Validity of an Intuitive Personality Scale: Personal Responsibility as a Predictor of Academic Achievement

Fifty undergraduate students (27 female, 23 male) completed measures of verbal intelligence and locus of control, together with the Responsibility scale of the California Psychological Inventory and a student-written scale of Personal Responsibility. On the basis of correlational and multiple-regression analyses, it was found that Intelligence and Personal Responsibility were jointly the most efficient predictors of a subject's mean course grade, and that the latter was the best single predictor. These results add further support to Jackson's (1971) contention that naive item writers can create personality scales of equivalent or greater validity than more formal empirically-derived scales.

[1]  H. Gough,et al.  Predicting Grades in College from the California Psychological Inventory , 1986 .

[2]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Locus of control and academic achievement: A literature review. , 1983 .

[3]  H. Scott,et al.  An evaluation of Graduate Record Examinations as predictors of graduate success in a Canadian context. , 1983 .

[4]  D. Saccuzzo,et al.  Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications, and Issues , 1982 .

[5]  Bernard S. Gorman,et al.  BASIC BACKSTEP: A simple backward-selection multiple-regression program for minicomputers and microcomputers , 1981 .

[6]  L. K. Waters,et al.  Moderating Effect of Achievement Motivation and Locus of Control on the Relationship Between Academic Ability and Academic Performance , 1981 .

[7]  Warner V. Slack,et al.  The Scholastic Aptitude Test: A Critical Appraisal , 1980 .

[8]  Roy D. Goldman,et al.  Why College Grade Point Average is Difficult to Predict. , 1976 .

[9]  D. Jackson.  The Relative Validity of Scales Prepared By Naive Item Writers and Those Based On Empirical Methods of Personality Scale Construction1 , 1975 .

[10]  W. W. Willingham.  Predicting Success in Graduate Education: Improved selection procedures are likely to come from better definitions of "success". , 1974, Science.

[11]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  In response to Jackson's challenge: The comparative validity of personality scales constructed by the external (empirical) strategy and scales developed intuitively by experts, novices, and laymen☆ , 1973 .

[12]  Glen E. Mendels.  The Predictive Validity of the Lorge-Thorndike Intelligence Tests at the Kindergarten Level , 1973 .

[13]  Douglas N. Jackson,et al.  The dynamics of structured personality tests: 1971. , 1971 .

[14]  A. Stroup.  THE PREDICTION OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE FROM PERSONALITY AND APTITUDE VARIABLES , 1970 .

[15]  R. Cattell,et al.  Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16 PF) , 1970 .

[16]  C. Argyris,et al.  Some unintended consequences of rigorous research. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  H. Butcher.  Human intelligence; its nature and assessment , 1968 .

[18]  Raymond B. Cattell,et al.  The prediction of achievement and creativity , 1968 .

[19]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[20]  J. Holland.  The prediction of college grades from the California Psychological Inventory and the Scholastic Aptitude Test. , 1959 .