Interpreting the meaningfulness of changes in health‐related quality of life scores: Lessons from studies in adults

The measurement of health‐related quality of life (HRQL) in adults with cancer has proceeded more quickly than has similar measurement in children, so there may be value in applying some methods used in adults to studies in children. An example is a health‐transition state instrument called the Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ). The SSQ asks patients to give their own estimates of the degree to which their HRQL has changed with time and, thus, provides a method for interpreting the meaningfulness of changes in scores as derived from a general questionnaire, the EORTC QLQ‐C30. The development of similar health‐transition instruments for children poses special challenges and requires the development of appropriate methodology. It is suggested that, with the use of cartoons and the answers of proxies, it should be feasible to assess the meaningfulness of changes in HRQL over time in young children as well as in adolescents. Int. J. Cancer Suppl. 12:132–137, 1999. ©1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  D. Osoba,et al.  Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Minimum skills required by children to complete health-related quality of life instruments for asthma: comparison of measurement properties. , 1997, The European respiratory journal.

[3]  D. Osoba,et al.  The use of significant others as proxy raters of the quality of life of patients with brain cancer. , 1997, Medical care.

[4]  N. Aaronson,et al.  Value of caregiver ratings in evaluating the quality of life of patients with cancer. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  D. Tulsky,et al.  Quality of life in cancer: definition, purpose, and method of measurement. , 1993, Cancer investigation.

[7]  R. Hays,et al.  Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings. The clinician's point of view. The Dartmouth Primary Care COOP Project. , 1992, Medical care.

[8]  Anastasia E. Raczek,et al.  The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. , 1992, Medical care.

[9]  R. Hays,et al.  Improving task comprehension in the measurement of health state preferences. A trial of informational cartoon figures and a paired-comparison task. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  N. Aaronson,et al.  The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: a review. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  D. Osoba Effect of Cancer On Quality of Life , 1991 .

[12]  N. Aaronson Methodologic issues in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients , 1991, Cancer.

[13]  E. Nelson,et al.  The Functional Status of Patients: How Can It Be Measured in Physicians' Offices? , 1990, Medical care.

[14]  R. Hays,et al.  The COOP Function Charts: A System to Measure Patient Function in Physicians’ Offices , 1990 .

[15]  Ron D. Hays,et al.  Assessing Function: Does It Really Make a Difference? A Preliminary Evaluation of the Acceptability and Utility of the COOP Function Charts , 1990 .

[16]  R. Hays,et al.  The Functional Status of Patients , 1990 .

[17]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[18]  R. Sanson-Fisher,et al.  Measuring quality of life in cancer patients. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Lewis E. Kazis,et al.  Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status , 1989, Medical care.

[20]  W. Gregory,et al.  Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient? , 1988, British Journal of Cancer.

[21]  T. M. Kashner,et al.  Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health and functional status. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  R. Battista Discussion: Morris and Sherwood's “quality of life of cancer patients at different stages in the disease trajectory” , 1987 .

[23]  A. Stewart,et al.  Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[24]  Paul L. Harris,et al.  Insight into the Time Course of Emotion among Western and Chinese Children. , 1985 .