Changes in material flows, treatment efficiencies and shifting of environmental loads in the wastewater treatment sector. Part II: Case study of Norway

In Part I, the wastewater treatment sector in the Netherlands was analyzed to determine how the degree of separation of COD (BOD), nitrogen, phosphorus and heavy metals from the wastewater increased over time, and how the proportions of these substances, separated out from the wastewater into the lithosphere and atmosphere, changed over time. This paper applies the same methodology, adopted in the first part, to Norway. Needless to say, the hydrosphere has benefited from a decline in eutrophication and marine/fresh water toxicity, owing to the favourable combination of higher degrees of separation over time and source control, especially in the industrial sector. However, this has been at the expense of damage to the atmosphere (global warming). Technologies have, of course, enabled some mitigation of the problems that have shifted to the atmosphere and lithosphere, though these are beyond the scope of this paper, which assumes a hypothetical worst‐case scenario in this regard. Whereas, in Part I, the time period 1993–2005 was considered, this paper is handicapped by the lack of availability of data and is restricted to a much narrower time period: 2002–2006.

[1]  H. Belevi,et al.  Factors Determining the Element Behavior in Municipal Solid Waste Incinerators. 1. Field Studies , 2000 .

[2]  Ronald L. Droste,et al.  Theory And Practice Of Water And Wastewater Treatment , 1996 .

[3]  P. Boers,et al.  Nutrient emissions from agriculture in the Netherlands, causes and remedies , 1996 .

[4]  F. Cecchi,et al.  Occurrence and fate of heavy metals in large wastewater treatment plants treating municipal and industrial wastewaters. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  W H Rulkens,et al.  Heavy metals extraction from anaerobically digested sludge. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  P. Ockier,et al.  Co-incineration of dried sewage sludge in coal-fired power plants: a case study , 2000 .

[7]  Hansruedi Siegrist,et al.  Reduction of biomass decay rate under anoxic and anaerobic conditions , 1999 .

[8]  Patrick M. Crill,et al.  Methane emissions from municipal wastewater treatment processes , 1993 .

[9]  L. Charerntanyarak Heavy metals removal by chemical coagulation and precipitation , 1999 .

[10]  M Massoud,et al.  Methane emissions from wastewater management. , 2001, Environmental pollution.

[11]  Cristian Picioreanu,et al.  Effect of dynamic process conditions on nitrogen oxides emission from a nitrifying culture. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Keisuke Hanaki,et al.  The generation of CO2 in sewage sludge treatment systems; life cycle assessment , 2000 .

[13]  A. Ito,et al.  Relationship between partition of heavy metals in sewage sludge and elution of heavy metals. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[14]  J.H.J.M. van der Graaf,et al.  Experiments on membrane filtration of effluent at wastewater treatment plants in the netherlands , 1999 .

[15]  T. Onaka Sewage can make Portland cement: a new technology for ultimate reuse of sewage sludge , 2000 .