Normalization references for Europe and North America for application with USEtox™ characterization factors

PurposeIn life cycle impact assessment, normalization can be a very effective tool for the life cycle assessment practitioner to interpret results and put them into perspective. The paper presents normalization references for the recently developed USEtox™ model, which aims at calculating globally applicable characterization factors. Normalization references for Europe and North America are determined, and guidance for expansions to other geographical regions is provided.Materials and methodsThe base years of the European and North American inventories are 2004 and 2002/2008, respectively. Emission data were extracted from two literature sources referring to each of the considered regions. The inventory for North America was adapted to avoid extrapolation of data from other regions and thus bring consistency with the emission inventory for Europe. In spite of different inventory assumptions, a similar coverage of substances was obtained for both regions with relatively high representation of metals and a number of organic compounds, mainly consisting of non-methane volatile organic compounds and pesticides. The two inventory sets were eventually characterized with the characterization factors (CFs) calculated with the version 1.0 of the USEtox™ model and substance database; both interim and recommended CFs were used.Results and discussionNormalization references are provided for Europe and North America for the three USEtox™ toxic impact categories; ratios between the normalization references for the two regions in all cases lie below a factor of 3. Causes for the observed discrepancies are found to be different inventory assumptions as well as variations in the type and intensity of actual emissions between the two regions. Additional causes are inventories that only cover a limited number of substances, and the characterization model, which can only provide interim factors for certain substances like metal compounds. Based on these causes and on a review of recent studies on normalization references, a list of substances to be prioritized when collecting emission data was built, demonstrating the importance of metals.ConclusionsIn the perspective of further refining the presented normalization references and of calculating new references for other regions, guidance is provided including a list of priority substances that should be considered when building emission inventories for normalization references.

[1]  T. Grube,et al.  World Water Resources at the Beginning of the 21st Century , 2003 .

[2]  B. Stewart,et al.  World Cancer Report , 2003 .

[3]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[4]  Stig Irving Olsen,et al.  Normalization in EDIP97 and EDIP2003: updated European inventory for 2004 and guidance towards a consistent use in practice , 2011 .

[5]  Thomas Gloria,et al.  Development of the method and U.S. normalization database for Life Cycle Impact Assessment and sustainability metrics. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  P. Boyle,et al.  World Cancer Report 2008 , 2009 .

[7]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[8]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Environmental assessment of products , 1997 .

[9]  J. Bare,et al.  Development of normalization factors for Canada and the United States and comparison with European factors. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: an LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2002 .

[12]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Environmental assessment of products volume 1: Methodology, tools, and case studies in product , 1997 .

[13]  C. Mathers,et al.  Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008 , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[14]  M. Hauschild,et al.  PestLCI—A model for estimating field emissions of pesticides in agricultural LCA , 2006 .

[15]  Sven Lundie,et al.  Australian characterisation factors and normalisation figures for human toxicity and ecotoxicity , 2007 .

[16]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Integrating Human Indoor Air Pollutant Exposure within Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2009, Environmental science & technology.