Densification without Growth Management? Evidence from Local Land Development and Housing Trends in Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

In urban America, land development and residential real estate have passed through a number of different phases during the post-WWII era. In contemporary discourse on urban sustainability, attention is often expressed in terms of intensity of land development, lot sizes, and square-footage of housing units. In this paper, we reconstruct the land development trajectory of a rapidly growing southern city in the United States and assess whether this trajectory has experienced any reversal in the face of socio-economic transformations that have occurred over the past decade or so. Starting with current land and real estate property records, we reconstitute the urban map of Charlotte using World War II as a starting point. Results highlight a decline in the average single family lot size over the past decade, while the average home size has consistently grown, suggesting that the city of Charlotte and its county have witnessed a densification trend along a path towards greater land development. This analysis both helps situate Charlotte with respect to other U.S. urban regions, and provides support for potential land-use policies, especially densification, when a balance between urban development, environment preservation, energy savings, and the achievement of quality of life for current and future generations are concerned.

[1]  Oa,et al.  Residential Construction Trends in America's Metropolitan Regions , 2013 .

[2]  Nadine Fogarty,et al.  Rails to Real Estate: Development Patterns along Three New Transit Lines , 2011 .

[3]  Elizabeth C. Delmelle,et al.  Mutual relationships in neighborhood socioeconomic change , 2014 .

[4]  William Graves,et al.  The Corporate (Re) Construction of a New South City: Great Banks Need Great Cities , 2013 .

[5]  Beverly K Wilson,et al.  Comparing apples with apples: how different are recent residential development patterns in Portland and Charlotte? , 2009 .

[6]  D. Miles,et al.  Lot size, zoning, and household preferences , 2012 .

[7]  J. Brueckner Urban Sprawl: Diagnosis and Remedies , 2000 .

[8]  Michael P. Johnson Environmental Impacts of Urban Sprawl: A Survey of the Literature and Proposed Research Agenda , 2001 .

[9]  G. Knaap,et al.  Measuring Urban Form: Is Portland Winning the War on Sprawl? , 2004 .

[10]  G. Galster,et al.  Evolving United States metropolitan land use patterns , 2014 .

[11]  P. Gordon,et al.  Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal , 1997 .

[12]  R. Muth,et al.  Cities and Housing. , 1970 .

[13]  Stephen M. Wheeler,et al.  The Evolution of Built Landscapes in Metropolitan Regions , 2008 .

[14]  L. Frank,et al.  Transportation and land-use preferences and residents’ neighborhood choices: the sufficiency of compact development in the Atlanta region , 2007 .

[15]  Beverly K Wilson,et al.  Do Large Residential Subdivisions Induce Further Development? , 2010 .

[16]  A. Nelson The New Urbanity: The Rise of a New America , 2009 .

[17]  G. Galster,et al.  Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept , 2001 .

[18]  Elizabeth Kopits,et al.  Zoning, TDRs, and the Density of Development , 2006 .

[19]  Russ Lopez,et al.  Sprawl In The 1990s , 2003, Urban affairs review.

[20]  Carol Atkinson-Palombo New housing construction in Phoenix: Evidence of “new suburbanism”? , 2010 .

[21]  Myung-Jin Jun,et al.  The Effects of Portland's Urban Growth Boundary on Urban Development Patterns and Commuting , 2004 .

[22]  John B. Vogler,et al.  FUTURES: Multilevel Simulations of Emerging Urban–Rural Landscape Structure Using a Stochastic Patch-Growing Algorithm , 2013 .