Automated Sizing of Coarse-Grained Sediments: Image-Processing Procedures

This is the first in a pair of papers in which we present image-processing-based procedures for the measurement of fluvial gravels. The spatial and temporal resolution of surface grain-size characterization is constrained by the time-consuming and costly nature of traditional measurement techniques. Several groups have developed image-processing-based procedures, but none have demonstrated the transferability of these techniques between sites with different lithological, clast form and textural characteristics. Here we focus on image-processing procedures for identifying and measuring image objects (i.e. grains); the second paper examines the application of such procedures to the measurement of fluvially deposited gravels. Four image-segmentation procedures are developed, each having several internal parameters, giving a total of 416 permutations. These are executed on 39 images from three field sites at which the clasts have contrasting physical properties. The performance of each procedure is evaluated against a sample of manually digitized grains in the same images, by comparing three derived statistics. The results demonstrate that it is relatively straightforward to develop procedures that satisfactorily identify objects in any single image or a set of images with similar sedimentary characteristics. However, the optimal procedure is that which gives consistently good results across sites with dissimilar sedimentary characteristics. We show that neighborhood-based operations are the most powerful, and a morphological bottom-hat transform with a double threshold is optimal. It is demonstrated that its performance approaches that of the procedures giving the best results for individual sites. Overall, it out-performs previously published, or improvements to previously published, methods.

[1]  John R. Adams,et al.  Gravel Size Analysis from Photographs , 1979 .

[2]  Roman D. Hryciw,et al.  Soil Particle Size Distribution by Mosaic Imaging and Watershed Analysis , 1999 .

[3]  Richard D. Hey,et al.  Sediment transport in gravel-bed rivers , 1987 .

[4]  Horgan.  Mathematical morphology for analysing soil structure from images , 1998 .

[5]  H. Ibbeken,et al.  Photo‐sieving: A method for grain‐size analysis of coarse‐grained, unconsolidated bedding surfaces , 1986 .

[6]  P. Jackway.  Improved morphological top-hat , 2000 .

[7]  John C. Russ,et al.  The Image Processing Handbook , 2016, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[8]  Edward Dougherty,et al.  Morphological Segmentation for Textures and Particles , 2020 .

[9]  J. Wolcott,et al.  Strategies for sampling spatially heterogeneous phenomena; the example of river gravels , 1991 .

[10]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Watersheds in Digital Spaces: An Efficient Algorithm Based on Immersion Simulations , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  M. Wolman.  A method of sampling coarse river‐bed material , 1954 .

[12]  M. Diepenbroek,et al.  How round is round? A new approach to the topic ‘roundness’by Fourier grain shape analysis , 1992 .

[13]  M. Church,et al.  Grain size along two gravel-bed rivers: statistical variation, spatial pattern and sedimentary links , 1998 .

[14]  Michael Diepenbroek,et al.  Quantification of textural particle characteristics by image analysis of sediment surfaces—examples from active and paleo-surfaces in steep, coarse-grained mountain environments , 1993 .

[15]  Robert I. Ferguson,et al.  INFORMATION ON GRAIN SIZES IN GRAVEL-BED RIVERS BY AUTOMATED IMAGE ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[16]  L. Joshua Leon,et al.  Watershed-Based Segmentation and Region Merging , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[17]  C. Glasbey,et al.  Image analysis and three‐dimensional modelling of pores in soil aggregates , 1991 .

[18]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[19]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Automated extraction of grain-size data from gravel surfaces using digital image processing , 2001 .

[20]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Euclidean skeletons and conditional bisectors , 1992, Other Conferences.

[21]  Marie-Noëlle Pons,et al.  Classification of Crystal Shape Using Fourier Descriptors and Mathematical Morphology , 1997 .

[22]  A. R. Allen,et al.  Estimating the size composition of sediment surfaces through image analysis , 2000 .

[23]  John Shaw,et al.  On Grain Size from Thin Sections , 1975, The Journal of Geology.

[24]  Gerald M. Friedman,et al.  Determination of Sieve-Size Distribution from Thin-Section Data for Sedimentary Petrological Studies , 1958, The Journal of Geology.

[25]  Y. Vanderstockt,et al.  Watershed Transfromation: Reducing the Over-Segmentation Problem by Applying a Noice Reducer and a Region Merger , 2002, WSCG.

[26]  Robert Allen,et al.  Handbook of Medical Imaging—Processing and Analysis , 2001 .

[27]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications , 2003 .

[28]  P.K Sahoo,et al.  A survey of thresholding techniques , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[29]  Panayiotis Diplas,et al.  Surface Sampling in Gravel Streams , 1993 .

[30]  Stephen P. Rice,et al.  Sampling surficial fluvial gravels; the precision of size distribution percentile sediments , 1996 .

[31]  Michael Diepenbroek,et al.  Granulometric study of the Hanaupah Fan, Death Valley, California , 1998 .