An ultrasensitive motif for robust closed loop control of biomolecular systems

We describe a molecular reaction network that can be used to achieve robust closed loop control in synthetic biology. The network relies on a motif that exhibits an ultrasensitive input-output mapping, and is therefore termed “Brink Controller”. Ultrasensitivity is achieved by combining molecular titration and an activation/deactivation cycle, and requires the presence of fast titration and switching rates, together with slow degradation rates. We propose to use two Brink Controllers in parallel to overcome a major limitation in traditional molecular feedback controllers: their inability to supply simultaneously positive and negative action on the system to be controlled. The Brink Controller motif can be used to achieve both regulatory functions, by simply swapping the inputs of the motif. We assess the effectiveness of the closed loop architecture with numerical simulations, and we suggest potential experimental realizations of the circuit.

[1]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[2]  Ankit Gupta,et al.  Antithetic Integral Feedback Ensures Robust Perfect Adaptation in Noisy Biomolecular Networks. , 2014, Cell systems.

[3]  Christian Cuba Samaniego,et al.  An ultrasensitive biomolecular network for robust feedback control , 2017 .

[4]  J H Koeslag,et al.  Integral rein control in physiology. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  M. Khammash,et al.  Antithetic Integral Feedback Ensures Robust Perfect Adaptation in Noisy Biomolecular Networks. , 2016, Cell systems.

[6]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Molecular titration and ultrasensitivity in regulatory networks. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Franco Blanchini,et al.  Molecular Titration Promotes Oscillations and Bistability in Minimal Network Models with Monomeric Regulators. , 2016, ACS synthetic biology.

[8]  D. Y. Zhang,et al.  Engineering Entropy-Driven Reactions and Networks Catalyzed by DNA , 2007, Science.

[9]  E. Winfree,et al.  Construction of an in vitro bistable circuit from synthetic transcriptional switches , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[10]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Control theory meets synthetic biology , 2016, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[11]  G. Seelig,et al.  Dynamic DNA nanotechnology using strand-displacement reactions. , 2011, Nature chemistry.

[12]  Jennifer A. Doudna,et al.  DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9 , 2014, Nature.

[13]  J. Ferrell,et al.  Ultrasensitivity part I: Michaelian responses and zero-order ultrasensitivity. , 2014, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[14]  A. Regev,et al.  Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System , 2015, Cell.

[15]  Young Je Lee,et al.  Programmable control of bacterial gene expression with the combined CRISPR and antisense RNA system , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  Huiyi Chen,et al.  Genome-wide study of mRNA degradation and transcript elongation in Escherichia coli , 2015, Molecular systems biology.

[17]  Luke A. Gilbert,et al.  Engineering Complex Synthetic Transcriptional Programs with CRISPR RNA Scaffolds , 2015, Cell.

[18]  Luke A. Gilbert,et al.  Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression , 2013, Cell.

[19]  K. Jensen,et al.  The RNA chain elongation rate in Escherichia coli depends on the growth rate , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Synthetic circuit for exact adaptation and fold-change detection , 2014, Nucleic acids research.