[62]  S Pinker,et al.  Weird past tense forms , 1995, Journal of Child Language.

[63]  Andrew Carnie,et al.  Argument hierarchies and the mapping principle , 2003 .

[64]  Richard Thomas Oehrle,et al.  The grammatical status of the English dative alternation , 1976 .

[65]  A. L. Campbell,et al.  The acquisition of English dative constructions , 2001, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[66]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[67]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[68]  Noam Chomsky.  Three Factors in Language Design , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[69]  Violeta Demonte,et al.  Dative alternation in Spanish , 1995 .

[70]  Linda D. Jarmulowicz,et al.  English Derivational Suffix Frequency and Children's Stress Judgments , 2002, Brain and Language.

[71]  J. Hayes.  Cognition and the development of language , 1970 .

[72]  Alan Juffs,et al.  Learnability and the Lexicon , 1996 .

[73]  S Pinker,et al.  Overregularization in language acquisition. , 1992, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[74]  William Gregory Sakas,et al.  Disambiguating Syntactic Triggers , 2012 .

[75]  Maik Walter,et al.  Argument Realisation, Information Status and Syntactic Weight … A Learner-Corpus Study of the Dative Alternation , 2008 .

[76]  Gerald J. Sussman,et al.  Sparse Representations for Fast, One-Shot Learning , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[77]  Michael H. Long.  Linguistic and Conversational Adjustments to Non-Native Speakers , 1983, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[78]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts , 1981, Cognition.

[79]  M. Halle.  Prolegomena to a theory of word formation , 1973 .

[80]  Shunji Inagaki,et al.  Japanese and Chinese Learners' Acquisition of the Narrow‐Range Rules for the Dative Alternation in English , 1997 .

[81]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar , 1989 .

[82]  E. Conwell,et al.  Early syntactic productivity: Evidence from dative shift , 2007, Cognition.

[83]  B. D. Schwartz,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL AND SYNTACTIC TRANSFER IN CHILD L2 ACQUISITION OF THE ENGLISH DATIVE ALTERNATION , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[84]  Ainara Imaz Agirre,et al.  The acquisition of dative alternation in English by Spanish learners , 2015 .

[85]  Yuen Ren Chao,et al.  Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology , 1950 .

[86]  Betty Le Compagnon.  Interference and Overgeneralization in Second Language Learning: The Acquisition of English Dative Verbs by Native Speakers of French. , 1984 .

[87]  Paul Seedhouse,et al.  Conversation Analysis and Classroom Interaction , 2019, The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics.

[88]  Sandra Chung,et al.  The Design of Agreement: Evidence from Chamorro , 1998 .

[89]  E. Newport,et al.  Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[90]  Rebecca Woods,et al.  The acquisition of dative alternation by German-English bilingual and English monolingual children , 2015 .

[91]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The acquisition of syntactic knowledge , 1985 .

[92]  P. Niyogi,et al.  Learning from triggers , 1996 .

[93]  Florence Myles,et al.  Interlanguage corpora and second language acquisition research , 2005 .

[94]  Katja Jäschke,et al.  THE DATIVE ALTERNATION IN GERMAN-ENGLISH INTERLANGUAGE , 2015, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[95]  Charles Yang,et al.  Testing the Tolerance Principle: Children form productive rules when it is more computationally efficient to do so , 2016, CogSci.

[96]  John Beavers,et al.  Dative Alternations in Spanish: Syntax or Semantics? , 2009 .

[97]  Yukio Tono.  Multiple comparisons of IL, L1 and TL corpora: The case of L2 acquisition of verb subcategorization patterns by Japanese learners of English , 2004 .