Identifying Structural Brain Networks from Functional Connectivity: A Network Deconvolution Approach

We address the problem of identifying structural brain networks from signals measured by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). To this end, we model functional brain activity as graph signals generated through a linear diffusion process on the unknown structural network. While this is admittedly an oversimplification of the complex mechanisms at work in the brain, recent studies have shown it is an accurate generative model for the second-order statistics of functional signals. We show the diffusion model implies that the signal covariance matrix (a.k.a. functional connectivity) is an unknown polynomial function of the structural network’s adjacency matrix. Accordingly, we advocate a network deconvolution approach whereby we: (i) use the fMRI signals to estimate the eigenvectors of the structural network from those of the empirical covariance; and (ii) solve a convex, sparsity-regularized inverse problem to recover the eigenvalues that were obscured by diffusion. The inferred structural networks capture some key patterns that match known pathology in attention deficit/hyper activity disorder. We also offer preliminary evidence supporting their role as potential biomarkers for subject diagnosis and classification.

[1]  Vincent Gripon,et al.  Evaluating graph signal processing for neuroimaging through classification and dimensionality reduction , 2017, 2017 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP).

[2]  Santiago Segarra,et al.  Stationary Graph Processes and Spectral Estimation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  Muriel Médard,et al.  Network deconvolution as a general method to distinguish direct dependencies in networks , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Can structure predict function in the human brain? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[6]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Measuring brain connectivity: Diffusion tensor imaging validates resting state temporal correlations , 2008, NeuroImage.

[7]  Xiaobo Li,et al.  A review of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder from the perspective of brain networks , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  M. Bellgrove,et al.  Altered structural connectivity in ADHD: a network based analysis , 2016, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[9]  R. F. Galán,et al.  On How Network Architecture Determines the Dominant Patterns of Spontaneous Neural Activity , 2008, PLoS ONE.

[10]  Alejandro Ribeiro,et al.  Graph Frequency Analysis of Brain Signals , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[11]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Discrete Signal Processing on Graphs , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  H. Voss,et al.  Network diffusion accurately models the relationship between structural and functional brain connectivity networks , 2014, NeuroImage.

[13]  Chien-Chang Ho,et al.  ADHD classification by a texture analysis of anatomical brain MRI data , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[14]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[15]  Santiago Segarra,et al.  Optimal Graph-Filter Design and Applications to Distributed Linear Network Operators , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Anita E. Bandrowski,et al.  The UCLA multimodal connectivity database: a web-based platform for brain connectivity matrix sharing and analysis , 2012, Front. Neuroinform..

[17]  Santiago Segarra,et al.  Network Topology Inference from Spectral Templates , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks.

[18]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  The Neuro Bureau ADHD-200 Preprocessed repository , 2016, NeuroImage.

[19]  Huiguang He,et al.  Classification of ADHD children through multimodal magnetic resonance imaging , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[20]  M. Weiner,et al.  A Network Diffusion Model of Disease Progression in Dementia , 2012, Neuron.

[21]  M. Greicius,et al.  Greater than the sum of its parts: a review of studies combining structural connectivity and resting-state functional connectivity , 2009, Brain Structure and Function.

[22]  Tongsheng Zhang,et al.  Extreme Learning Machine-Based Classification of ADHD Using Brain Structural MRI Data , 2013, PloS one.

[23]  C. J. Honeya,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009 .

[24]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Localizing Sources of Brain Disease Progression with Network Diffusion Model , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[25]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[26]  Pierre Vandergheynst,et al.  Graph Signal Processing: Overview, Challenges, and Applications , 2017, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[27]  Alejandro Ribeiro,et al.  A Graph Signal Processing Perspective on Functional Brain Imaging , 2018, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[28]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Application of Graph Theory to Assess Static and Dynamic Brain Connectivity: Approaches for Building Brain Graphs , 2018, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[29]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Machine Learning with Brain Graphs: Predictive Modeling Approaches for Functional Imaging in Systems Neuroscience , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[30]  O. Sporns Networks of the Brain , 2010 .

[31]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.