Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression

This manuscript aims to assess the potential of social media as a channel to foster democratic deliberation. It does this by examining whether the types of discussions that citizens maintain in two of the most used social media channels managed by the White House - Facebook and YouTube - meet the necessary conditions for deliberative democracy. For this purpose 7230 messages were analyzed and assessed in terms of indicators developed to evaluate online discourse derived from the work of Habermas. By contrasting social media channels that differ in the affordances of identifiability and networked information access (two traditional predictors of online deliberation), we seek to contribute a deeper understanding of social media and its impact on deliberation. Drawing on the social identification/deindividuation (SIDE) model of computer mediated communication and network theories, we predict that political discussions in Facebook will present a more egalitarian distribution of comments between discussants and higher level of politeness in their messages. Consistent with our theoretical framework, results confirm that Facebook expands the flow of information to other networks and enables more symmetrical conversations among users, whereas politeness is lower in the more anonymous and deindividuated YouTube.

[1]  T. Postmes,et al.  Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[2]  Eric S. Fredin.  The Web of Politics: The Internet's Impact on the American Political System , 1999 .

[3]  Mark E. Warren,et al.  What Should and Should Not Be Said: Deliberating Sensitive Issues , 2006 .

[4]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[5]  Tom Postmes,et al.  When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and the influence of power in computer-mediated communication. , 2002 .

[6]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Social Structure and Citizenship: Examining the Impacts of Social Setting, Network Heterogeneity, and Informational Variables on Political Participation , 2004 .

[7]  B. Noveck.  Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful , 2009 .

[8]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Legitimacy, Authority, and Community in Electronic Support Groups , 1998 .

[9]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[10]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups , 2004, New Media Soc..

[11]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley.  Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme , 2007, Regular Issue.

[12]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[13]  T. Postmes,et al.  Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization , 2002 .

[14]  Lincoln Dahlberg,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and The Public Sphere: A Critical Analysis , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  Tarik Sabry.  A New American Democracy , 2007 .

[16]  R. Kies,et al.  Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy , 2005 .

[17]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature , 2004 .

[18]  T. Postmes,et al.  A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .

[19]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[20]  John M. Levine,et al.  Impact of Anticipated Interaction on Information Acquisition , 1995 .

[21]  James Schmidt,et al.  Civility, Enlightenment, and Society: Conceptual Confusions and Kantian Remedies , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[22]  David C. DeAndrea,et al.  The Influence of Online Comments on Perceptions of Antimarijuana Public Service Announcements on YouTube , 2010 .

[23]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[24]  Kristina Lerman.  User Participation in Social Media: Digg Study , 2007, 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Workshops.

[25]  Katherine Cramer Walsh,et al.  Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life , 2003 .

[26]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[27]  Stephen L. Carter,et al.  Civility: Manners, Morals, And The Etiquette Of Democracy , 1998 .

[28]  W. Dutton.  Information and Communication Technologies: Visions and Realities , 1996 .

[29]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? Side-Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication. , 2002 .

[30]  John Gastil,et al.  A Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face—to—Face Groups , 2002 .

[31]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[32]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks , 2004 .

[33]  Kevin Wise,et al.  Moderation, Response Rate, and Message Interactivity: Features of Online Communities and Their Effects on Intent to Participate , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings , 2011, New Media Soc..

[35]  Patricia Moy,et al.  Predicting Deliberative Conversation: The Impact of Discussion Networks, Media Use, and Political Cognitions , 2006 .

[36]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Political Discussion Online , 2011 .

[37]  Patricia G. Lange.  Publicly Private and Privately Public: Social Networking on YouTube , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[38]  Anthony G. Wilhelm.  Virtual sounding boards: How deliberative is on‐line political discussion? , 1998 .

[39]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[40]  Fay Sudweeks,et al.  Networked Interactivity , 1997, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[41]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  The ecological approach to perception , 2002 .

[42]  Dennis Davis,et al.  Democracy and deliberation , 1999 .

[43]  John Gastil,et al.  Is Face-to-Face Citizen Deliberation a Luxury or a Necessity? , 2000 .

[44]  Ray Kirshak.  Book Review: Civility: Manners, Morals, and the Etiquette of Democracy. By Stephen L. Carter. Harper Perennial, New York, 1998 , 2001 .

[45]  Helen L. Norton,et al.  Government Speech 2.0 , 2010 .

[46]  J. Sherblom.  Organization involvement expressed through pronoun use in computer mediated communication , 1990 .

[47]  Sonja Utz,et al.  Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one's profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[48]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[49]  T. Benson.  Rhetoric, civility, and community: Political debate on computer bulletin boards , 1996 .

[50]  M. Schudson,et al.  Why conversation is not the soul of democracy , 1997 .

[51]  Charles Ess,et al.  The handbook of internet studies , 2011 .

[52]  S. Coleman,et al.  Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation , 2001 .

[53]  A. Chadwick.  Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance , 2009 .

[54]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Being a Citizen Online , 2002 .

[55]  Gilad Mishne,et al.  Finding high-quality content in social media , 2008, WSDM '08.

[56]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Political Discussion Frequency, Network Size, and “Heterogeneity” of Discussion as Predictors of Political Knowledge and Participation , 2009 .

[57]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .