Sex, Mate Selection, and Evolution

Simulations of the evolution of populations of diploid organisms showed that mate selection strategies which selected for “good genes” and strategies based on assortative mating, confer a much higher average fitness and higher evolutionary stability to populations than random mating. This advantage was more conspicuous the more genes per organism were simulated and the more genes were involved in the phenotype screened for mate selection. The results suggest that the evolutionary advantage of mate selection becomes evident only when the simultaneous adaptation of several genes are simulated. A cautionary lesson from the model is that mating is not likely to be random in nature and that mate selection may direct evolution by accelerating the exposure to natural selection of relevant traits. That is, models assuming random mating may not reflect what is happening in nature as sexual reproduction is probably associated with mate or gamete selection in most living organisms.

[1]  D. Ruelle Chance and Chaos , 2020 .

[2]  L. Jacobs,et al.  Sexual selection and the brain. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  H J Bremermann,et al.  Sex and polymorphism as strategies in host-pathogen interactions. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  David Granot,et al.  Mate selection in yeast: A reconsideration of the signals and the message encoded by them , 1995 .

[5]  C. Wedekind,et al.  MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Sex against virulence: the coevolution of parasitic diseases. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  Barbara Gregg,et al.  Human Assortative Mating and Genetic Equilibrium: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1980 .

[8]  Eckart Voland,et al.  The Sociobiology of sexual and reproductive strategies , 1989 .

[9]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  W. Hamilton Sex versus non-sex versus parasite , 1980 .

[11]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  L. Hurst,et al.  Recent advances in understanding of the evolution and maintenance of sex. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Sexual selection. , 2019, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  H. Muller Some Genetic Aspects of Sex , 1932, The American Naturalist.

[15]  P. Feldman Evolution of sex , 1975, Nature.

[16]  W. L. Payne,et al.  High Mutation Frequencies Among Escherichia coli and Salmonella Pathogens , 1996, Science.

[17]  Karl Grammer,et al.  Human courtship behaviour: biological basis and cognitive processing , 1998 .

[18]  K. Jaffe,et al.  Dynamics of the emergence of genetic resistance to biocides among asexual and sexual organisms. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  K. Jaffe,et al.  Assortative mating: sex differences in mate selection for married and unmarried couples. , 1995, Human biology.

[20]  W. Eberhard Female control : sexual selection by cryptic female choice , 1996 .

[21]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Genetic similarity, human altruism, and group selection , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  Alexey S. Kondrashov,et al.  The asexual ploidy cycle and the origin of sex , 1994, Nature.

[23]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Evolutionary wanderlust: sexual selection with directional mate preferences , 1993 .

[24]  W. Atmar On the role of males , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[26]  C. Lively,et al.  Parasitism, mutation accumulation and the maintenance of sex , 1994, Nature.

[27]  H. Muller THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE. , 1964, Mutation research.

[28]  O P Judson,et al.  Ancient asexual scandals. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  S. Levin,et al.  Mathematical and Computational Challenges in Population Biology and Ecosystems Science , 1997, Science.

[30]  J. Maynard Smith,et al.  Short-term selection for recombination among mutually antagonistic species , 1987, Nature.